• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

Galileo said:
Can you name even one structural engineer not part of the 9/11 debunker movement who supports your claims?
Click to expand...


"Truthers" claimed that Matthys Levy, co-author of the book Why Buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fail, was supportive of their absurd myths. It turned out that they lied. Levy despises "truthers" as dishonest idiots.
 
Galileo said:
Robertson is part of the debunker movement, hardless an unbiased source.
Click to expand...

Yes, every structural engineer who isn't insane is opposed to the "truth" movement. Incidentally, I must state--again--that I am not a structural engineer and have never claimed to be one.
 
Could someone please post links to the engineering papers that any of these 29 have created.

Thanks.
 
Galileo said:
Robertson is part of the debunker movement, hardless an unbiased source.
Click to expand...


As usual, it appears that a biased source is simply one that you disagree with, regardless of the credentials presented. The guy BUILT the freaking towers!
 
Galileo said:
Robertson is part of the debunker movement, hardless an unbiased source.
Click to expand...

You seem to consider knowledge of facts and possession of relevant expertise as "bias".

Your 28 "engineers" are janitors for all we know.
 
Last edited:
Galileo said:
Robertson is part of the debunker movement, hardless an unbiased source.
Click to expand...
Wrong big time; he knows uncontrolled fires after the impacts of jets at high speed, 7 to 11 time greater than his design impact, doomed the buildings. You are not Galileo; if you were you could understand science. You degrade the name with orders of magnitude in stupid statements and lies on 911.

Robertson built the WTC and the terrorists you apologize for destroyed it. Robertson is like Galileo and you are the anti-Galileo.

You don't know anything about Robertson you just post junk.
http://www.nae.edu/cms/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/7344.aspx

http://www.nae.edu/cms/Publications/TheBridge/Archives/7344/7480.aspx

http://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=7345 The paper is here in pdf form.
 
Last edited:
NWO Sentryman said:
I think he lost all credibility after his debate with Gravy on Hardfire.

Somehow, i dont think cardboard boxes fit in a scientific presentation...
Click to expand...

Gage was following the lead of Galileo, who introduced experimentation to science, rather than sit around and speculate.

:cool:
 
Galileo said:
Gage was following the lead of Galileo, who introduced experimentation to science, rather than sit around and speculate.

:cool:
Click to expand...

Galileo would spin in his grave faster than the earth spinning around the sun.

Towers are completely different from cardboard boxes, in terms of structure, design and height. It is like me saying a small plane can be used to simulate the plane crashes.

Experimentation was taking place for years before galileo. Aristotle, Copernicus, Da Vinci etc.

Nist, Gravy, JREF have all created computer simulations of the WTC's destruction.

There is some good stuff on JREF about 9/11.

Oh, BTW, in experimentation, you have to repeat at least twice to confirm it. Double or triple validation is vital in these fields. I am speaking as a student computer technician who has an interest in these fields, but i do not claim to be an expert.
 
1337m4n said:
But Gage hasn't done any experiments.
Click to expand...

Sure he has. :D

Gagebox-full-full.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom