• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

BNP leaflet through my door

[Rolfe looks out of the window.]

Blue sky, some fluffy white clouds, sunshine. Pleasant breeze. Not oppressively hot.

And you can go to Spain for a fortnight if you like. What more do you want?

Rolfe.

Italy rather than Spain and I'm sold.
 
I've been fortunate to have worked in Scotland on a number of occasions and can offer the following observations:

- the natives are friendly - even towards the English
- the cities are the nicest in the world
- the food and drink is exceptional
- the summers are glorious
- try not to be there for the long cold damp winter nights

I was in Perth for three months November to January and swear that I never even saw daylight much less sunlight

Yep have to agree with this though for some reason no matter what time of year I go to Edinburgh it is freezing cold in the early hours of the morning. Maybe just my luck.
 
Sitting sheltered from the scottish rain here, I'm going to try and bring us all back on topic a little.

Their literature is scaremongering (i.e. "I'm a doctor and I know the effect that immigration is having on the NHS") without recognising that the NHS couldn't operate without immigrants (the two doctors in the flat below are from Sri Lanka and The Netherlands).
Well, to be fair, that's not exactly convincing evidence that either the NHS is not under strain, or that the current immigration situation is not making it worse - whichever is the tact you were trying to take with that.
I'm certain our current immigration policies are having some kind of effect on the NHS, and employment as well. I don't know how detrimental or beneficial, but from my own experience I haven't seen much positive effect. Now, I'm certainly not supporting a move to remove immigrants, rather than a review of how we manage intake, but it doesn't seem to me that we should simply dismiss it, and definitely not by suggesting that we have some foreign doctors and that will right the balance of the toll on the NHS.

It just scares me a little that all it takes for racism to rear its ugly head is a 4% drop in GDP. What scares me a lot is that the BNP think that the area in which I live (comfortably off, muti-ethnic) is a fertile recruiting ground
I don't think racism was ever too far away, though.
 
Well, to be fair, that's not exactly convincing evidence that either the NHS is not under strain, or that the current immigration situation is not making it worse - whichever is the tact you were trying to take with that.
I'm certain our current immigration policies are having some kind of effect on the NHS, and employment as well. I don't know how detrimental or beneficial, but from my own experience I haven't seen much positive effect. Now, I'm certainly not supporting a move to remove immigrants, rather than a review of how we manage intake, but it doesn't seem to me that we should simply dismiss it, and definitely not by suggesting that we have some foreign doctors and that will right the balance of the toll on the NHS.
I'd like to see an independently assembled cost benefit calculation.

It strikes me that the immigrants that people seem to be complaining about particularly are migrant workers. These tend to be young and comparatively healthy and so would seem to present less of a strain on the NHS (with the possible exception of maternity services). What we don't have is a large number of arrivals who are in the group who get the largest per captia benefit from the NHS, the elderly and/or chronically ill.

The economic migrants are, in the main, paying their taxes and NI contributions and so may be net contributors to NHS coffers.

I've searched the internet with my admittedly poor googlind skills and can't find an attempt at an independent quantitative study
 
I've been fortunate to have worked in Scotland on a number of occasions and can offer the following observations:

- the natives are friendly - even towards the English
- the cities are the nicest in the world
- the food and drink is exceptional
- the summers are glorious

If you weren't really planning on sleeping. Daylight hours are far too long.

If Scotland had England's population density then it would have a population of ~30.9 million
 
I have had two leaflets from parties emphasizing green issues and two emphasizing immigration.
Why not jump on both band wagons?
Send em back in a carbon neutral fashion.

AgeGap

Proud to be Green and Racist.
 
Let's hear from the soldier in the leaflet:

Stuart, who left the Army in 1997, first knew about it when it dropped through a relative's letterbox. The dad-of-two, now a corporate manager in London, said he rang the BNP's offices to complain and was told to "**** off".

He told The Sun: "I was completely outraged when I saw this leaflet. I think they got the photo off a website and the quote they've made up. They are scumbags and I'd never vote for them in a million years."

And there was much rejoicing in the land of Adequate.

Great catch! There seems to be little support amongst the armed forces for the BNP. Their core voter base must I think be old ladies who are easily afrighted and tend to come packaged with a bit of casual racism to start with. If so, once that generation dies off, they'll be knackered. :D
 
If you weren't really planning on sleeping. Daylight hours are far too long.


Blackout blinds are your friends. Srsly. Or just get used to sleeping in light.

If Scotland had England's population density then it would have a population of ~30.9 million


Hey, steady on! No need to get carried away. 12 million or so, with repopulation of areas depopulated in the 18th and 19th centuries, might be nice though.

Rolfe.
 
If Kazakhstan had England's population density, it would have 1.19 Billion people.
It actually has 16.4 million.

England is severely overpopulated.
With English people.
Not that I'm criticising or anything, but England is severely in need of an emigration programme.
I suggest starting with all politicians (and yes, we Scots can throw a few out , too) and anyone who votes BNP.
In fact, if they throw out all the politicians, they might eject anyone who is remotely interested in politics too as they'll have no residual function anyway.
Then the civilised and sane English men & women can get back to gardening and moaning about the weather, which is just where we Scots like them.

As for immigration- well, there are a bunch of Pakistanis in Scotland- but to my knowledge none of them ever arrived at the head of an army. That would be the English again. (Of course we did have the odd wander south ourselves, from time to time...)
 
If Kazakhstan had England's population density, it would have 1.19 Billion people.
It actually has 16.4 million.

England is severely overpopulated.

Not so. If England had South Korea's population density it would have a population of ~64 million.
 
Hey, steady on! No need to get carried away. 12 million or so, with repopulation of areas depopulated in the 18th and 19th centuries, might be nice though.

Rolfe.

A lot of those areas are of questionable vability in a modern economy. Any large scale population increases are likely to be city driven.
 
Oh, stop being so boringly practical!

Half seriously, though, I can imagine a more long-term future relying less on urbanisation and making communities in more outlying areas viable again. Even now, the problem is that many rational settlement locations were depopulated before the advent of modern services. If you look at similar locations in other countries that have been continuously inhabited, the services have generally got there one way or another. Re-establishing communities that are no more than piles of stones is a bit harder though - especially given modern planning law, that sees these as not being settlements, and so rural wasteland to be protected.

I saw a bit of a BNP PPB this evening - I gather they said that millions of people were going to vote for them. That would be the lies again, then....

Rolfe.
 
In the last European elections, the racialist baskets polled 5% and around 800,000 votes. So perhaps not millions of votes this time but perhaps a million particularly if a significant proportion of the 2.5 million who voted UKIP switch to the BNP
 
Since I am still too new to these forums to post a link, please look on YouTube for "Muslim Demographics". It will be the video with the big red flag.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to protect your heritage and your way of life from being overrun by another culture.
 
Since I am still too new to these forums to post a link, please look on YouTube for "Muslim Demographics". It will be the video with the big red flag.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to protect your heritage and your way of life from being overrun by another culture.

There is, however, a problem when you use the word 'protect' (insinuating that Asians and Blacks will naturally wish to burn down the Dome and build a terrorist training camp in its ashes). There is also a problem when you think the best way to do this is join a racist, holocaust denying party (I don't assume you are a member, but I do assume you are a slight apologist).

I don't see Labour or the Conservatives wishing to see the entire culture of the UK being eradicated, only to be replaced by the flag of Sharia. And for all that different cultures add to our own (Ever since the arrival of the Windrush our capital city has become defined as the home to all the world), well, that's to be welcomed isn't it?
 
The methods of cultural genocide do not have to be violent, or even orchestrated.
You can simply be "bred out", over time.
I am proud of my Saxon heritage, just as a black man may be proud of his African heritage.
I would prefer my son marry a white woman.
This does not make me a racist.
It is not immoral to want your culture to flourish and prosper over other cultures.
I know nothing of the BNP other than what I have read here, and do not support it or oppose it.
I am an American patriot.
Here, we have the freedom to be racist and deny the holocaust, regardless of how much others might disagree with our viewpoint. If enough people agree with the point of view, we are free to enact laws enforcing those views.
 
Last edited:
The methods of cultural genocide do not have to be violent, or even orchestrated.
You can simply be "bred out", over time.
I am proud of my Saxon heritage, just as a black man may be proud of his African heritage.
...sni[...

Using this type of argument - why should I - someone with a much older "heritage" in this country accept the Saxon invasion of my culture and heritage?

Sorry but it is absolutely ridiculous and sheer nonsense to make the romantic appeals to some idealised and therefore never-existed past "cultures" and so on, especially so in the UK given our history. The UK today is the result of many successful and not-so-successful "invasions", just as the UK of tomorrow will be.

I would prefer my son marry a white woman.
This does not make me a racist.
...snip...

It usually does.

It is not immoral to want your culture to flourish and prosper over other cultures.

...snip...

From my viewpoint it is when that culture will not let me live as I want to.
 

Back
Top Bottom