• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Airplanes can bury themselves completely in the ground.

Juniversal said:
Can't post links yet but I always found these pictures compelling.

911review . com/errors/pentagon/imgs/tupolev_154m_jul401.jpg

911review . com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html
Click to expand...
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/tupolev_154m_jul401.jpg
The tail section remains because the crash was slow speed.

BTW, you posted evidence that flight 93 crash does look right from one another 911 delusion master.

Irony is 911 woo sites post the best proof 19 terrorists took 4 planes and failed to hit 4 buildings. While poor bill smith sees the web sites of woo as evidence for her delusions, you post photos showing why flight 93 impact crash scene is what you get when you hit the earth at 600 mph.
 
Last edited:
And from that same page on the 911review site that juniversal posted links to

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html


  • The photographs in the talk are not necessarily a representative sample of jetliner crashes.
  • Even in those photographs, it is remarkable that so few large pieces survive other than the few intact pieces.
  • The size of debris from a jetliner crash is highly dependent on the nature of the crash. Whereas a plane that skids and bounces on the ground will likely survive in one or more large pieces, one that flies directly into the ground will not.
Click to expand...
 
beachnut said:
911review . com/errors/pentagon/crashdebris.html

911review . com/errors/pentagon/imgs/tupolev_154m_jul401.jpg[/URL]
The tail section remains because the crash was slow speed.

BTW, you posted evidence that flight 93 crash does look right from one another 911 delusion master.

Irony is 911 woo sites post the best proof 19 terrorists took 4 planes and failed to hit 4 buildings. While poor bill smith sees the web sites of woo as evidence for her delusions, you post photos showing why flight 93 impact crash scene is what you get when you hit the earth at 600 mph.
Click to expand...
Don't get me wrong. I am no fan of 9-11 review NOR am I a truther lol. I simply found these images on google and felt they actually added credance to the official story. Not the other way around.
 
BenBurch said:
You made yourself a fool, a liar, and BLIND, and that exposes Beachnut who would not play your demented game????

OK, come on. Fess up. You aren't REALLY a Truther, are you? This is all some sort of performance art, isn't it? This is gonna be a rather funny little comedy book when you are done, right?
Click to expand...



Bingo. It's impossible to be so dense. Think Don Novello/Lazlo Toth.
 
Juniversal said:
Don't get me wrong. I am no fan of 9-11 review NOR am I a truther lol. I simply found these images on google and felt they actually added credance to the official story. Not the other way around.
Click to expand...
I agree; I find the truther sites a great source of material that destroys their delusions. Just as you have found and posted.

Welcome to the forum.
 
Definitely. I surfed around for a few days and was pleasently suprised by the abundance of critical thinkers and rationalist. I feel right at home lol.
 
(Sung to the main theme of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony)

Fail Fail Fail FAIL!
Fail Fail Fail FAIL!

Yes, the incompetent mewling displayed by BS and RI is but a pale imitation of the virtuoso performances of such leaders as Gage, Fetzer, Ryan, etc.. in that grand composition of Epic Failure known as 9/11 Truth.

Never before in my lifetime have I seen such a combination of Terrorist apologia, outright falsehood, half-witted analysis and delusion masquerading as 'TRUTH'. The legions of truther trolls are like the Gollums of critical thinking; they admire it, but also despise it and want to destroy it. Their ceaseless attempts to pervert the truth and to excuse the actual terrorists is unforgiveable - it is an abomination to be attacked wherever it appears.

If the nonsense these idiots are spouting is 'TRUTH' then maybe we should revise the definition of the word altogether.



 
Last edited:
tfk said:
Gee, red,

Ever occur to you that they might have dropped the bucket into the photo to provide something of known dimensions for scale?

tom
Click to expand...

No, I did not consider that, but I can see that as a possibility.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom