North Korea cancels truce

quixotecoyote said:
If that was at all representative of general sentiment, you'd never be able to occupy the place. If it ends up being a military solution to the nuclear issue, they'll have to raze the place to the ground.
Click to expand...


True. But if Jenkins' book is any guide, you'll be happy to know he reports being able to erase about two decades worth of ideological indoctrination by handing each of his two daughters a $50 bill* and turning them loose at the base PX in Japan.

* Actually, he said it was his lawyer's idea, being too much of a tightwad to think of it himself.
 
Last edited:
shuize said:
True. But if Jenkins' book is any guide, you'll be happy to know he reports being able to erase about two decades worth of ideological indoctrination by handing each of his two daughters a $50 bill* and turning them loose at the base PX in Japan.

* Actually, he said it was his lawyer's idea, being too much of a tightwad to think of it himself.
Click to expand...


LIke Pj O Rouke's statement that dozens of years of Communist rule in Russia was wrecked by Levi,s, Rock and Roll, and VCRs.
 
I think it is a sign of how bad the situation is is that OBama in not sending envoys or making a huge deal about the two reporters who were sentecned as spys in a Kangeroo court right out of Stalin's Purge trials. Which is precisely the right way to handle it.

Tuesday CNN had some fool with a PHD on who blamed the US and South Korea for the crisis, talked about "liberal elements withing the Korean Government" and urged immediate reunification of Korea. A superb example of at times academia is the most totally removed place on earth from reality...except for maybe North Korea.
 
Architect said:
Ahha, the daft buggers are at it again:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/13/north-korea-nuclear-weapon-plutonium
Click to expand...


From the link:

There was no attempt to expand the sanctions to exports and imports of non-military goods. This is partly because China and Russia would have been opposed, but also because of fears a collapse of the North Korean economy would result in a flood of refugees into South Korea.
Click to expand...


That can't be right. They must mean China.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom