• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Airplanes can bury themselves completely in the ground.

bill smith said:
Have the courage of your convictions and answer the question first.
Click to expand...
All the videos of flight 93 have the wing marks in the ground. You have moronic delusions, lies and hearsay.

That answers the question; if you don't understand that is the answer it standard for you and is indicative of your shallow research and failed ideas on 911.

bill smith has lies and delusions; no evidence

why are the wing impact points exactly the width of a 757? gee-whiz bill smith, why?

how heavy are the wings? how much fuel is in each wing? how could a jet impact at 600 mph and the wings not make a ground impression?
 
Last edited:
beachnut said:
All the videos of flight 93 have the wing marks in the ground. You have moronic delusions, lies and hearsay.

That answers the question; if you don't understand that is the answer it standard for you and is indicative of your shallow research and failed ideas on 911.
Click to expand...

For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Below is the simple question I asked Beachnut. He is being very evasive as you can see. Ask yourself why. Why will he not answer directly if he believes what he says ?

'' First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.''
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Below is the simple question I asked Beachnut. He is being very evasive as yu can see. Ask yourself why. Why will he not answer directly if he believes what he says ?

'' First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.''
Click to expand...

Can you show us these videos, Bill ? I know you've been asked before but I thought maybe coming from somebdoy else it may encourage you to do so.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Below is the simple question I asked Beachnut. He is being very evasive as yu can see. Ask yourself why. Why will he not answer directly if he believes what he says ?

'' First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.''
Click to expand...


Show the live video Bill. You know you want too.

We know it wont be 'live' or show what you says you think it shows so just humor us Bill.
 
bill smith said:
For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Below is the simple question I asked Beachnut. He is being very evasive as yu can see. Ask yourself why. Why will he not answer directly if he believes what he says ?

'' First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.''
Click to expand...
For all who are watching the bill smith person post delusions...

Flight 93 impacted in PA and left an impact crater with wing impacts clearly the exact length of a 757-200. The wings carry fuel. The fuel helps destroy the wing at impact and helps make an impression in the soil; a 600 mph impact of a 757-200 looks like the impact crater in PA because it is flight 93; proved by RADAR and FDR to be 93.

bill simith posts delusions from 911 truthers, she has problems with facts
 
Last edited:
Bill, do you expect somebody to comment on something they have not seen?

Show us the videos, please.
 
First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.
Click to expand...

This is like asking a Road Traffic Officer "What if the CCTV of an accident showed no damage to either car until shortly before you turned up"

What sort of answer do you expect?

Show the video and give everyone a chance to see what it is you want people to comment on.

Be the bigger man and just show the video....
 
uh - o
whats that sound?

faildozer.jpg
 
PB2007 said:
This is like asking a Road Traffic Officer "What if the CCTV of an accident showed no damage to either car until shortly before you turned up"

What sort of answer do you expect?

Show the video and give everyone a chance to see what it is you want people to comment on.

Be the bigger man and just show the video....
Click to expand...

He/she has no 'live' video. He/she has nothing. Never will. He/she is a complete failure. Bill Smith fails at failure.
 
bill smith said:
For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Below is the simple question I asked Beachnut. He is being very evasive as you can see. Ask yourself why. Why will he not answer directly if he believes what he says ?

'' First tell us as an experienced aircraft accident investigator what it means if live video taken shortly after the crash clearly shows NO wing marks from the impact of flight 93.''
Click to expand...

For concerned citizens who might be reading this page:

Bill Smith has been shown, several times, what the evidene is that the plane crashed into the ground. He asked. We show. He continues to ignore or dismiss any evidence as he can only concieve of an 'inside job' perpetuated by the government. He has provided no evidence as to where he believes (faithfully) where the plane ended up. He is a truther terrorist, determined to spread fear and uncertainty.

We have asked BS many questions. Why has he avoided them? Why does he refuse to look at the evidence presented? He is being evasive, as you can see.
 
maybe the acronym bills initials suggests should be a clue to how some should view his posts
lol

ETA: some all
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom