How disrespectful can truthers be?

[SteveAustin]

Highly unlikely, if only because it is far too easy to insult truthers by using direct quotes (say, from this very thread, for example...) rather than going to the trouble of defacing a memorial.

Do you have any proof it was a "truther"? Or just your assumptions?

 

[SteveAustin]

Do you have any proof that it was "truthers" that vandalized the memorial?

Paint chips from this vandalism were analyzed and no traces of thermite were found.

Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusion = This Was Not A False Flag Vandalism

Not to mention posting the personal info of the family. Remember Tweeter's comment on this forum: He said they deserved it.

Nice!

TAM

Given the tone in many of your posts on this site, throughout your stay, I would not be pointing fingers with respect to condescension or pettiness.

I was not covering for anyone. I noted your transparent attempt to try and turn around on people here, what you perceive to be a persecution of truthers and their claims, in terms of providing evidence etc...

I am sure the comments on this particular topic were not posted for the purposes of having an intellectual debate on the matter, which is why I found it rather petty and juvenile for you to try and say,

"look, you guys are doing exactly what you accuse the truthers of...making a claim with no evidence to back it up".

TAM

Funny, that was the Truthers reaction to the now infamous Wheelchair Incident.
That, and accuse the girl in the wheelchair and her parents of being part of a "disinfo" campaign.

After seeing the activities of We Are Change, the antics of Alex Jones and Other Truther Spokesman and what we see on the interenet everyday for the NWO to conduct a "disinfo" campaign against Truthers is idiotic. The Truthers do a fine job of totally discrediting their stupid movement themselves.

WOW all those off-topic posts, all dodges and still no one has provided any proof, let alone evidence that it was a "truther" that vandalised the memorial.

So your standards of requiring proof that you all constantly demand from "truthers" does not apply to yourselves it seems!!

 

[johnny karate]

So then you have proof that it was a truther? Or are you doing the same thing as all the other debunkers on this thread and "assuming" it was a truther because you want to bash truthers?

Nope. I assume it was a Truther because it probably was a Truther.

Of course not, but your reply is trying to insinuate that that is what I believe is classic debunking 101 (check the list of "38 ways to win an argument" , heck now that I look at your entire post I realize that your entire post fits into one category or anther of those 38 ways)

Every time you derail a thread to mention your magic list, you're engaging in tactic number 29 from that very list: If you find that you are being beaten, you can create a diversion--that is, you can suddenly begin to talk of something else, as though it had a bearing on the matter in dispute. An irony which I'm sure is completely lost on you.

This is completely irrelevant rambling and is intended to confuse you more. Of course the first place the cops would look is with people who enjoy ice cream, are you implying that the most likely suspects are always the guilty party? Seems that is what you are trying to imply here, and any cop or lawyer or judge would laugh in your face if you told them that.

So why say they would start their investigation with "people who enjoy ice cream" (meaning "truthers" if we are going to go back on topic) and not then say that once they have investigated them they would then move on to others who have motive to frame "truthers", because if you are completely impartial you will realize that a "debunker" trying to frame a truther has every bit as much motive to vandalize a memorial as a "truther" might have.

Ask a cop how often the most likely suspect ends up being the guilty party, and how often the most likely suspect ends up being the victim of a "false flag operation". Once he/she is done laughing at you, I think you'll find his/her answer to be disappointingly contradictory to your world-view.

I never definitively claimed a Truther committed this act of vandalism, nor are we ever likely to definitely know it was a Truther. Perhaps someday we will know the truth behind Tagger-gate, but until then I'm content to side with common sense and the laws of probability and believe it was a Truther.

If you want to believe otherwise, have at it. But don't pretend you have anything more than your own personal incredulity to support your arguments.

 

[johnny karate]

Do you have any proof it was a "truther"? Or just your assumptions?

Do you have any proof that anyone ever framed a Truther for vandalism?

 

[tsig]

Do you have any proof that it was "truthers" that vandalized the memorial?

Paint chips from this vandalism were analyzed and no traces of thermite were found.

Draw your own conclusions.

My conclusion = This Was Not A False Flag Vandalism

Welcome to JREF.

 

[abenja1]

WOW all those off-topic posts, all dodges and still no one has provided any proof, let alone evidence that it was a "truther" that vandalised the memorial.

So your standards of requiring proof that you all constantly demand from "truthers" does not apply to yourselves it seems!!

If there was evidence you would say it was forged by the gov't or something. I can't think of any instance where someone posed as a truther to make truthers look bad. And the same vice versa.

 

[T.A.M.]

WOW all those off-topic posts, all dodges and still no one has provided any proof, let alone evidence that it was a "truther" that vandalised the memorial.

So your standards of requiring proof that you all constantly demand from "truthers" does not apply to yourselves it seems!!

I just assumed that the whole issue was one of speculation any way. I doubt anyone really cares if there is proof, or not, or if a truther really did this or not. My only comment was concerning your transparent attempt to turn this issue into one of "evidence" and "proof" and throwing it back in debunkers faces, when you have to know that this more of a light, fluff topic rather than one warranting any real investigation etc...

but carry on, if it makes you happy.

TAM

 

[Justin39640]

WOW all those off-topic posts, all dodges and still no one has provided any proof, let alone evidence that it was a "truther" that vandalised the memorial.

So your standards of requiring proof that you all constantly demand from "truthers" does not apply to yourselves it seems!!

My apologies mods before hand

steve
you want to know why I know that was a truther
one - that sign in on the Long Island Expressway ONE OF THE BUSIEST AND HEAVILY PATROLLED AREAS IN THE COUNTRY
NO ONE MAKING A "FALSE FLAG PROTEST" (as ridiculous as that sounds) WOULD DO IT THERE its too easy to get caught

2 - THIS IS (rule10)ING NEW YORK, (rule10)hole
MY NEIGHBORS ARE (rule10)ING DEAD
EVERY ONE LOST SOMEONE THAT DAY AROUND HERE
NOOOOOOOOOOOO ONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THAT ISNTTTTTTTTTT A TRUTHERRRRRRRRRRRRRR WOULD DO THAT HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE,
(rule10)hole
all those posts you added to this thread and not an ounce of remorse for a vandalized memorial REGARDLESS OF WHO DID IT

PULL YOU HEAD OUT OF YOUR SELF IMPORTANT (rule10)
moron

again mods im sorry

 

[TheDaver]

Further off-topic dodge noted.

Again I ask, do you have any proof that the vandalism was done by "truthers"?

The graffiti says INSIDE JOB. By the same standards of proof you twinks apply to the WTC collapses, it’s undeniable.

So your standards of requiring proof that you all constantly demand from "truthers" does not apply to yourselves it seems!!

You’re not in any position to make such a complaint.

 

[Audible Click]

My apologies mods before hand

steve
you want to know why I know that was a truther
one - that sign in on the Long Island Expressway ONE OF THE BUSIEST AND HEAVILY PATROLLED AREAS IN THE COUNTRY
NO ONE MAKING A "FALSE FLAG PROTEST" (as ridiculous as that sounds) WOULD DO IT THERE its too easy to get caught

2 - THIS IS FCKIN NEW YORK AHOLE
MY NEIGHBORS ARE FCKING DEAD
EVERY ONE LOST SOMEONE THAT DAY AROUND HERE
NOOOOOOOOOOOO ONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE THAT ISNTTTTTTTTTT A TRUTHERRRRRRRRRRRRRR WOULD DO THAT HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE,
AHOLE
all those posts you added to this thread and not an ounce of remorse for a vandalized memorial REGARDLESS OF WHO DID IT

PULL YOU HEAD OUT OF YOUR SELF IMPORTANT ASS
moron


again mods im sorry

Well said but please don't let this horse's hind end get you yellow carded. He has no respect because he doesn't care about anything but trolling.

 

[dudalb]

"9/11 Was A Inside Job" gets spraypainted on other's people property and Austin is angry because Truthers are the prime suspects?
Beam me up, Scotty......

 

[Justin39640]

Well said but please don't let this horses hind end get you yellow carded. He has no respect because he doesn't care about anything but trolling.

Honestly after comin home from 10 hours at work and i read all that this guy goin back and froth like its a black box thread
i had to let it out couldnt help it

ill edit it

 

[abenja1]

It's quite amazing that SteveAustin won't condemn the act. I think he knows it was a truther so that's why he doesn't want to.

 

[Thom_]

It's pretty sick really.

Even if you really are stupid enough to believe that 9/11 was an 'inside job', surely you can not be stupid enough to think it's a good idea to ruin a memorial for the people who died on that day. Are conspiracy theories worth more than life?

 

[dudalb]

It's pretty sick really.

Even if you really are stupid enough to believe that 9/11 was an 'inside job', surely you can not be stupid enough to think it's a good idea to ruin a memorial for the people who died on that day. Are conspiracy theories worth more than life?

And this is minor compared to some of the crap the truthers have done. The Wheelchair incident comes to mind.

 

[Justin39640]

It's pretty sick really.

Even if you really are stupid enough to believe that 9/11 was an 'inside job', surely you can not be stupid enough to think it's a good idea to ruin a memorial for the people who died on that day. Are conspiracy theories worth more than life?

nothing is more important than the "truth" to them
even if it means stomping all over the graves of all the people they claim they are working to vindicate

 

[NobbyNobbs]

Do you have any proof it was a "truther"? Or just your assumptions?

So if a black family in Georgia woke up one morning to find a burning cross on their lawn, as sheriff of the town would you

a) go looking for members of the KKK, or
b) devote your manpower to the possibility that someone in the black community is trying to give white supremacists a bad name?


This question is not entirely tongue-in-cheek. I'd really like to know what you'd do.

 

[johnny karate]

It's quite amazing that SteveAustin won't condemn the act. I think he knows it was a truther so that's why he doesn't want to.

My theory is that SteveAustin defaced the memorial himself in an attempt to discredit debunkers by making it appear it was committed by a debunker trying to discredit Truthers. It's called Double Secret False Flag Vandalism, and is quite a common tactic among anti-debunker Truthers.

 

[T.A.M.]

Note:

When I referred to this topic as "light" and "fluff" I meant in terms of investigation and research etc...

Obviously the desecration of a memorial like this is not "fluff" or "light". Sorry if I offended anyone with the comment.

TAM

 

[Audible Click]

Note:

When I referred to this topic as "light" and "fluff" I meant in terms of investigation and research etc...

Obviously the desecration of a memorial like this is not "fluff" or "light". Sorry if I offended anyone with the comment.

TAM

I think any rational reader of your post knew what you meant. The CT'ers...well that's another story.