29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

[Mr.Herbert]

 

[FineWine]

Galileo is the father of modern science, engineering, and technology.

And you ain't Galileo.

 

[Macgyver1968]

Galileo is the father of modern science, engineering, and technology.

Yes he was...but guess what?..you ain't him!

 

[BigAl]

Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

Well then, your opinion of this announcement counts for nothing.

The engineers here, including me, think this is just one more Truth Movement joke.

 

[Drudgewire]

And you ain't Galileo.

I still propose it's easier to believe than buying Ultima1 as an employee of the NSA.

 

[FineWine]

We thank Galileo for another stroll down Memory Lane. Let's remind him that last year's thread on Gage's recycled idiocy established that Nathan Lomba is not a structual engineer at all. He has a degree in Civil Engineering.

 

[tuc0]

Damn! Well, it was fun while it lasted

 

[rwguinn]

thread is spam. Reported

 

[FineWine]

I still propose it's easier to believe than buying Ultima1 as an employee of the NSA.

It's less scary.

 

[Galileo]

and he spins in his grave as you impersonate him

Do you believe in life after death? I don't. As this is a rational forum, I suspect the rest of us find such a notion pretty wacky.

 

[Galileo]

Oops, you have Charles N. Pegelow, Civil Engineer; what did he do change light bulbs? You are down one structural engineer. 28. Prove Charles built high rise building like a 110 story building and you may have something if he were not so darn old, stupid and biased.

You are down to 28 dolts on 911 issues. Next

I have Robertson the chief structural engineer of the WTC and you have a bunch of zeros, Charlie here is not a structural engineer.

OK, so you admit that you lose 28 to 2. Nothing that I would brag about.

 

[Justin39640]

Do you believe in life after death? I don't. As this is a rational forum, I suspect the rest of us find such a notion pretty wacky.

do you believe in figures of speech? lol

you lost 1000000 to 28

 

[lapman]

So you have a bunch of engineers that did not do one shred of research beyond the ae911 site. When I see things like "freefall speed" and "jet fuel cannot melt steel," all I can do is laugh at how out of touch they are. So, since those "structural engineers" opinions are based on lies, their opinions are invalid.

 

[beachnut]

OK, so you admit that you lose 28 to 2. Nothing that I would brag about.

You have 29 nut case ideas on 911. You lost on 911.

These failed engineers with moronic ideas (like you being Galileo) you believe, lack the knowledge to figure out 911.

You have 29 failed engineers who can't figure out 911; gee, it does not take an engineer to figure out 911, the Passengers on Flight 93 figured out 911 in minutes and your group of idiots can't figure out 911 in 7 years. Not one of your dolts has worked structural engineering in high-rise buildings; they are failed people who believe the same moronic lies about 911 you do.

You have zero evidence and millions of trained engineers who think you and your ideas are poppycock.

Support one of the moronic ideas with evidence. You never do present evidence, you post lies and stupid copy and past junk from idiotic site which lie about 911.

here is your evidnece...

...

 

[scissorhands]

OK, so you admit that you lose 28 to 2. Nothing that I would brag about.

You are doing a great job of making the "truth movement" look even more pathetic and delusional.
If thats even possible.
Do you enjoy the humiliation?

 

[FineWine]

OK, so you admit that you lose 28 to 2. Nothing that I would brag about.

Gage's "news" was first published over a year ago. Not one of his frauds will ever debate a real engineer. The evidence for demolition remains nonexistent.

Sounds like it's a slow day, huh, sport?

 

[Galileo]

You have 29 nut case ideas on 911. You lost on 911.

These failed engineers with moronic ideas (like you being Galileo) you believe, lack the knowledge to figure out 911.

You have 29 failed engineers who can't figure out 911; gee, it does not take an engineer to figure out 911, the Passengers on Flight 93 figured out 911 in minutes and your group of idiots can't figure out 911 in 7 years. Not one of your dolts has worked structural engineering in high-rise buildings; they are failed people who believe the same moronic lies about 911 you do.

You have zero evidence and millions of trained engineers who think you and your ideas are poppycock.

Support one of the moronic ideas with evidence. You never do present evidence, you post lies and stupid copy and past junk from idiotic site which lie about 911.

here is your evidnece...

Can you name even one structural engineer not part of the 9/11 debunker movement who supports your claims?

 

[beachnut]

Can you name even one structural engineer not part of the 9/11 debunker movement who supports your claims?

Robertson built the WTC. He thinks your moronic ideas are poppycock. You posted junk ideas and the people who made them up.

I have the person who understands the structure of the WTC and you have guys who did not build past the first floor. You have failed engineers who believe in nut case conspiracy theories. When will you join the world of reality and stop posting as if you were Galileo who now is a CTer who believes idiotic ideas on 911.

There are a few structural engineers here but you have been open-loop posting dirt dumb statements and failed to stop and find out. You lack evidence and knowledge on 911 issues making you unable to mount a substantive argument for your failed ideas.

http://www.lera.com/robertson.htm

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/ser...00009000001000046000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

 

[HyJinX]

OK, so you admit that you lose 28 to 2. Nothing that I would brag about.

More evidence that shows that for the 9/11 deniers...this is all about who wins or loses...not about the available evidence or the deaths of 3000 people.

Stay classy Galileo.

 

[Galileo]

Robertson built the WTC. He thinks your moronic ideas are poppycock.

I have the person who understands the structure of the WTC and you have guys who did not build past the first floor. You have failed engineers who believe in nut case conspiracy theories. When will you join the world of reality and stop posting as if you were Galileo who now is a CTer who believes idiotic ideas on 911.

There are a few structural engineers here but you have been open-loop posting dirt dumb statements and failed to stop and find out. You lack evidence and knowledge on 911 issues making you unable to mount a substantive argument for your failed ideas.

http://www.lera.com/robertson.htm

Robertson is part of the debunker movement, hardless an unbiased source.