CIT Presents Their Exhaustive Witness List - Yep, Still No Flyover Witness

[dtugg]

Again, its in the paper and the related presentation.

See:

9/11: The North Side Flight Path

"9/11: The North Side Flight Path" Technical Supplement

Please stop spamming Cap'n Bob's/Turboidiot's garbage. It has been destroyed here already.

I am just looking for a simple map with a path draw that has the plane going on both the fantasy NoC path and over the south parking lot. The garbage "paper" doesn't have that.

Please. It will be funny.

 

[T.A.M.]

I assume they first had to pay the thirteen witnesses for telling lies about the flight path. After that, they payed England to corroborate the faked flight path described by those witnesses by claiming that he and his cab were never where the known photos showed him to be. ... PROFIT! Sounds like a helluva plan!

honestly, seriously, HOW RELIABLE do you think their recollections are, with respect to the mere seconds (or less) that a plane flew over them, PRIOR to the impact at the Pentagon, 6-8 years ago (depending on the interview time).

I would take any witness testimony now (or in the last 5 years) with a grain of salt, to say the least.

CIT lead witnesses, Cherry Pick, and IGNORE all contradicting evidence to their insane theory.

Now I have already wasted too much of my time on their crap.

TAM

 

[T.A.M.]

Its been almost 2 years since Craig promised there would be arrests soon due to their "earth shattering" evidence. Still nothing...no authorities taking action, not even any noteworthy media coverage...

CIT, DOM, and PFT are exhibits A, B, and C for the "insanity" section of the TM movement.

If CE has decided to follow their tripe, it will make it very easy to place him and Ozric/Dom on ignore.

TAM

 

[A W Smith]

Oh man this is a hilarious thread.

Ce, UnLoved ReBel is trying to say (not very clealy) that Paik places the plane SOC, when in fact, he places the plane over the Navy Annex (a detail just as fatal to the official story btw) and trys to make the angle fit for the plane to impact.

He could not actually see the Citgo, but if you extend the exact path he drew on the satellite image from south of Coumbia Pike to over the Navy Annex, the plane flys north of the Citgo.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/paik2antenna.jpg



Don't you get it- Caustic Logic was owned!

He had no idea what he was talking about.

He even lamely admits that he "didn't look into it that deeply" when Craig grills him on witness POV.

Hear Craig owning Caustic Logic in debate.

He couldn't even see the navy annex from where he was standing. Which was???? Come on tell us ozzic

 

[Mr.Herbert]

Once again...an appropriate time to post this:

 

[Mr.Herbert]

Neither PFT nor CIT have ever claimed that.
Please source either PFT or CIT saying the plane "made a 90 degree turn over the Pentagon".

Dom, you do claim that the plane banks prior to the "bombs" being detonated.

 

[The Big Dog]

Again, its in the paper and the related presentation.

See:

9/11: The North Flight Path

"9/11: The North Flight Path" Technical Supplement

NOT ANOTHER Citiot. I love those papers! They have absolutely nothing to do with CIT's made up flight path, hell the path they discuss directly contradicts all of the CIT witnesses. Hey Ozric, by the way, how the hell does a plane that is practically laying on its side pull out of a descent and go up and over the Pentagon at the impact site with no one at all seeing it??

Frauds!! Keep up the good work!

 

[TJM]

Why does CIT keep sending these clowns over here?

It reminds of Sylvester the cat when he has to run the gauntlet of dozens of vicious bulldogs to get to the prize. As much as he tries to disguise himself he can never disguise his true intentions and ends up getting chewed to bits by the bulldogs as a direct result.

Keep sending them over though, it's great entertainment.

 

[Ozric]

CIT lead witnesses, Cherry Pick, and IGNORE all contradicting evidence to their insane theory.

I took the liberty of bumping TLB's thread, Question for Evilbiker so that T.A.M can provide evidence for the bolded claim above.

 

[BCR]

I took the liberty of bumping TLB's thread, Question for Evilbiker so that T.A.M can provide evidence for the bolded claim above.

So, you concede the 'cherry picking' and 'ignoring evidence' parts of his statement?

 

[The Big Dog]

So, you concede the 'cherry picking' and 'ignoring evidence' parts of his statement?

It would appear so....

 

[T.A.M.]

I took the liberty of bumping TLB's thread, Question for Evilbiker so that T.A.M can provide evidence for the bolded claim above.

THE CIT bullcrap has already taken up more time of mine then it deserves. I have no intention of wading through their nonsense to provide you with evidence. And before you ask, nope, not gonna retract my statement.

Take it somewhere where they care DOM.

TAM

 

[BCR]

Yes, a line drawn consistent with the radar data shows a path perfectly consistent with both Paik and Zakheim's accounts. It is also a perfect match for Morin's observation of the plane dropping below the trees as he stepped out into the lot. It takes a lot of cherry-picking and ignoring of evidence to get anything else out these eyewitness accounts and radar data.

 

[beachnut]

Yes.

Unlike the official flight path, the north side flight path is both witness compatible and aerodynamically possible.

See:

"9/11: The North Flight Path" Technical Supplement.

and

9/11: Attack on the Pentagon

Your flight path is impossible; too many Gs. Prove your delusions with math and physics. Oops, can you do math and physics?

Oops; south of CITGO and he is looking at his pointing in this cut; whereas the idiots at CIT have to cut and make up your photo post.

Please draw the flight path you have. Show me the flight path.

CIT make up lies to sell DVDs; are you part of the scam or do you lack knowledge and skills to comprehend 911?

 

[1337m4n]

100% of eyewitnesses corroborate the plane hitting the Pentagon.

This is all that really needs to be said.

 

[TJM]

Ozric has been banned as a sock puppet of previously banned member TheLoneBedouin.

Damn it! My money was on TLB. Next time I'll speak up.

ETA: All hail the Hypno-Toad!

 

[dtugg]

I thought for sure he was Dom/TC329/Terrocell.

 

[Reheat]

I thought for sure he was Dom/TC329/Terrocell.

Is there any significant difference?

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Heh... I was lurking and thought the posts sounded familiar... while I'm making a brief jump into the subject, I ended up spending some time today looking at the archival news footage that was done live as the events were unfolding. I've seen multiple vids, and none that I've seen involve any such flyover. The witnesses whom were spoken to all stated that the passenger jet slammed into the building. And barring the crap that PFT puts out as proof, their alternatives for what they believe was done to the Pentagon to make it "look realistic" have always been unrealistic

 

[dtugg]

Is there any significant difference?

I never saw Craig/TLB (or anybody besides Dom for that matter) talk about the crazy UFO that was supposedly flying underneath power lines at Shanksville.