icerat
Philosopher
In the case of Amway, yes, this passive income is the result of the pyramid scheme in action.
NOTE: By your definition of "pyramid scheme", a definition that fits no known official or legal or dicitionary definition.
No, I've made numerous mention of the products being "decent" in general. I've also seen people make a strong case for the Amway version of some products being grotesquely over priced and over rated.
OK, so it's not that they're crap, you just think their bad value?
(note: there's been how many price comparisons so far on this site showing the products are priced as good or better than many competitors?? It's been at least a dozen different products now ....)
And that's what makes it a pyramid scheme, because people by products that are bad value?
Tell me, why do people keep ordering these products of bad value?
You'd think if they were bad value, many people would return them for a full refund wouldn't you?
But they don't
You'd think if they were bad value, nobody would keep ordering them, wouldn't you?
But many do
You'd think if they were bad value, that competitors in the market place would target that, and the brand would fail, wouldn't you?
Yet 50 years later, and some of the top brands in their categories
I could go on ... still, sooner or later a rational person has to examine their assumptions, don't you think?
Fact: Amway is a wholesaler. The IBO's operate like "stores". This is the only way Amway can continue to operate legally.
So Deloitte Touche, one of the biggest accounting firms in the world, who listed Amway as a "Global Power in Retailing", has been conned?
I linked to this before, but you apparently didn't read it, as it outlines what a "retail sale" is, and you don't appear to know what it is - Myth: It's a pyramid if most products are bought by ibos
And what the heck do you mean "this is the only way Amway can operate legally?"
I never made any statement to the contrary. Nor do I can one way or the other what or how many awards they may have won.
I've no idea how many they've won either. I did however provide you with a link to a page that lists over 100 awards and recognitions just from the last few years, most of which include supporting links for you to verify the information.
So you CAN know Amway has won many awards, you just CHOOSE not research it.
I never said they didn't. Nor do I care. I would like to know if "N21" offers the same "100% satisfaction" quartantee. If I'm not happy with ther "tools" and "seminars" will they refund me money?
Yup. Terms vary a little depending on the product. Got a full refund for a seminar ticket for a downline a few months ago actually. No problem.
Really though, back to Amway. Don't you think if a company offered bad value products, AND consumers could get ALL their money back, and not have to pay any shipping fees ... don't you think it unlikely that such a company would survive 50 years? Seriously?
50 years and continue to grow (75 years if you include Nutrilite history!), yet you think it's based on a flawed model that scams people.
Any other companies that you think are fraudulent that have been around so long?
I don't disagree. Nor do I care. This has nothing to do with why I think people should avoid Amway like the plague.
....
Don't care, not a factor.
Sorry? The only real basis you've given for Amway being fraudulent is that you think the products are effectively unmarketable and people only by them cause they've some how been conned.
And now you say you "don't care" about evidence of the quality of the product, and consumer demand for the product?
I guess that does describe your position. You "don't care" about the evidence, you know what you know and damned if a little thing like facts is going to get in the way!!
Don't care, not a factor. Buy all the Amway you like. Just don't ask me to sell it or think I will allow anyone I know to sell it either.
Wow ... and you say WE have undue influence ... yet YOU get to decide what people you know can do or not do!!

No, that would make it illegal. Although I will admit this is something I've learned from this thread, it has nothing to do with my change of mind.
Please read the "MYTH" link above. While in my opinion it would make it a dumb business, having everyone involved in the opportunity does NOT make it illegal. The FTC has explictly stated that.
No, we've established that a majority of members get suckered into Amway on the premise they will get a good deal on a great product.
No, we haven't established that at all. I'd actually consider it more than possible that many, perhaps even a majority, TRY the products at least partly because they're also interested in the business opportunity. Clearly if the products ARE crap then the model won't work. Many people, for whatever reason, decide not to pursue the business opportunity but decide they like the products and keep purchasing them. It's much like marketing any product with the idea of "loyalty cards" or "win a prize" or "get a discount with this company" etc etc. Marketing the business opportunity by definition also markets the products.
If the majority aren't attending, this makes the number attending stick out even further in my mind.
Ok, so all these others purchasing products without attending ... this "undue influence" you've read about causing them to buy is working how exactly? Do they need tinfoil hats?
I don't think they seem to exert overt influence, I've heard (or read) people attest to this.
And I quote re this "undue influence"/cult claims from author and behavioural psychologist Dr Shad Helmstetter, who studied Amway for 6 years -
"Working in the field of human behavior, I've studied the cults for many years. The Amway business is the opposite of cult psychology."
With regard to other allegations of Amway being a cult, he replied in an interview -
"The old myth that Amway is a cult is supported only by people who are either misinformed or uninformed. I would like to examine their research."
I corresponded with both Rick Ross and Steve Hassan on their Amway pages and both of them admitted that they had not done any research at all into Amway, they were basing their claims on emails they'd received. Talk about self-selecting sample bias! Also interesting to note that virtually every email they received was from people who'd been involved with the one group and it's offshoots, a minority of Amway.
My opinion isn't based in these so called facts. My opinion is based in your robotic response,
My "robotic" response ... many you have experience with some pretty damn sophisticated robots ....
I'd suggest any "roboticness" comes from the fact you're doing little more than spout the same old "robotic" discredit claims I've heard a hundred times before.
testimony I've read here and other places on the net, my own limited experience with Amway and other MLM's, and the "facts" about these "networks" that are part in parcel with the Amway "culture".
*What* Amway culture? How do you get a "culture" when there are huge numbers of sub-groups that never have a thing to do with each other? The idea is absurd.
I'm not telling people to not buy Amway products. In fact, I'm telling them to pay full price! Just don't get suckered into trying to get a discount, or making money off it.
Oh yeah ... that'd be dumb ... getting sucked into buying stuff you wanted, cheaper, or heaven forbid, making money! How bad could that be!