• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition

Galileo

Illuminator
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
3,368
Jun 17, 2009
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
— Gregg Roberts and Staff

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early

"Something is wrong with this picture," thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings' responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, "How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?"...

read more...

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/64

http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf

This seals the deal. The experts have spoken.
 
Jun 17, 2009
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
— Gregg Roberts and Staff

More than 700 architects and engineers have joined call for new investigation, faulting official collapse reports

The facts are in. The evidence is conclusive. These experts lay it all out.

For Some, the Doubts Began Early

"Something is wrong with this picture," thought Nathan Lomba, as he watched replays of the Twin Tower collapses on television on September 11, 2001. A licensed structural engineer trained in buildings' responses to stress, Lomba saw more on the screen than you or I. He puzzled, "How did the structures collapse in near-symmetrical fashion when the damage was clearly not symmetrical?"...

read more...

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/64

http://www.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf

This seals the deal. The experts have spoken.



Yes, the deal was sealed long ago. The experts HAVE spoken. Gage's gaggle of frauds is a bad joke.
 
Yes, the deal was sealed long ago. The experts HAVE spoken. Gage's gaggle of frauds is a bad joke.

Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:Dancing_laugh::Dancing_cool:
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:Dancing_laugh::Dancing_cool:
all the engineers who put their names on the NIST report might have something to say about your numbers game
 
all the engineers who put their names on the NIST report might have something to say about your numbers game

The NIST report was written before the thermite was discovered. It is an outmoded report.

You need to cite a report that is up to date with the latest scientific findings. Fail.
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

...
How often is the sky falling in your world of moronic ideas on 911?

You have posted evidence there are 29 dolts on 911. No Pulitzer Prizes are given for failure and stupidity.

You posted proof that there are failed ideas from 0.0001 percent of the world's engineers.
 
Last edited:
How often is the sky falling in your world of moronic ideas on 911?

You have posted evidence there are 29 dolts on 911. No Pulitzer Prizes are given for failure and stupidity.

Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:dc_biggrin: :dc_tongue: :dc_shocked: :dc_sorry: :dc_chief: :dc_angry: :dc_furious:
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.
...
I am an engineer and you have 0.0001 percent failed moronic tripe from a few nut case fringe engineers on your side. So I out vote you by millions. Not only are you ideas pure claptrap, but they are old failed refuted lies. Your thermite is a lie made up four years after 911 by a fired cold fusion physicist who has nut case ideas on 911. The more dancing dolts you post the more your ideas accelerate down the pit of ignorance.
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:dc_biggrin: :dc_tongue: :dc_shocked: :dc_sorry: :dc_chief: :dc_angry: :dc_furious:

seeing only 29 out of the hundreds of thousands out there are they only ones who seem tho think that

i'd say this doesnt say much
29000 id say you had a case

do those guys build Ihops too?
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:Dancing_laugh::Dancing_cool:



None of Gage's frauds will debate real engineers. Pegelow works on oil rigs; he believes the towers were nuked. Rice is in his eighties and has read absolutely nothing about the collapses. Not one of these fools can make a coherent case for their idiocy.
 
The NIST report was written before the thermite was discovered. It is an outmoded report.

You need to cite a report that is up to date with the latest scientific findings. Fail.


No thermite was discovered. You've been caught lying again.
 
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1. ...
Oops, you have Charles N. Pegelow, Civil Engineer; what did he do change light bulbs? You are down one structural engineer. 28. Prove Charles built high rise building like a 110 story building and you may have something if he were not so darn old, stupid and biased.

You are down to 28 dolts on 911 issues. Next

I have Robertson the chief structural engineer of the WTC and you have a bunch of zeros, Charlie here is not a structural engineer.
 
Last edited:
Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

:dc_biggrin: :dc_tongue: :dc_shocked: :dc_sorry: :dc_chief: :dc_angry: :dc_furious:
actually if finewine and beachnut both have engineering degrees that brings it to 29 to 2, and i suspect that gap will close quickly as more people reply
 
Jun 17, 2009
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11
— Gregg Roberts and Staff

Troll much?

Until any or all of these alleged engineers speak in public and try to convince other people with relevant expertise that they have a case, an announcement on the Internet counts for nothing.

7 years of announcements on the Internet has gotten the Truth Movement where is now, a shrinking group of people that can't accomplish anything in the real world.

The "Tea Bag" anti-tax protests and and the "Obama isn't a citizen"movements are running rings around the Truth Movement in terms of having any impact in the real world.
 
Last edited:
The NIST report was written before the thermite was discovered. It is an outmoded report.

You need to cite a report that is up to date with the latest scientific findings. Fail.

If the discovery of thermite is the determining factor, then the report is still valid.

Ain't any thermite in the rubble. It's freakin' PAINT. You got that?

Are you in the room?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom