So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

OK, it's a done deal, Silverstein wasn't part of the decision making process. So what? Why are you babbling on about his quote for?

To prove a point.


You just showed an interview with Hayden where he repeatedly uses the word "pull" to refer to the firefighters.


Yes when evacuating them.

When talking to Silverstein the fire commander could have only meant the building because the firemen were ALREADY OUT OF THE BUILDING.
 
When talking to Silverstein the fire commander could have only meant the building becasue the firemen were ALREADY OUT OF THE BUILDING.

Do you know the entire content of the conversation? He could just as easily have told Silverstein about his decision to pull everyone out and let the building collapse, and that's what Silverstein repeated in the interview.

And for the tenth time, you are avoiding the question about motive.
 

WE ALL NEED TO DO THAT.

This thread was not about firefighting. It was about how Silverstein lost money on this terrorist attack, and how that would have been really STUPID if he were like inside the inside jobby-job.

However, if people choose NOT to ignore the Trolling at this time, alert on the off-topic nature of the off-topic posts and get the thread split.

Thanks!
 
In this case pull it means the building becasue as per the fire chiefs the firemen were already out of the building when the call was made to Silverstein.

THOSE ARE THE FACTS.

No. Those are not facts. Those are your own opinions that you faithfully cling to.

Please provide evidence that 'Pull it' means to bring a building down in demolition parlance.
 
Yes when evacuating them.

When talking to Silverstein the fire commander could have only meant the building because the firemen were ALREADY OUT OF THE BUILDING.
Now that I have finally stopped laughing at the stupidity of U1's statements, I can respond. You have ZERO evidence that the firemen were out of the building when the call was made. It could have been made right after the evacuation was ordered. You have no timeline other than the one you made up. There is no common sense in anything you have posted. Just a bunch of immature speculation as to the time without a shred of evidence to back it. You present facts that completely contradict what you are saying. 3:30 in the afternoon is not early in the day when compared with the collapse time. I challenged you with providing the phone records to back what you are saying and all you come back with is your phony "common sense."
 
NO i did not. Please read post.

I have proven that fire chiefs can bring down buildings in an emergency.


You were caught lying. You proved, as usual, only that you have no idea of what you're talking about. It is impossible to "bring down" a massive skyscraper without weeks of preparation. Nobody "brought down" WTC 7.

Please stop.
 
1 more time.

READ CHIEF HAYDENS STATEMENTS, you will find the answer for yourself.

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html


Are you totally mad or are you simply unable to read? It is not possible to read a clear statement and garble its meaning beyond recognition unless something is seriously wrong somewhere.

Here are Hayden's words from the interview YOU have linked to:


Firehouse: Chief Nigro said they made a collapse zone and wanted everybody away from number 7� did you have to get all of those people out?
Hayden: Yeah, we had to pull everybody back. It was very difficult. We had to be very forceful in getting the guys out. They didn�t want to come out. There were guys going into areas that I wasn�t even really comfortable with, because of the possibility of secondary collapses. We didn�t know how stable any of this area was. We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon. We said, this building is going to come down, get back. It came down about 5 o�clock or so, but we had everybody backed away by then. At that point in time, it seemed like a somewhat smaller event, but under any normal circumstances, that�s a major event, a 47-story building collapsing. It seemed like a firecracker after the other ones came down, but I mean that�s a big building, and when it came down, it was quite an event. But having gone through the other two, it didn�t seem so bad. But that�s what we were concerned about. We had said to the guys, we lost as many as 300 guys. We didn�t want to lose any more people that day. And when those numbers start to set in among everybody� My feeling early on was we weren�t going to find any survivors. You either made it out or you didn�t make it out. It was a cataclysmic event.
 
So please tell me did he pull the men out before of after the fire commander ordered him too after talking to Silverstien? Oh thats right Chief Nigro told him to pull them BEFORE the call.



Because common sense shows that if the firemen were out of the building before the call then he could have only been talking about the building.

But, YOU DON'T KNOW WHEN, OR IF, THE CALL TO SILVERSTEIN WAS MADE!

How in the name of reason and sanity can you keep comparing the time of the evacuation to the time of the call when you know ONLY ONE OF THEM???
 
The facts speak for themselves, unless your trying to say the fire chiefs are lying.


Yes, the facts do speak for themselves. NOBODY connected with the FDNY ever said anything about bringing down WTC 7.

How can you continue this insanity?
 
facts? what facts?

You havent posted any evidence that pulling a 40+ story building has, or even CAN be done in that amount of time.

One would think an NSA analyst would at least post his evidence. We all know better.



But "pulling" has nothing to do with explosives? Why, O why, do you persist in encouraging his dishonest use of the term?
 
The facts that fire chiefs state that the firemen were out of the building before the phone call.


Chief Nigro pulled the firemen before talking to anyone that means before talking to the fire commader who was talking to Silverstein.


How many posts of mine address this point? Are you mad? Can you read?

You DON'T KNOW WHEN, OR IF, THE CALL TO SILVERSTEIN WAS MADE!

Nigro gave the order to pull at approximately 2 PM. According to Hayden, the operation was finished by 3:30. You DON'T KNOW if someone called Silverstein between 2 and 3:30.
 
In this case pull it means the building becasue as per the fire chiefs the firemen were already out of the building when the call was made to Silverstein.

THOSE ARE THE FACTS.


The fact that your illness prevents you from processing is that "pulling" relates to attaching cables. The term has nothing to do with explosives. It is IMPOSSIBLE to "pull" a 47-story building. Firefighters talk about "pulling" men from a dangerous environment.

NOBODY talked about "pulling" a skyscraper. It is IMPOSSIBLE.
 
Chief Hayden gives the time when the firmen wre pulled back.. Its hours before the buidling was brought down.


Don't ask me ask the people that were there.




The building was not "brought down." NOBODY in the FDNY ever said anything about "bringing down" the building. IT COLLAPSED!!!! Hayden says CLEARLY that the men were pulled by 3:30 PM. The building COLLAPSED at 5 PM.

Stop the insanity!
 

Back
Top Bottom