• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Debunker says what?

dtugg said:
Do you purposely construct your posts to be as incoherent as possible?
Click to expand...

Why?

You don't like the double spacing?

And the incoherent questions?

Never before in history has a troll double spaced so many posts with incoherent questions.

Do you find it bizarre a grown man gets a kick out of these deranged posts on an internet forum?

Why is that debunker?

Can you answer it?
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Good. Glad you got that about your so-called debunking of explosives.

Now. Why couldn't enough explosives have been put in the WTC buildings before 9/11?
Click to expand...

Nobody heard or saw anything consistent with man-made explosive demolition at WTC on 9/11.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
TONS or none?

Which is it?
Click to expand...

As mentioned: False Dilemma

None if you also smuggle in, at 500 MPH (that's some smuggling) two fully fueled passenger jets.

No one ever said it took just an hour for two skyscrapers to fall, unaided. You just don't think a plane hit either tower, so have a problem recognizing them and the ensuing damage from the crash and from the fires as a cause.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fe..._finds_major_security_flaws.html?hpid=topnews

“In the past year, investigators successfully smuggled bomb-making materials into ten high-security federal buildings, constructed bombs and walked around the buildings undetected”

Wow.

I bet they could have put more then [sic] 10 in just one building in a years time.
Click to expand...

They meant buildings not bombs genius. You'd need a little more thAn ten.

CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
Click to expand...

http://www.controlled-demolition.com/default.asp?reqLocId=7&reqItemId=20030225133807
 
Funny that. The penetration of building security in the recent investigation did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.

On top of that, nothing about this investigation by the GAO shows how they got the explosives to work in a way that didn't leave characteristics of their use, such as explosively formed steel fragments and explosively severed steel columns.

Funny that. An apple is not like an orange. Who knew? :rolleyes:
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Funny that. The penetration of building security in the recent investigation did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.

On top of that, nothing about this investigation by the GAO shows how they got the explosives to work in a way that didn't leave characteristics of their use, such as explosively formed steel fragments and explosively severed steel columns.

Funny that. An apple is not like an orange. Who knew? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Funny that. The penetration of building security in the official version did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.

But the buildings still fell.

Right? :rolleyes:
 
I hereby deem this thread, and HI in general to be an

epic-failure.jpg
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Funny that. The penetration of building security in the official version did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.

But the buildings still fell.

Right? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You're making even less sense. If that is even possible.
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Funny that. The penetration of building security in the official version did not involve accessing elevator shafts and attaching explosives to load bearing structures behind walls and out of the publicly available areas.

But the buildings still fell.

Right? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
So now you're saying the buildings didn't fall? :wackygoofy:
 
Homeland Insurgency said:
Good. Glad you got that about your so-called debunking of explosives.

Now. Why couldn't enough explosives have been put in the WTC buildings before 9/11?
Click to expand...


As I said before. Please refer up to the post I have. Here is the quote

triforcharity said:
First off, here is the first sentence.

Federal investigators had no trouble smuggling bomb-making materials past ill-trained and poorly supervised guards. NOT BOMBS!!! JUST THE MATERIAL TO MAKE THEM!!

Secondly, "The committee, chaired by Lieberman, heard how Government Accountability Office investigators on 10 occasions carried the components for an improvised explosive device through checkpoints monitored by FPS guards. In all 10 cases the bomb-making materials went undetected. "

IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE, NOT C-4, not something else HE, but somthing that could make a bomb. Ie: A soda bottle, hydrochloric acid, and aluminum foil=an IED!!!

Third, ILL TRAINED, or not qualified.

"While the FPS requires that all prospective guards complete 128 hours of training, including eight hours of x-ray and magnetometer training, in one region the service had not provided the x-ray or metal detector training to its 1,500 guards since 2004. "


Now, does that make it any more acceptable, **** NO!!! Does it mean that someone COULD have smuggled large amounts of C-4 or some other high explosive into WTC?? Nope. Now, also, take into consideration that this "bomb" that they made could fit into a BRIEFCASE!! Also, take into consideration that none of the building have a bomb sniffing dog walking the premesis. If they had, most likely the dog would have smelled something fishey. A dog's sense of smell is Up to 10,000 times more sensititive than our noses, and have 200,000,000 scent receptors.

I know, lots of people bring suitcases into WTC. but, everyone goes through a metal detector, and their bag is x-rayed. Not to mention, how long would this have taken to accomplish?? Aa few months?? HE becomes unstable and unreliable in just a few hours of exposure to open air, shock, etc. etc. etc.

So, what's your point??
Click to expand...



First off, this was an IED. Google IED, or read my quote.
Second-HE degrade over just hours exposed to the open air, movement, dust, etc.etc.etc. They are not predictible or reliable after even 12 hours.

Your theory is an idiotic one at best.
 
triforcharity said:
As I said before. Please refer up to the post I have. Here is the quote

First off, this was an IED. Google IED, or read my quote.
Second-HE degrade over just hours exposed to the open air, movement, dust, etc.etc.etc. They are not predictible or reliable after even 12 hours.

Your theory is an idiotic one at best.
Click to expand...

tsk tsk

How many explosives were needed in your story? Reliable or not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom