The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

[Astrophotographer]

Can you possibly provide some specific post numbers, Astro?

I'd like to look over your counter-analysis......so I can do some counter-counter analysis.

Give me a break sweaty. Remember, you were the one who stated "I don't do numbers" or words to that effect. Anything you have posted has been refuted long ago. Go back to your pointy head argument and see where I demonstrated the lines were incorrectly drawn and when correctly drawn, they are about the right shape(post 1275). You can't provide a "counter-counter analysis" because you don't do measurements. In fact, when I posted that argument you ignored it and started off on something else.

When your values were shown to be wrong, you changed the subject or left for a few weeks (claiming you were still moving). Now you are back with a new analysis, which isn't anything of the sort because it has no values to work with and only your subjective lines drawn on a cherry picked image from the PGF. So what is it this time? Is Bob's head:

1) Too big?

2) Not pointy enough?

3) Not flat enough?

4) Too square?

5) Too round?

You continuously refute your own argument by changing the argument.

 

[RayG]

Here ya go Sweatcheeks...

Posts 1129, 1175, 1275, 1360, 1425, and 1428 of this PG Film - Bob H. & Patty thread

Post 14773 (page 370) of the Bigfoot - The Patterson Gimlin Film thread.

RayG

 

[SweatyYeti]

Here ya go Sweatcheeks...

Posts 1129, 1175, 1275, 1360, 1425, and 1428 of this PG Film - Bob H. & Patty thread

Post 14773 (page 370) of the Bigfoot - The Patterson Gimlin Film thread.

RayG

Thanks, Ray........I'll check them out.

 

[tsig]

Thanks, Ray........I'll check them out.

Why didn't you do that the first time?

 

[SweatyYeti]

Why didn't you do that the first time?

I did. But I don't have a great memory....so I'll have to look those posts over again.

 

[SweatyYeti]

Focusing on differences in the size of the head.......here is another comparison of 'Bob-in-a-suit' with Patty...(allegedly 'Bob-in-a-suit').


I chose a point on Patty's head, just above the ear....to show how different the size...(and shape)...of her head is than 'Bob-in-a-suit's' head...

A look at the highlighted images, much smaller...

 

[kitakaze]

Shake it, Sweaty. Shake it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFqkTFYykzU

 

[kitakaze]

it's...

2 very similar, and unambiguous suit-heads....and...
1 very different, and ambiguous "suit-head".

You're calling that unambiguous? Wow. La la la la Land.

If I had never seen that thing 42 times in 15 different commercials and it jumped out the bush at me in the woods on a sunny afternoon, I think I'd practice my tae kwon run-away.

 

[makaya325]

You're calling that unambiguous? Wow. La la la la Land.

If I had never seen that thing 42 times in 15 different commercials and it jumped out the bush at me in the woods on a sunny afternoon, I think I'd practice my tae kwon run-away.

If it was charging at you, you would see differences for it being a fake rather than real. Always stand your ground to see if its a fake, or the real deal. Please, Kitz, dont waste your martial arts on a myth!

 

[Astrophotographer]

Sweaty drew his lines inaccurately. "Bunny's" line to above where Sweaty figures the ear is located and to the hip is not drawn the same way "Bob's" line (which is drawn to the side/back of the head and to the butt). Bunny's head and Bob's head are not in the same position to make a correct comparison and the legs are not in the same position either. I think this drawing shows a more accurate line for Bob comparing to "Bunny"'s line:



It is possible that I may not understand what Sweaty is trying to demonstrate here but it is clear that his reference points are highly subjective in order to "paint" a certain point of view. I am not sure how this demonstrates that Bob can't fit into "Bunny's" head. Keep trying sweaty but this appears to be a non-starter to begin with.

 

[snoop_doxie]

Sweaty, crayons lines = epic fail.

The last time this was tried was around post 1235-1275. In that series, Sweaty contended Bob's head was not pointy enough or not cone-shaped enough. His little crayon drawings were demonstrated to be poorly scaled (and grossly out of scale in one selection) and the lines incorrectly drawn. This is another attempt by sweaty to "put more lipstick on the pig". He shifted his claim now to Bob's head is not flat enough or something like that. We can dance around this for days but it is the same old problem with Sweaty, he cherry picks something, everyone demonstrates his selection is poor and the other stills don't show this/his scaling is off/his lines or incorrectly drawn (he chopped off the top of "bunny's" head in his line above)/etc. Sweaty then disappears for a few months and then comes back with the same (or very similar) argument as if it is fresh/new ideas. Blah.....Blah.....zzzzzzzzzz

thank you astrophotographer.
i have read hundreds (maybe thousands) of Bigfoot posts.
I certainly see Sweaty's pattern now.
When he adds oversized text and childish retorts to well-thought out posts, his personality really shines.

 

[SweatyYeti]

It is possible that I may not understand what Sweaty is trying to demonstrate here but it is clear that his reference points are highly subjective in order to "paint" a certain point of view. I am not sure how this demonstrates that Bob can't fit into "Bunny's" head. Keep trying sweaty but this appears to be a non-starter to begin with.

Yes, Astro....there is a very good chance that you did not understand what my post demonstrates.

.....it is clear that his reference points are highly subjective in order to "paint" a certain point of view.

Wrong.

I chose a clearly-defined, and specifically-placed point....on both subjects...(which are both, allegedly, a "Bob-In-The-Suit")......the back edge of the visible head, approx. half-way up the head...

There is nothing 'subjective' as to where that edge is, on either subject.

It's clearly distinguishable from the backgrounds.


If you think that it is subjective, Astro....then kindly demonstrate where you see the back edge.

 

[Astrophotographer]

I chose a clearly-defined, and specifically-placed point....on both subjects...(which are both, allegedly, a "Bob-In-The-Suit")......the back edge of the visible head, approx. half-way up the head...

Originally, you stated you picked a point on the head just above the ear and now it is at the back edge of the visible head. Make up your mind.

If this is your criteria, then "Bunny's" line is incorrect. It is not drawn at the "back edge of the visible head". Additionally, your endpoint on the other end is completely different. Bunny's goes to the mid-thigh and Bob's goes to the back of the Butt. Let's retry your lines drawn on "bunny" to match where you drew them on Bob.



Feel free to explain what you are trying to prove because the way you draw your lines it looks like you are just way off the mark.

BTW, since we are not involved in any precise measurements and where you think the lines should be drawn on very low resolution images, this is by definition, "subjective" (i.e. based on your personal opinion) in nature and not "objective" (uninfluenced by your personal preferences).

 

[SweatyYeti]

Astro wrote:

Originally, you stated you picked...

a point on the head just above the ear


and now it is at..


the back edge of the visible head.



Make up your mind.

Astro...

WAKE UP.


Here is what I said in my original post...


"BACK OF HEAD...JUST ABOVE THE EAR"

GO BACK AND SEE IF YOU CAN FIND THOSE WORDS IN MY ORIGINAL POST.

IF YOU CAN....THEN LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND SAY TO YOURSELF...

"DUH!"

Astro also wrote:

Make up your mind

Astro.....you didn't show that where the back edge of Patty's head is, is a "subjective" determination, did you???


You didn't...................because it's not.



I just made-up my mind, Astro.....that I'm not going to continue responding to all of your worthless, senseless, screwed-up, meaningless, garbage "analysis".

 

[Blackdog]

Yep just like the Memorial Day footage thread, when you get your butt kicked you quit.

 

[Astrophotographer]

I just made-up my mind, Astro.....that I'm not going to continue responding to all of your worthless, senseless, screwed-up, meaningless, garbage "analysis".[/SIZE]

Why do you feel a need to yell sweaty? Anyway, let's look at your exact statements in post 1666 and post


post 1666 - I chose a point on Patty's head, just above the ear....


post 1674 - I chose a clearly-defined, and specifically-placed point....on both subjects...(which are both, allegedly, a "Bob-In-The-Suit")......the back edge of the visible head, approx. half-way up the head...

In post 1666, you did not state - "BACK OF HEAD...JUST ABOVE THE EAR". However, I see that your image does state this "now". I still don't understand what you are trying to demonstrate here. It is about as clear as mud. However, your lines do not agree with what you state you are trying to do.

BTW, your positioning of the line IS subjective because the "back of the head" is different for "Bunny" as I demonstrated in my previous post. This image may help you as the blue circle shows where the "back" of "Bunny's" head really is located.

Additionally, you other endpoint made no sense as it was way off compared to Bob. That is pretty subjective IMO. Why do you have the bottom of your line going to different points on the two figures (Bob's butt and "bunny's" mid thigh? Could you answer that simple question?

 

[kitakaze]

(irritating massive text snipped)

I just made-up my mind, Astro.....that I'm not going to continue responding to all of your worthless, senseless, screwed-up, meaningless, garbage "analysis".

Nice spaz. You know, on top of being an ineffectual debater, you're just a plane nuisance when you have one of your little Sweaty's amazing technicolor dreampost massive text flip-outs. Here is a major understatment...

For the record....I'm not against the use of large lettering.....an occasional word spoken loudly.

Yeah, no kidding.

I can only think that a person who thinks doing that is useful or effective is at least a little out of their heads. All you end up doing is looking like this.

 

[makaya325]

Ouch

 

[SweatyYeti]

Astro wrote:

BTW, your positioning of the line IS subjective because the "back of the head" is different for "Bunny" as I demonstrated in my previous post.

This image may help you as the blue circle shows where the "back" of "Bunny's" head really is located...

Really???


Patty's ear is the 'back of her head'???



Then what would you call this 'edge' I highlighted in red, Astro.....Patty's elbow??...

Can you describe what you think that edge is?



Sorry, kitty......but Astro needs the large lettering ....it helps him to "understand".



Edited to add:

After I get finished playing Astro's "Dum Dum" game....I'm going to re-post the comparison, and start over again with it.

 

[makaya325]

Astro wrote:




Really???


Patty's ear is the 'back of her head'???



Then what would you call this 'edge' I highlighted in red, Astro.....Patty's elbow??...


[qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Patty/AstroGOOGOOGAAGAA1.gif[/qimg]




Can you describe what you think that edge is?



Sorry, kitty......but Astro needs the large lettering ....it helps him to "understand".

If that was a real ear, it would be a couple of inches lower on the head, just below its temple, not high up on it head.