New research paper published by Dr. Fetzer

Which is the best article?

  • Dr. Fetzer's research paper

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • Dick Eastman's article

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rolf Lindgren's article within an article

    Votes: 3 75.0%
  • all three make good points

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
Oh lord. James "Star Wars energy beam" Fetzer has no business in a intellectual debate. How a professor who taught critical thinking can be so intellectual bankrupt is beyond me.
 
Proving the true motivation of the twoofer movement. It's not about facts, it's about getting enough opinions to create a truth.
 
where is the "who gives a ****" option in the poll choices.

I demand a rewording to include this option!!!

TAM;)
 
This thread is a good place for a cat picture. I miss those days.

I know! It's been so long I forgot my photobucket account name with all my cat photos. Rats....I mean cats!
 
Last edited:
The paper was written by a moron; is Fetzer a moron? Who is dumb enough to produce or believe these no plane lies and fantasies? You have to lack knowledge on a broad range of subjects to find merit in this paper of moronic lies.
 
Sorry, but I can't resist voting in meaningless polls, and they don't get much more meaningless than this one.

Given the absence of an option "All three are total [rule 10]", I've entered a vote for Lindgren, as he doesn't actually draw any conclusions in this article other than that Fetzer is a waste of air. However, this should be taken to reflect nothing more than the fact that this particular pile of [rule 10] has a slightly less noxious odour than the other two.

Dave
 

Back
Top Bottom