Debunker says what?

[triforcharity]

HI,

Listen thickskull, I was there, Saw both WTC 1 and 2 fall. I never heard a bomb or anything that resembled a bomb. Neither did the 10,000 other people who watched them fall. 50 might have heard an EXPLOSION, but not one bomb!!

Now, go back to your crayons.

Politeness Man says "name calling and other personal insults are never polite."

In other words...attack the argument and not the arguer (Rule 12 of your membership agreement).

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar

 

[Baylor]

Got that too huh? You're on a roll. Good for you.

Now this thread is down to silly semantics. Neither of the following statements make sense, but which is less incoherent?

I bet they could have put more then [sic] 10 (bombs) in just one building in a years time.

I bet they could have put more then [sic] 10 (buildings) in just one building in a years time.

 

[1337m4n]

I don't understand what HI is trying to argue. Is he saying that the buildings are still standing?

To this day, even

 

[Shalamar]

How does that fairytale go again? You know, the one about how explosives could never have gotten close to the WTC because of all the security and people who would have witnessed it?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/08/national/main5143545.shtml?tag=stack

Bomb Materials Smuggled into Fed Buildings

Whaaa...?

How did that happen?

Did they also assemble the explosives and install them in full view of workers and then set them off with new visible or auditory evidence?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

So now you're saying the buildings didn't fall?

Whoops. You missed that one. Maybe you should quit while you're are ahead.

Or maybe you can answer.

Could it have been possible to get explosive devices inside the WTC buildings without anyone noticing?

Yes or no?

 

[Justin39640]

You're new here aren't you?

im just an optimist lol

 

[Justin39640]

Whoops. You missed that one. Maybe you should quit while you're are ahead.

Or maybe you can answer.

Could it have been possible to get explosive devices inside the WTC buildings without anyone noticing?

Yes or no?

no

 

[triforcharity]

There would have had to be thousands upon thousands of explosives PER TOWER to bring down the TT. This didn't happen.

Do you understand the words "degrade" or "unreliable" or "unpredictible"???

Means, the charges might have gone off randomly, and without any rhyme or reason.
Not gone off at all.
Gone off with the same power as a sparkler.

Which means.............(Wait for it..........Wait for it)........... FAIL!!!!!!

 

[Shalamar]

Whoops. You missed that one. Maybe you should quit while you're are ahead.

Or maybe you can answer.

Could it have been possible to get explosive devices inside the WTC buildings without anyone noticing?

Yes or no?

Sure it is.

How many silent explosives would be needed to bring down the towers? Would it be possible for the smugglers to cut holes into the walls to place the carefully wired explosives against the beams?

You of course have evidence that this all happened?

 

[dtugg]

Hey genius, here is a question that you will no doubt ignore (again):

Did the WTC have bomb sniffing dogs? Did any of these federal buildings? Quick, twoofer, pwn me!

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Did they also assemble the explosives and install them in full view of workers and then set them off with new visible or auditory evidence?

Why would they need to in full view of anyone? They said they constructed the bombs and walked away undetected.

new or no?

Because there was no evidence left of a lot of things after the WTC attacks. The black boxes were never found and more then 1,000 victims were never found. And who investigated for explosives evidence and how?

 

[dtugg]

Looks at this picture of a kitten in a pop tart box:

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Hey genius, here is a question that you will no doubt ignore (again):

Did the WTC have bomb sniffing dogs? Did any of these federal buildings? Quick, twoofer, pwn me!

When?

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-nyaler122362178sep12,0,1255660.story

Heightened Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted

By Curtis L. Taylor and Sean Gardiner | STAFF WRITERS
September 12, 2001

Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.

I don't see what it maters either way. Especially in a case where guards even at federal buildings post 9/11 are found sleeping and people who just smuggled inside and constructed a bomb are walking around undetected.

Do the dogs work independently?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Sure it is.

How many silent explosives would be needed to bring down the towers? Would it be possible for the smugglers to cut holes into the walls to place the carefully wired explosives against the beams?

You of course have evidence that this all happened?

How many explosive were against the beams in your story?

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

There would have had to be thousands upon thousands of explosives PER TOWER to bring down the TT. This didn't happen.

Should I stundie this?

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Holy Jesus, HI said what?? No, of course none of the NIST, FEMA, or other investigations didn't involve accessing elevator shafts and out-of-the-way spaces in the buildings. That's because they don't make the insane explanation that explosives were placed against structural elements!

Duh!

Something about acres-wide and multistory fires exacerbating damage from airliners travelling at over 400 MPH seems to escape this idiot. It takes a real delusional person to equivocate the placing of briefcases in bathrooms to the impacts of Boeing jets and large resultant fires. I really recommend that everyone put him on ignore. He's got nothing serious to contribute to any discussion about 9/11. This thread is testimony to that.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

no

Why not?

 

[Baylor]

There would have had to be thousands upon thousands of explosives PER TOWER to bring down the TT. This didn't happen.

Should I stundie this?

No.

CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.

 

[Homeland Insurgency]

Holy Jesus, HI said what?? No, of course none of the NIST, FEMA, or other investigations didn't involve accessing elevator shafts and out-of-the-way spaces in the buildings. That's because they don't make the insane explanation that explosives were placed against structural elements!

Why would they need to be placed against structural elements? What was carefully placed against structural elements in your story?

Something about acres-wide and multistory fires exacerbating damage from airliners travelling at over 400 MPH seems to escape this idiot. It takes a real delusional person to equivocate the placing of briefcases in bathrooms to the impacts of Boeing jets and large resultant fires. I really recommend that everyone put him on ignore. He's got nothing serious to contribute to any discussion about 9/11. This thread is testimony to that.

Were the elevators not in the core? If people can walk around and construct bombs undetected why couldn't they do it on an elevator? Or several?

 

[stateofgrace]

Holy Jesus, HI said what?? No, of course none of the NIST, FEMA, or other investigations didn't involve accessing elevator shafts and out-of-the-way spaces in the buildings. That's because they don't make the insane explanation that explosives were placed against structural elements!

Duh!

Something about acres-wide and multistory fires exacerbating damage from airliners travelling at over 400 MPH seems to escape this idiot. It takes a real delusional person to equivocate the placing of briefcases in bathrooms to the impacts of Boeing jets and large resultant fires. I really recommend that everyone put him on ignore. He's got nothing serious to contribute to any discussion about 9/11. This thread is testimony to that.

QFE, ignore is your friend.