. All right, since youve labeled the news "propaganda," do you have any actual evidence to offer to support this racsh of specific accusations? If so, what is it?
Here is part of a story current on Google news:
Obama is set to arrive in Moscow on Monday with his wife Michelle, for a visit which includes talks with Medvedev and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, and an onward trip to the Group of Eight summit in Italy and Ghana.
The US president announced on the eve of the G20 summit in London on April 1 that he would visit Russia in July, in line with his administration's bid to "reset" US ties with Moscow.
Relations between the two former Cold War foes deteriorated after a warm start under the presidency of George W. Bush amid disputes over the proposed US missile defense shield and the Russia-Georgia war last year.{end of article}
Some smart analysts think the talks will go badly, since these problems have only gotten worse. This meeting might serve as a good cover, by saying, "I tried to work things out.", for starting hostilities back up. The problem is that the amount and lethality of the weaponry has escalated.
Fair enough with regards to the military-industrial complex. However, don't expect our problems to "just go away." That's rather naive of you.
Not really. Just getting rid of "state secrecy" would uncover enough stuff we could use.
I will demand a retraction from you. It will be interesting to see what sort of rationalization I get in its place.
I think I can commit to that. What would you accept as a reasonable substitute for "nukes"? How about the tunnel being put out of commission for a year? That's the objective, and they are prepared to use nukes, if necessary.