29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

[NWO Sentryman]

Do you really think the NWO is a real organization, or did your mom give you that name?

I am a gatekeeper for the nwo.

The truth is that Professional wrestling rules the World.

That was why Jesse Ventura managed to get the governorship of minnesota in 2000. The NWO gave it to him.

 

[Christopher7]

Also, don't forget that the majority of engineers and scientists on my list, were ACTUALLY INVOLVED in the investigation, instead of armchairing/Monday Morning QBing it, like those Galileo's list.

TAM

Involved in the investigation does NOT mean they endorsed the final report.

How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?
References please.

 

[Galileo]

Involved in the investigation does NOT mean they endorsed the final report.

How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?
References please.

Good point, Christopher.

Another example is the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

George Mason, Edmund Randolph, and Elbridge Gerry were involved in framing the Constitution, but refused to sign the final report.

13 other Founding Fathers who attended the convention did not sign it as well.

The debunkers have an agenda to deceive.

 

[Justin39640]

Involved in the investigation does NOT mean they endorsed the final report.

How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?
References please.

actually some do not agree with the NIST's conclusions
but what they do agree on is that there is no evidence whatsoever that explosives where used

from: http://wtc.nist.gov/comments08/CTBUHwtc7comments.pdf

The Council does not agree with the NIST statement that the failure was a
result of the buckling of Column 79. We believe that the failure was a result of
the collapse of the floor structure that led to loss of lateral restraint and
subsequent buckling of internal columns.
The Council would like to make it clear that it sees no credibility whatsoever in
the 911 ‘truth movement’ and we believe, with the vast majority of tall building
professionals, that all the failures at the WTC (WTC 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7) were a
direct or indirect result of the planes that were flown into the two towers. We
have carefully looked at the evidence that the 911 ‘truth movement’ presents
and we cannot see any credible scientific evidence of a controlled demolition
on WTC 7 or any of the other WTC buildings. The Council considers that the
‘truth movement’ is a distraction and should not obfuscate the performance
issues which should be at the center of the debate about how best to continue
to improve and develop fire and life safety in tall buildings.

 

[beachnut]

The OP (opening post) had the failed idea that 29 people with nut case ideas on 911 are better than evidence and reality. The OP calls the 29 people with dirt dumb conclusions on 911 experts. Not one of them is qualified to figure out 911 and their rants of explosives, and thermite make them a few fringe people who love to promote lies about 911.

The real experts studied 911 and their conclusions and reality prove the 29 people with nut case ideas on 911 are wrong. Not sure why the 29 people have no evidence but it seems standard for those who defend the 19 terrorist by blaming unknown others (usually PNAC and Dick Cheney until his wife took away his shotgun). What a pathetic OP.

Expert who OPENLY support the official account of 9/11:

------

MIT scientists:

Eduardo Kausel
Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering - MIT
* C.E. 1967, University of Chile
* M.S. 1972, MIT
* Sc.D. 1974, MIT

John E. Fernandez
Associate Professor of Building Technology - MIT
1989--MArch, Princeton University
1985--BSAD, MIT
Awards or Positions:
2003--Honorable Mention, International Competition for the Design of Ephemeral Structures
2002--Hass Award: Laminated Glass Research
2002--Class of 1957 Career Development Professorship
2001--Graduate Student Council Award for Teaching
2001--American Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Service Award for Conference Co-Chair of the 2000 ACSA Technology Conference
2000--3M Innovation Award
1998--New York City AIA: Design Citation, Columbia University Law School with Polshek and Partners
1998--New York State AIA: Design Citation, Columbia University Law School with Polshek and Partners
1998--New York State AIA: Design Citation, New York Times Printing Plant with Polshek and Partners
1988--Master's Thesis Prize, Princeton University, School of Architecture: Butler Traveling Fellowship

Tomasz Wierzbicki
Professor of Applied Mechanics Director, Impact and Crashworthiness Laboratory - MIT
Ph.D. in Applied Mechanics, 1965 Institute of Fundamental Technological
Research, Warsaw, Poland
S.M. in Engine Design, 1960 Warsaw Technical University, Warsaw, Poland
B.S. I took a unified program that led directly to the Master of Science
Awards or Positions:
Maximilian T. Huber Award for the best work in Mechanics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1974
Chairman of the Euromech Colloquium No. 121 on "Dynamics and Crushing of Plastic Structures", 1978
Chairman of the Summer School on "Dynamics of Plastic Structures", International Center for Mechanical Sciences, Udine, Italy, 1979
Polish Academy of Sciences award for the book "Design of Structures to Dynamic Loads", 1979
Co-chair, First International Symposium, "Structural Crashworthiness", UK, 1983
Co-chair, Second International Symposium, "Structural Failure", Cambridge, MA, 1988
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Senior US Scientist Award, 1988-1989
Co-chair, Third International Symposium, "Structural Crashworthiness and Failure", UK, 1993
Member of the Editorial Boards of the International Journal of Impact Engineering and International Journal of Vehicle Design

Liang Xue
Ph.D. Candidate of Mechanical Engineering - MIT
BS in Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1994
BS in Computer Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1994
MS in Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1997
MS in Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003
Awards or Positions:
Wunsch Foundation Silent Hoist and Crane Award, 2006;
Ziqiang Award , 1997 ;
Guanghua Award , 1996 ;
Outstanding Graduate , 1994 ;
Outstanding Performance Award , 1991-4;
Model Student , 1993 ;
Outstanding Student , 1992

Meg Hendry-Brogan
Ocean Engineering Graduate Student - MIT

Ahmed F. Ghoniem
Professor of Mechanical Engineering - MIT
B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, July 1973, Cairo University, Egypt
M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, October 1975, Cairo University, Egypt
Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, June 1980 , University of California, Berkeley
Awards or Positions:
Sep. 83 - Current Department Undergraduate Faculty Advisor
Sep. 84 - Sep. 87 Department Graduate Committee
Department Graduate Advisor
Sep. 85 - Sep. 90 Mathematics Minor Advisor
Sep. 85 - June 86 Department Seminar Chairman
Sep. 87 - Sept. 88 Department Admission Committee
Sep. 90 - Current Computers in Education
Nov. 91 - Jan. 92 Ad hoc Committee on Promotion
1991 –1992 Committee to establish PEEER
Jan. 92 Current Department Admissions Committee
Jan. 90 - May 94 SAL Seminar Series
Jan. 94 - June 94 Search Committee Chair
Jan. 94 - 1995 Ad hoc Committee on the Core Development
Jan. 94 - Current Space Committee
Sep. 95 - June 98 Committee on Undergraduate Programs
June 96 - Current Head of Thermo Fluids Sciences Division
Sep 99 - Sep 00 Committee on Curricula, member
Sep 00 Committee on Curricula, Chair

Oral Buyukozturk
Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering - MIT
* Ph.D. 1970, Cornell University
* M.S. 1969, Cornell University
* M.S.C.E. 1963, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
Awards or Positions:
Infrastructure Science and Technology Group

Franz-Josef Ulm
Professor of Engineering Mechanics and Materials - MIT
* Diplom Ingenieur (M.Sc.) 1990, TU Munich
* Docteur-Ingenieur (Ph.D.) 1994, ENPC, Paris
* Habilitation 1998, ENS de Cachan

Yossi Sheffi
Professor of Engineering Systems - MIT
B.Sc. Technion in Israel - 1975
S.M. - MIT, 1977
Ph.D - MIT 1978
Awards or Positions:
Director of the MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics
Founder: MIT Master of Engineering in Logistics program
Founder: MIT:Zaragoza Program
Plaza2006 Award
Distinguished Service Award (Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals) - 1997
Life Fellow of Cambridge University's Clare Hall College

---------

NIST scientists:

Dr. H.S. Lew – Senior Research Engineer. PhD Civil Engineering, BS in Architectural Engineering. ASCE Fellow.
With NIST: Structural Engineering, Earthquake Engineering, Building and Fire Research.
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...p?lastname=Lew
(his full profile)

Richard W. Bukowski – Senior Research Engineer. BSc Electrical Engineering.
With NIST: Co-ordinator of Building and Fire Research Lab.
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...tname=bukowski
(his full profile)

Dr. Fahim H. Sadek – PhD Mechanical Engineering SMU
With NIST: Research Structural Engineer
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...lastname=sadek
(his full profile)

Dr. Frank W. Gayle – PhD Metallurgy MIT, MSc Materials Science, BSc Civil Engineering.
http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/wtc_profiles.asp?lastname=gayle
(his full profile)

Dr. David D. Evans – PhD in Engineering (Fire protection)


Dr. William Grosshandler – PhD Mechanical Engineering UC Berkley
With NIST: Head of Building and Fire Research
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...e=grosshandler
(his full profile)

Dr. Richard G. Gann – PhD Physical Chemistry MIT
With NIST: Senior Research Scientist – Integrated Performance Assessment
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...?lastname=gann
(his full profile)

Dr. John L. Gross – PhD Structural Engineering, BSc/MSc Civil Engineering Cornell
With NIST: Research Engineer – Materials and Construction Research Division
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...lastname=gross
(his full profile)

Dr. Therese P. McAllister – PhD Structural Engineering John Hopkins
With NIST: Senior Structural Engineer.
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...ame=mcallister
(her full profile)

Jason D. Averill – MSc Structural Engineering (working on PhD) John Hopkins
With NIST: Research Engineer
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...stname=averill
(his full profile)

J. Randall Lawson – BA, BSc Industrial Education, AA Computer Science and Math
With NIST: General Physical Scientist
http://www2.bfrl.nist.gov/profiles/p...astname=lawson
(his full profile)

Shyam Sunder, Sc.D.
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, B. Tech., (Honors), Civil Engineering, 1977
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, S.M., Civil Engineering, 1979
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sc.D., Structural Engineering, 1981

James Quintiere, Ph.D. professor of engineering, University of Maryland
Educated as a mechanical engineer
B.S. degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology (1962)
M.S. (1966), Ph.D. (1970) from New York University.
http://www.enfp.umd.edu/faculty-profiles/quintiere.html



---------

FEMA/ASCE Pentagon Team Scientists/Engineers
--------------------------------------------

Mete A. Sozen, Ph.D., S.E.
Kettlehut Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering, Purdue University
Specialty: Behavior of reinforced-concrete structures

Paul F. Mlakar, Ph.D., P.E.
Team Leader
Technical Director, Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Specialty: Blast-resistant design

Donald O. Dusenberry, P.E.
Principal, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc.
Specialty: Blast effects and structural design

James R. Harris, Ph.D., P.E.
Principal, J.R. Harris & Company
Specialty: Structural engineering

Long T. Phan, Ph.D., P.E.
Research Structural Engineer, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Specialty: Concrete, structural and fire engineering

Gerald Haynes, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
Specialty: Fire protection


FEMA/ASCE WTC Team Scientists/Engineers
---------------------------------------


W. Gene Corley, Ph.D., P.E., Lead
Senior Vice President
Construction Technologies Laboratories, Skokie, Illinois
Expert in building collapse investigations; principal investigator, Murrah Federal Office Building Study.

William Baker, P.E., S.E. Partner
Skidmore Owings & Merrill LLP
Expert in tall-building design.


Jonathan Barnett, Ph.D.
Professor, Center for Fire Safety Studies
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
Expert in building fire safety design and fire computer modeling.


David T. Biggs, P.E.
Ryan-Biggs Associates, Troy, New York
Expert in facades.

Bill Coulbourne, P.E., S.E.
Principal
URS Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland

Edward M. DePaola, P.E.
Partner
Severud Associates Consulting Engineers, New York, New York
Expert in structural engineering.

Robert F. Duval
Senior Fire Investigator
National Fire Protection Association
Expert in fire investigations.

Dan Eschenasy
Chief, Structural Engineering
City of New York
Dept of Design and Construction

John T. Fisher, P.E.
Joseph T. Stuart Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Expert in metallurgy and connections.

Richard G. Gewain
Senior Engineer
Hughes Associates, Inc., Baltimore
Expert in fire engineering.

Ramon Gilsanz
Managing Partner
Gilsanz Murray Steficek, New York, New York
Expert in structural engineering.

John L. Gross, Ph.D., P.E.
Leader
Structural Systems and Design Group Building and Fire Research Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
Expert in steel design and fire-structure interaction.

Ronald Hamburger, P.E., S.E.
Senior Vice President
EQE Structural Engineers Division, ABS Consulting, Belmont, California
Expert in structural analysis and design.

Nestor Iwankiw
Vice President, Engineering and Research
American Institute for Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois
Expert in steel design.

Venkatesh Kodur, Ph.D., P.E.
Institute for Research in Construction
National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
Expert in fire effects on materials.

Eric Letvin
Department Head, Hazards Engineering Group
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Greenbelt, Maryland

Jon Magnusson, P.E.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire, Inc., Seattle, Washington
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design.

Christopher E. Marrion, P.E.
Fire Strategist
Arup Fire, New York, New York
Expert in fire engineering.

Therese P. McAllister, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Structural Engineer
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Greenbelt, Maryland

James Milke, Ph. D., P.E.
Professor, Department of Fire Protection Engineering
University of Maryland
Expert in fire resistance analysis.

Harold E. "Bud" Nelson
Senior Research Engineer
Hughes Associates, Inc.

James A. Rossberg, P.E.
Director, Structural Engineering Institute
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, Virginia

Saw-Teen See, P.E.
Managing Partner
Leslie E. Robertson Associates, New York, New York
Expert in structural analysis and high-rise design.

Robert Smilowitz
Principal
Weidlinger Associates, New York, New York
Expert in blast effects.

Bruce Swiren
Hurricane Program Manager, Region II
Federal Emergency Management Agency, New York, New York

Paul Tertell, P.E.
Program Manager, Building Performance Assessment Team
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

--------------

Allyn E. Kilsheimer, P.E. CEO, KCE Structural Engineers PC
(first structural engineer to arrive at Pentagon crash site)

Christoph Hoffmann, Ph.D.
Professor of Computer Science - Purdue
Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, 1974.
(worked on comp models of Pentagon)


Dr Asif Usmani
Structural engineering Professor
University of Edinburgh
http://www.civ.ed.ac.uk/research/fire/asif.html

TAM

Oops we have whole group of engineers who also think the OP is full of junk.

I think you mean 29 to 130,000

I found only 0.00087 percent of all engineers support the failed ideas supported by the 29 people from the OP with failed ideas on 911.

I also found Robertson the top expert on the WTC finds they ideas of the 29 to be wrong. Robertson's paper in a real journal can be found here.
http://www.nae.edu/cms/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/7344.aspx

The top structural engineer on the WTC wins this argument as all 29 of the OP people are not qualified on the matter. The OP 29 people failed to check with Robertson to see their ideas are moronic. How can people support the delusions of those 29 people? Not with evidence, they will talk and never post evidence.

29 people have failed ideas a grade school education prove wrong
29 people lie about 911
29 people no one can support with evidence
And this is their A-game 911truthlies

 

[Christopher7]

actually some do not agree with the NIST's conclusions
but what they do agree on is that there is no evidence whatsoever that explosives where used

from: http://wtc.nist.gov/comments08/CTBUHwtc7comments.pdf

You mentioned people who do not endorse the NIST final report on WTC 7. They have some reservations.
The question was:
How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?

Beachnut: You posted a list of names but no reference to their statements endorsing the NIST Final reports on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7.

 

[DGM]

You mentioned people who do not endorse the NIST final report on WTC 7. They have some reservations.
The question was:
How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?

Beachnut: You posted a list of names but no reference to their statements endorsing the NIST Final reports on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7.

So they all just keep quite even though (as you say) it's blatantly wrong?

 

[twinstead]

You mentioned people who do not endorse the NIST final report on WTC 7. They have some reservations.
The question was:
How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?

Beachnut: You posted a list of names but no reference to their statements endorsing the NIST Final reports on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7.

So now they have to explicitly "State" that they endorse the NIST final report, regardless of if their names are on it, or we just "can't be sure", right?

Again, you present a simple debate tactic when confronted by the HUGE number of very qualified people who worked on the report. It's all you have. Now I'll give you an opening to use some other tried-and-true spinning: why do YOU think none of those experts has come out and claimed that the plane crashes and subsequent fires alone were not enough to make the buildings collapse, and they suspect foul play? Are they afraid of loosing their pensions or tenure?

 

[Christopher7]

So now they have to explicitly "State" that they endorse the NIST final report, regardless of if their names are on it, or we just "can't be sure", right?

Right. Contributing to the report does NOT constitute endorsing the final product.

Again, you present a simple debate tactic when confronted by the HUGE number of very qualified people who worked on the report.

Right again. I asked you to back up the claim that these people endorsed the Final report which came out after they made their specific contributions.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

I've stayed out of this thread for good reason up to now. but I'm compelled ask why the **** these truthers are blabbering numbers as any indication of credibility in their fraudulent claims? And why the **** should I give a damn about the opinions just because they come from supposed "experts" if their opinions demonstrate no such knowledge that their professional titles should mandate they have?

Ae911truth is full of frauds, or incompetents, nothing more needs to be said. I've seen enough of their presentations to judge that they have nothing of value to add to my education. The changes to the building codes, and the extensive studies of the WTC collapses in the design phases of later buildings speak volumes about the position held by the world wide engineering community. Requiring them to explicitly advertise their "support" for a so called "official story" is nothing but an excuse made by sheer arrogance of people who have no business speaking on these matters.

I've had my say... later...

 

[DGM]

Oh Chris7:
Why do you suppose no one's making a big deal about this considering (as you say ) it's so wrong? We're talking about a lot of people.

 

[Christopher7]

Oh Chris7:
Why do you suppose no one's making a big deal about this considering (as you say ) it's so wrong? We're talking about a lot of people .

There are a lot of people 'making a big deal about this'.

One of the people T.A.M. listed as endorsing the Final report on the towers is saying just the opposite.

[FONT=&quot]James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.[/FONT]
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm

Where are the statements of qualified people endorsing the NIST final reports on the Trade Towers and WTC 7?

 

[twinstead]

There are a lot of people 'making a big deal about this'.

One of the people T.A.M. listed as endorsing the Final report on the towers is saying just the opposite.

[FONT=&quot]James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.[/FONT]
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm

Where are the statements of qualified people endorsing the NIST final reports on the Trade Towers and WTC 7?

Do you think Quintiere thinks 911 was an inside job? Do you think he disagrees that the fires and plane crashes were enough to fell the buildings?

 

[FineWine]

You mentioned people who do not endorse the NIST final report on WTC 7. They have some reservations.
The question was:
How many engineers and scientists have stated they endorse the NIST Final report on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7?

Beachnut: You posted a list of names but no reference to their statements endorsing the NIST Final reports on the Trade Towers and/or WTC 7.

You, of course, miss the point. While some researchers, e.g. James Quintiere and Professor Astaneh, believe the towers would have come down even if the fireproofing had not been dislodged, there is no disagreement in the engineering community over the broad conclusions reached by NIST. Both Quintiere and Astaneh regard "truthers" as idiots and liars. Your nonsensical myth about explosives is not supported by a shred of evidence. Nobody who works in the demolition industry takes you seriously.

 

[twinstead]

Right. Contributing to the report does NOT constitute endorsing the final product.

Right again. I asked you to back up the claim that these people endorsed the Final report which came out after they made their specific contributions.

Why don't you contact them? The fact they contributed, and haven't complained that they think the plane impact and fires weren't responsible for the buildings collapses, is good enough for me. The fact that the world's engineering organizations aren't shouting their disagreement from the rooftops, and freaking building codes are being changed because of the report is good enough for me. Christ, it's good enough for ANY rational person. It's not good enough for you? Too bad. You're just a member of a tiny minority of ideologues and paranoids that barely exists.

Like I said. A simple debate tactic.

 

[Christopher7]

I've stayed out of this thread for good reason up to now. but I'm compelled ask why the **** these truthers are blabbering numbers as any indication of credibility in their fraudulent claims? And why the **** should I give a damn about the opinions just because they come from supposed "experts" if their opinions demonstrate no such knowledge that their professional titles should mandate they have?

Why do you give a damn about the opinions just because they come from "experts" at NIST? Blind faith in scientific reports from an administration that systematically distorts scientific reports is not warranted or wise.

Requiring them to explicitly advertise their "support" for a so called "official story" is nothing but an excuse made by sheer arrogance of people who have no business speaking on these matters.

T.A.M. claimed that the people on the list he provided were "Expert who OPENLY support the official account of 9/11:

One says just the opposite and none have been quoted as endorsing the Final report.

 

[DGM]

There are a lot of people 'making a big deal about this'.

One of the people T.A.M. listed as endorsing the Final report on the towers is saying just the opposite.

[FONT=&quot]James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.[/FONT]
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alan_mil_070820_former_chief_of_nist.htm

Where are the statements of qualified people endorsing the NIST final reports on the Trade Towers and WTC 7?

And what does he believe brought down the buildings? (don't be afraid you can say it).

PS You didn't answer my question.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Blind faith in scientific reports from an administration that systematically distorts scientific reports is not warranted or wise.

.

There's a difference which escapes some people who are comprehensively challenged; Expertise is demonstrated, not brandished as a title. Results aren't spoken through mumbers, they're spoken loud through action; the changes which came about as a direct result of reports done by NIST and other institutions. If your hatred for Bush and your inexperience with engineering is your only justification for not seeing eye to eye with the report's content, then I'm afraid you'll have to embark on an alternative hobby.

 

[Christopher7]

Why don't you contact them?

Richard Gage is doing just that. Most of the building professionals who hear his presentation agree with him when he has finished.

The fact they contributed, and haven't complained that they think the plane impact and fires weren't responsible for the buildings collapses, is good enough for me. The fact that the world's engineering organizations aren't shouting their disagreement from the rooftops, and freaking building codes are being changed because of the report is good enough for me.

The former chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, James Quintiere PhD, has called for an independent investigation just like Richard Gage.

You have just admitted by omission that you don't know of any qualified people, other than the authors, who endorse the Final report.

 

[Christopher7]

[FONT=&quot]James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.

[/FONT]Where are the statements of qualified people endorsing the NIST final reports on the Trade Towers and WTC 7?

And what does he believe brought down the buildings? (don't be afraid you can say it).

PS You didn't answer my question.

Ah, yes. When you have nothing to offer to support the false statement made by T.A.M., just change the subject. You ask me to answer your question but you will not answer mine honestly. Please admit that there are no qualified persons who endorse the NIST Final reports other than the authors.