• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Scientology Exposé from the St Petersburg Times

I wonder if these e-meters have a fuse. If so, it would be neat to use trickery to make the fuse fail every time you grab the leads. I'd experiment on my fluke, but it's my fluke and I don't want to buy another.
 
I had a friend who got into the mid to high levels of Scientology (I'm not sure which, but he moved to headquarters in California ) and he let me in on the "big secret" that Lron was actually divine, a reincarnation of Buddah. The impression I get is that once the devotees are "clear" enough, they will believe almost anything.
 
While Operation Clambake is a far better resource for anyone interesting in the facts behind scientology, www(dot)xenu(dot)net, it never hurts to add a little levity to things from time to time.

So, I'll just leave this here,
www(dot)cracked(dot)com/article_16337_l-ron-hubbards-5-most-impressive-lies-besides-scientology(dot)html

One of there newer articles features scientology's newest potential celebrity recruits.
www(dot)cracked(dot)com/article_17448_scientologys-5-newest-celebrity-recruits(dot)html

I can't imagine how this cult has survived so long (and I now await the inevitable lawsuit that statement will bring.)
 
I wonder if these e-meters have a fuse. If so, it would be neat to use trickery to make the fuse fail every time you grab the leads. I'd experiment on my fluke, but it's my fluke and I don't want to buy another.

The e meter article on Wikipedia is interesting:

The E-meter has undergone many changes since it was invented by Volney Mathison, an early collaborator with Hubbard. The Mathison Electropsychometer (as it was then called) was adopted for use in Dianetics and Scientology by Hubbard in the early 1950s,[8] before being temporarily dropped in 1954 during a dispute with Mathison.
In a quote from Bent Corydon's Messiah or Madman?,
It was the Mathison E-Meter, and Mathison was determined to keep it that way. So in late 1954 the use of the E-meter was discontinued by Hubbard. Wrote Hubbard: "Yesterday, we used an instrument called an E-Meter to register whether or not the process was still getting results so that the auditor would know how long to continue it. While the E-Meter is an interesting investigation instrument and has played its part in research, it is not today used by the auditor... As we long ago suspected, the intervention of a mechanical gadget between the auditor and the preclear had a tendency to depersonalize the session..." [9]
In 1958 when Scientologists Don Breeding and Joe Wallis developed a modified, smaller battery-operated version, which they presented to Hubbard, he again used it. This was christened the Hubbard electrometer. Hubbard patented it on December 6, 1966, as a "Device for Measuring and Indicating Changes in the Resistance of a Human Body" (U.S. Patent 3,290,589). The patent is now expired and in the public domain. The Church of Scientology continues to make, sell, and teach its use in auditing.
Mathison never litigated the appropriation of his invention, but was bitter and disillusioned about Hubbard. In 1964 Mathison stated: "I decry the doings of trivial fakers, such as scientologists and the like, who glibly denounce hypnosis and then try covertly to use it in their phony systems."[citation needed]
Today, models of the E-meter include the Mark V, the Mark VI and the Mark VII. As of January 2005, the cost of the Mark V was $900 and the Mark VII Super Quantum E-meter was US $4,650.00 (up from US $3,850 in 1995).[citation needed] Scientologists of the Free Zone have developed their own E-meter models which are available at much lower prices. They also offer circuit diagrams and instructions for building a meter.[citation needed]
The patent link above has an e meter schematic.
 
RS2-45 auditing only costs about 50 cents, and you can complete the whole course in milliseconds.

For the benefit of others, and since it's fairly obvious Fred will not answer the question:

R2-45 is a Scientology auditing process created by L. Ron Hubbard. The process of R2-45 specifically pertains to shooting the target with a Colt .45 pistol, causing the victim's "thetan" to leave the body (exteriorization).

R2-45: AN ENORMOUSLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS FOR EXTERIORIZATION BUT ITS USE IS FROWNED UPON BY THIS SOCIETY AT THIS TIME. ”

—L. Ron Hubbard, The Creation of Human Ability
(all caps as per the original)
 
Last edited:
Don't keep us in suspense. It looks like Fred will ignore any contrary information, so why don't you tell us what RS2-45 auditing is?

Shooting.

With a .45 gun.

For "difficult cases."


And hey, they believe all this does is "release your thetan" and so no harm is done.

Nice, huh?

For the benefit of others, and since it's fairly obvious Fred will not asnwer the question:

R2-45 is a Scientology auditing process created by L. Ron Hubbard. The process of R2-45 specifically pertains to shooting the target with a Colt .45 pistol, causing the victim's "thetan" to leave the body (exteriorization).

R2-45: AN ENORMOUSLY EFFECTIVE PROCESS FOR EXTERIORIZATION BUT ITS USE IS FROWNED UPON BY THIS SOCIETY AT THIS TIME. ”

—L. Ron Hubbard, The Creation of Human Ability
(all caps as per the original)

Anything you would care to add or comment on regarding this, Fred?
 
Not really. Just really busy at work right now getting a project done. (Late nights and all.)


Where do you work? What's the project? Just curious. If you consider it private, nevermind.
 
Not really. Just really busy at work right now getting a project done. (Late nights and all.)

Understand. Most of us do have work to do.

So, when you have some free time, would you care to comment on RS2-45? Any thoughts or anything about it you'd like to share?
 
You won't understand unless you're a Scientologist. And if you're an ex-Scientologist, you're just telling lies about it.
 
I appreciate everyone answering, but I really want to know from fredcarr: Why are the apostates of Scientology portrayed as such terrible human beings?
 
So, when you have some free time, would you care to comment on RS2-45?
I think your referring to Routine-45. (I could be wrong.) That was a joke which it clearly says in the book in which it was mentioned. (At least in my copy it says its a joke.)

More times than I care to mention have I been asked on the net about things taken out of context. By individuals who refuse to read the original materials no less. It's rather tiresome.
 
Last edited:
Why are the apostates of Scientology portrayed as such terrible human beings?

I didn't know that they were. Why am I portrayed as such a terrible human being by some apostates? Probably a equally difficult question to answer.

If your going to lie about me, insult me (not to mention my family and friends), etc. then I would imagine I have the right to comment back. (I usually don't but I think I have the right.)

I certainly don't have to answer to every allegation made against me and mine.
 
I didn't know that they were. Why am I portrayed as such a terrible human being by some apostates? Probably a equally difficult question to answer.

If your going to lie about me, insult me (not to mention my family and friends), etc. then I would imagine I have the right to comment back. (I usually don't but I think I have the right.)

I certainly don't have to answer to every allegation made against me and mine.

So apostates are liars. Nice going first you claim no knowledge of apostates being demonized and then you do it.

Be careful your head doesn't contact your posterior going around those logical switchbacks.
 

Back
Top Bottom