So Silverstein "pulled" his buildings so he could go broke rebuilding them?

ULTIMA1 said:
It would not be thousands of pounds with small kicker charges.
Click to expand...

"Small kicker charges" cannot reliably destroy a building, and they still don't explain how the demo team was able to set them up while the building was on fire.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes it does make a difference. If the firemen were out of the building before the call was made then the fire commander could have only been talking about the building when he stated pull it.
Click to expand...



It is IMPOSSIBLE to "pull" a 47-story building. It makes equal sense to talk of replacing the points and plugs on a can of creamed corn. You can't grasp the cognitive dissonance of your mad claims.

The owner is told that efforts to save his building a) have been halted; b) are being halted; c) will be halted.

WE DO NOT KNOW WHICH POSSIBILITY IS MOST ACCURATE.
THAT IS BECAUSE WE DO NOT KNOW WHO CALLED SILVERSTEIN OR WHEN THE CALL WAS MADE.

IF WE KNEW WHEN THE CALL WAS MADE, WE WOULD KNOW IF THE MEN HAD ALREADY BEEN PULLED.


BUT WE DON'T!!!!!!!!!!
 
1337m4n said:
"Small kicker charges" cannot reliably destroy a building, and they still don't explain how the demo team was able to set them up while the building was on fire.
Click to expand...

Yes they can when you cut beams and then plane kicker charges to remove the reast of the beams.

Well if you did any research you would know that not all the building was on fire.

The EPA removed the fuel from the ground floor tanks.
 
Do you have an example of someone pulling a 40+ story burning building before or after 9/11?
 
Plus he cannot explain why this mystery "kicker charge" team had to cover up the fact they were in there. He cant explain that either.
 
I think the only thing being "pulled" here is our leg.

Roger cant seem to prove it has ever been done before. He just has this wild conspiracy theory, but no evidence to back it up!

Hilarious reading. :big:
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes they can when you cut beams and then plane kicker charges to remove the reast of the beams.
Click to expand...

This cannot be done within the timeframe of only a few hours.

Well if you did any research you would know that not all the building was on fire.
Click to expand...

It doesn't need to be. The demo team would have had to know in advance exactly which columns needed to be destroyed. They would have had to have a guarantee that not only were those areas not already engulfed in fire, but also that the fire would not spread to those areas during the time that they needed to 1) get to the columns, 2) plant the charges, 3) get out of the building, 4) wait until 5:20 (when the building collapsed). Even if the fire wasn't in any of those areas, there would still most likely be a great deal of smoke which would not only obscure their vision but their breathing as well.

Your fantasy is IMPOSSIBLE.
 
Last edited:
...and you have experience in "pulling" 40+ story burning buildings?

Otherwise, it is just your opinion, with no experience or evidence to back it up.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
This was not a normal operation and the building was already in bad shape.

It would not have taken much to bring it down.
Click to expand...


ok, here's the deal. you provide the team that took this mission, and reports of people that can confirm your claim, and I swear on my life I will believe everything you say from here on out.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
This was not a normal operation and the building was already in bad shape.

It would not have taken much to bring it down.
Click to expand...

(Take 1,000)

"Then what was the need for secrecy?"

The next time you post the same madness, my question will be,

"Then what was the need for secrecy?"

This will be my question each time you post this mad statement.
 
Ladies and gentlemen, this thread has well and fully jumped the shark.

When a twoofer admits that the "official" explanation is physically possible then it's over.

Sword_Of_Truth said:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well with a building that is already damage it would not take much.

Such as a couple beams cut and small kicker charges placed.

But that is just 1 of several ways to do it.
Click to expand...
Behold, the full retreat of the 9/11 truth movement.

Instead of a building made of kryptonite that could withstand everything, and needed to have a full blown controlled demo done with all the CD bells and whistles, we now have a theory that the building was almost completely gone and only a small push was required to send it over the edge.

Ultimas theory predicts a collapse that would be completely indistinguishable from an otherwise "natural" fire and impact induced collapse.
Click to expand...
 
ULTIMA1 said:
This was not a normal operation and the building was already in bad shape.

It would not have taken much to bring it down.
Click to expand...

Wrong again Roger. This is how much steel a "kicker charge" can cut. That's why you have to cut a big square in the column. Try doing this with the building on fire.
charge.jpg
 
Since the firemen were out of the building before the call was made then the fire commander could have only been talking about the building when he stated pull it.
 
UNLoVedRebel said:
That's why you have to cut a big square in the column. Try doing this with the building on fire.
[qimg]http://i625.photobucket.com/albums/tt332/JREFImages/charge.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Yes thats what i stated originally. Maybe you should try reading my post before repsonding.

Also as stated and proven all of the building was not on fire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom