"Abortion Doctor" Murdered

Passionate words on the internet = killing people.

Gotcha. :boggled:

I've never equated the extremes with killing people. In fact - I'd say most people in the extremes on either side will never kill someone. But they are dragging us into their bitch-slapping sessions.
 
I've never equated the extremes with killing people. In fact - I'd say most people in the extremes on either side will never kill someone.

However, the point of this thread is that with one extreme, you do have people killing. You do have people bombing. You do have people engaging in acts of terror. You do not have this on the other side of the issue at all.
 
.. is that with one extreme, you do have people killing. You do have people bombing. You do have people engaging in acts of terror. You do not have this on the other side of the issue at all.


The Weather Underground??:boxedin:
 
However, the point of this thread is that with one extreme, you do have people killing. You do have people bombing. You do have people engaging in acts of terror. You do not have this on the other side of the issue at all.

And right away in this thread you have people immediately blaming entire segments of the population for this psycho's actions.
 
And right away in this thread you have people immediately blaming entire segments of the population for this psycho's actions.

"It is really tragic how right wingers are often associated with other right wingers who say the exact things they do but go shoot people. This is so unfair." - El Cid
 
You're embarrassing yourself.

Me? So far I've gone round and round with people refusing to clarify the words they use and round and round with people telling me to stick to the topic. And then people like you ready to blame entire segments of the population because of one guys actions. And all I wonder is why it's a Federal Issue? So far people seem to say because it's equivalent to racism / slavery and that abortion is some sort of right. So - thanks for the good input - sorry if I missed someones insight between these other posts.
 
Nope. Sorry - you're wrong. He never used the phrase "corresponding level of violence". He just said violence - so me asking him to clarify what he actually meant is highly appropriate - because he very well may have meant "corresponding level of violence " or he may have meant "grabbing someone in a headlock and slamming them to the ground."

So MattusMaximus - what's your definition of violence?
I can't speak for MM, but for me your just avoiding the issue. Here's a suggestion. YOU define what violence is in the context of this thread then give us an example or two of it.

IOW, stop weasling and start engaging.
 
And right away in this thread you have people immediately blaming entire segments of the population for this psycho's actions.

I addressed that earlier. But your attempt at deflection doesn't change the fact that the murders, terrorism, etc. are all coming from one side of the abortion debate.
 
Unfortunately, MattusMaximus, there has been some, but I'm too tired to search for better sources than those that come up quickly in google. I don't trust pro-life sites enough to use them as a source...sorry, been a long day. But it has happened. Mostly kicking and hitting, I think, but I seem to recall one knife brandishing. Again, extremists, as with the pro-life violence.

If true, that is clearly inappropriate and I hope that individual got their just desserts through our legal system. However, it doesn't equate to what I keep asking for... evidence of "pro-choicers" bombing & shooting "pro-life" advocates in an effort to intimidate them. I don't see how I can be any more clear on this particular point, and anyone who continues to ask for "clarification" is obviously acting the fool in an effort to avoid facing facts and answering the damn question.
 
Don't be an idiot.

Thanks for being so kind and willing to discuss. I love the tolerance and openness here.

Of course I mean the same kind in regards to abortion extremists as outlined all through this thread and at this link:

http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_national/clinic_violence/

You know, the good ol' standbys of domestic terrorism... bombing and shooting in an effort to intimidate.

And thanks for clarifying. I won't post what I found then. That's all. Was it so hard to clarify? wow.

What the hell's with the hostility here? You'd think I was for making abortion illegal or something.:boggled:

Wow - just wow.
 
Well, aside from the fact that this was several decades ago, they weren't involved in abortion rights one way or the other. So...no.

I never said they were very good at it but a pathetic attempt could be made to insinuate that they were attempting to be verrrrrrryyyyyyy late term abortionists.:cool:
 
I addressed that earlier. But your attempt at deflection doesn't change the fact that the murders, terrorism, etc. are all coming from one side of the abortion debate.

Nobody is dying on the other side? Hmmm.
 
I can't speak for MM, but for me your just avoiding the issue. Here's a suggestion. YOU define what violence is in the context of this thread then give us an example or two of it.

IOW, stop weasling and start engaging.

He wanted someone to post something. I found something - but wasn't sure if it qualified for his definition. I'm still not sure if it did, but he's being rather abrupt and others here seem awfully touchy. Oh well. I'm glad to see such willingness to discuss things here.

I'm the one weasling and not engaging? Puh.... Lease.
 

Back
Top Bottom