The Heiwa Challenge

[Jackanory]

Just got following from ASCE

Ref.: Ms. No. EMENG-296
What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York
Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

Dear Mr Björkman,

Your Discussion, listed above, has been accepted for publication in ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

...

You will be notified of a publication date once your paper has been schedule for an issue.

Thank you for submitting your work to ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Parresol
Editorial Coordinator


---

So let's continue the discussion there! This thread is just about The Heiwa Challenge! Pls submit you structures!

Can you clarify what the 'discussion' is?

The Heiwa Challenge has now shifted Heiwa. The challege is to actually see if it gets published and too see how much laughter comes from it. Putting your nonsense into a larger arena can only be a good thing.

 

[dafydd]

No explosives are intelligence is permitted in The Heiwa Challenge. Only gravity.

There,fixed.

 

[dafydd]

Heiwa,I left school at 16 with no qualifications.I regret that now.I have always been interested in science and I read as much as I can about the subject.I have plenty of time on my hands and I have been following this closely.Using the posts and links provided by those here who know what they are talking about,even I can see where you are going wrong.I couldn't explain it to you myself,but I can see it.If an ignoramus like me can see it,why can't you? I can only conclude that you have the mother of all bees in your bonnet which blinds you to the truth.

 

[tfk]

So let's continue the discussion there! This thread is just about The Heiwa Challenge! Pls submit you structures!

Sorry Anders,

There is no discussion about "The Heiwa Challenge".

That's not right.

There has been a lively discussion about the challenge. You are just not a part of it. Because you have chosen to not participate.

The rest of us have been having a great time discussing the challenge in your absence. There is a large contingent that finds no merits, and with nobody to defend it...

So, I regret am pleased to inform you, that your theory has gone down in flames. Crashed & burned.

You will be further distressed to note that, when your theory augered in, full throttle, no sign of any attempt to recover, (aka, "uncontrolled flight into terrain"), the various pieces of your theory did NOT remain connected to each other. They ended up scattered all over the map.

The FAA has announced that they do NOT consider the mid-air breakup of your theory to be proof of "explosive demolition". Which, ironically, may have contributed to the crash. As that piece detached from the rest of the theory on its own yesterday.

No memorial services are planned...

tk

 

[bill smith]

Just got following from ASCE

Ref.: Ms. No. EMENG-296
What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York
Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

Dear Mr Björkman,

Your Discussion, listed above, has been accepted for publication in ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

...

You will be notified of a publication date once your paper has been schedule for an issue.

Thank you for submitting your work to ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Parresol
Editorial Coordinator


---

So let's continue the discussion there! This thread is just about The Heiwa Challenge! Pls submit you structures!

What is the ASCE again Heiwa ? Is it
The American Society of Civil Engineers ?

And they essentially accept Your version of 9/11 ?

Many congratulations.

 

[bill smith]

Sorry Anders,

There is no discussion about "The Heiwa Challenge".

That's not right.

There has been a lively discussion about the challenge. You are just not a part of it. Because you have chosen to not participate.

The rest of us have been having a great time discussing the challenge in your absence. There is a large contingent that finds no merits, and with nobody to defend it...

So, I regret am pleased to inform you, that your theory has gone down in flames. Crashed & burned.

You will be further distressed to note that, when your theory augered in, full throttle, no sign of any attempt to recover, (aka, "uncontrolled flight into terrain"), the various pieces of your theory did NOT remain connected to each other. They ended up scattered all over the map.

The FAA has announced that they do NOT consider the mid-air breakup of your theory to be proof of "explosive demolition". Which, ironically, may have contributed to the crash. As that piece detached from the rest of the theory on its own yesterday.

No memorial services are planned...

tk

Stick to your usual verbiage t. You do not have the wit for this type of writing.

 

[FineWine]

What is the ASCE again Heiwa ? Is it
The American Society of Civil Engineers ?

And they essentially accept Your version of 9/11 ?

Many congratulations.

No, they most emphatically do not. I know something you don't. This should be fun.

We get the idea that you are as obtuse as you are dishonest, but to leap from ASCE's willingness to publish Heiwa's comments on Bazant to a conclusion that real engineers can be snowed by an utter crackpot is embarrassingly stupid even for you.

 

[Audible Click]

I don't think bill smith understands peer review and it's consequences.

 

[stateofgrace]

What is the ASCE again Heiwa ? Is it
The American Society of Civil Engineers ?

And they essentially accept Your version of 9/11 ?

Many congratulations.

Bill, you do realise that Hiewa did not write or contribute to "What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York", right?

 

[FineWine]

I don't think bill smith understands peer review and it's consequences.

Bill Smith doesn't understand much of anything. He will understand what happened to his lunatic guru when Bazant gets through with him, however.

 

[bill smith]

No, they most emphatically do not. I know something you don't. This should be fun.

We get the idea that you are as obtuse as you are dishonest, but to leap from ASCE's willingness to publish Heiwa's comments on Bazant to a conclusion that real engineers can be snowed by an utter crackpot is embarrassingly stupid even for you.

I'll keep it simple for you

No Bazant = No official explanation for the collapses= 9/11 was an inside job.

 

[FineWine]

I'll keep it simple for you

No Bazant = No official explanation for the collapses= 9/11 was an inside job.

Yes, you are extremely simple. Bazant's is not the "official" explanation of the collapses. Nobody thinks it is. All serious researchers have reached similiar, but not identical, conclusions. Your faith-based inside job idiocy is dead. After eight years, you frauds have produced nothing to support your lies.

You keep running away when I ask you why your tiny, insane movement got everything wrong. Why did nothing turn out the way you losers prayed it would?

 

[bill smith]

Bill Smith doesn't understand much of anything. He will understand what happened to his lunatic guru when Bazant gets through with him, however.

Forget Bazant- the ASCE obviously has.

....unless of course in your broad mind they have now joined the long list of crazy conspiracy theorists ?

 

[bill smith]

Yes, you are extremely simple. Bazant's is not the "official" explanation of the collapses. Nobody thinks it is. All serious researchers have reached similiar, but not identical, conclusions. Your faith-based inside job idiocy is dead. After eight years, you frauds have produced nothing to support your lies.

You keep running away when I ask you why your tiny, insane movement got everything wrong. Why did nothing turn out the way you losers prayed it would?

You ar quite wrong. Bazant was the only game in town. No Bazant- no nothing.

 

[FineWine]

Forget Bazant- the ASCE obviously has.

....unless of course in your broad mind they have now joined the long list of crazy conspiracy theorists ?

Really? You mean you haven't been caught lying again? It's "obvious" that ASCE has "forgotten" about a superstar of the engineering community? Wow.

Gee, what if Bazant were to respond to Heiwa's nonsense? That would be something, wouldn't it?

 

[stateofgrace]

Forget Bazant- the ASCE obviously has.

....unless of course in your broad mind they have now joined the long list of crazy conspiracy theorists ?

Have they Bill ?

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf

Doesn't look that way to me. The above is the paper your hero did not write and did not contribute to, yet in his post we have this

Ref.: Ms. No. EMENG-296
What Did and Did not Cause Collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York
Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

Why do you think that is Bill ? You are capable of reading and thinking, right?

 

[FineWine]

You ar quite wrong. Bazant was the only game in town. No Bazant- no nothing.

Yeah, NIST's ten thousand pages, the Purdue simulations, the Berkeley simulations--all just figments of our imaginations.

Yeah, Bazant's early paper is the only game in town. You're giving Ultima1 a good run for his money.


Wow. Just--wow!

 

[bill smith]

Really? You mean you haven't been caught lying again? It's "obvious" that ASCE has "forgotten" about a superstar of the engineering community? Wow.

Gee, what if Bazant were to respond to Heiwa's nonsense? That would be something, wouldn't it?

I think it would be a miracle if he did. But what if he doesn't now that you have brought it up ? lol

 

[FineWine]

Have they Bill ?

http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/00%20WTC%20Collapse%20-%20What%20Did%20&%20Did%20Not%20Cause%20It.pdf

Doesn't look that way to me. The above is the paper your hero did not write and did not contribute to, yet in his post we have this



Why do you think that is Bill ? You are capable of reading and thinking, right?

Anyone who attributes the authorship of a paper written by real scientists to his crackpot guru displays an extraordinary combination of stupidity and dishonesty.

 

[bill smith]

Yeah, NIST's ten thousand pages, the Purdue simulations, the Berkeley simulations--all just figments of our imaginations.

Yeah, Bazant's early paper is the only game in town. You're giving Ultima1 a good run for his money.


Wow. Just--wow!

NIST has no analysis for the collapse sequence at all. Purdue are shills as I have shown you before and can show you again. What are the Berkeley simulations ? Nope- you guys are done.