no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[ULTIMA1]

Flight 77 is verified by RADAR, DNA, and FDR. ?

RADAR can not ID a plane with the transponder off, or if the plane goes off the screen.

DNA is not used to ID a plane.

FDR has not been matched to AA77 by serial number.

Do you even know what RADARs are joint ATC and NORAD?

 

[lapman]

RADAR can not ID a plane with the transponder off, or if the plane goes off the screen.

But the controller can tag it the primary.

DNA is not used to ID a plane.

Proof?

FDR has not been matched to AA77 by serial number.

NTSB states that it is not needed if the aircraft ID is not in question. Provide proof that it was.

 

[ULTIMA1]

But the controller can tag it the primary.

Not if the plane completley goes off RADAR.

Proof?

NTSB states that it is not needed if the aircraft ID is not in question. Provide proof that it was.

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

 

[doobiedoright]

You mean kind of like you and your buddy beleivers have nothing either?

Too bad i can show lots of sources that support what i post, but you guys have nothing at all.

When would you be doing that?
Most of if not all you post is hearsay and inadmissible in court!!!!!!!!

 

[ULTIMA1]

When would you be doing that?
Most of if not all you post is hearsay and inadmissible in court!!!!!!!!

Only the past 5 years. The majority of the evidnece i have will prove reasonable doubt of the official story in court. The NSA Critic will be the last nail in the coffin for the official story.

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

 

[doobiedoright]

Only the past 5 years. The majority of the evidnece i have will prove reasonable doubt of the official story in court. The NSA Critic will be the last nail in the coffin for the official story.

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

I have begged you several times to take me to court over this.
Depo day will not be a good one for you sir!
Why all the name calling out of you...lose a argument and have nothing else to use?
By the way your critic dosent say what you think it does and will this be arriving before the next century or what?

 

[beachnut]

RADAR can not ID a plane with the transponder off, or if the plane goes off the screen.

DNA is not used to ID a plane.

FDR has not been matched to AA77 by serial number.

Do you even know what RADARs are joint ATC and NORAD?

RADAR does ID a plane when the transponder goes off. I am a pilot and turning off the transponder gets you in trouble not invisibility!

Next screen...? You keep falling into a pit of ignorance; wait, you jump on purpose.

DNA can ID a plane; Got logic? Prove it can't by an example.

FDR is matched to Flight 77 due to the fact all the information in the FDR is from flights made by Flt 77; over 25 hours of previous flights identified by location in the data in the FDR found with Flight 77 in the Pentagon! CASE CLOSED!


RADAR never lost 77! You are not comprehending the information you post just like the new reporters who posted it and left off the vital information. The RADAR information is recorded; all the stuff on 77 is on file; RADAR never lost 77 and this is part of the physical evidence 77 hit the Pentagon.


After 7 years this is all the evidence you have,

... to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to ...

, simple talk. The CRITIC is funny since it will be more talk of talk which is what the NSA collects; talk. Now talk is real good evidence and when you get your NSA document that has people saying 93 was shot down and RADAR was lost for 77; you will have more talk to go with your opinions on 911. Talk of talk about 911.

Us "poeple" understand RADAR why don't you?

 

[BenBurch]

I suppose that all those Bear and Bison bombers the USSR had could have attacked any time they wanted since our radars had no ability to track them without transponders...

 

[lapman]

Not if the plane completley goes off RADAR.

Mature adults know can follow a track of a radar return and easily figure out where the aircraft went and when the primary only return re-appears, they know which aircraft it is.

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

That's really kewel of you to do that. Of course, when it comes back not stating what you want it to, you will ignore it like you do the other evidence that has been posted. Us mature adults understand that a FOIA request means nothing until you get the information. So, keep us posted. BTW, what is the request? I'm sure that 911files and/or MikeW has already done it.

 

[A W Smith]

Not if the plane completley goes off RADAR.

It never did. It went off radar display

 

[EvilBiker]

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

Yeah, yeah, you keep saying that. You filed that FOIA request some months ago, and still have not had a comeback. I wouldn't call it recent anymore, frankly. At this stage, all I can applaud you on is the fact that you managed to actually fill out an FOIA request. Good job.

Let me know via PM when you actually get a result from that FOIA request that you filed, will you?

That fact that you filed an FOIA request does not really count as evidence of anything, except perhaps that you can write or type coherently. I'm still somewhat in doubt about both.

 

[Gavron]

Only the past 5 years. The majority of the evidnece i have will prove reasonable doubt of the official story in court. The NSA Critic will be the last nail in the coffin for the official story.

So...are you saying you are taking this information to court then?

Will we see a Roger Misner vs US Govt court case coming up this year?

 

[DGM]

RADAR can not ID a plane with the transponder off, or if the plane goes off the screen.

DNA is not used to ID a plane.

FDR has not been matched to AA77 by serial number.

Do you even know what RADARs are joint ATC and NORAD?

Ah...... Roger, If it wasn't AA 77, then what 757 painted like an American airlines plane do you think it was?

And while we're on that subject, How many thousand people do you think it would take to pull off your (proposed) switch-a-roo?

 

[Audible Click]

I have begged you several times to take me to court over this.
Depo day will not be a good one for you sir!
Why all the name calling out of you...lose a argument and have nothing else to use?
By the way your critic dosent say what you think it does and will this be arriving before the next century or what?

What is an NSA CRITIC?

 

[Mr. Skinny]

What is an NSA CRITIC?

I put what little I could find over in this thread in Community. I edited my post over there after you asked the same question.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4739443#post4739443

 

[FineWine]

RADAR can not ID a plane with the transponder off, or if the plane goes off the screen.

DNA is not used to ID a plane.

FDR has not been matched to AA77 by serial number.

Do you even know what RADARs are joint ATC and NORAD?

You keep repeating the same debunked nonsense over and over, desperately hoping something will change.

The human remains of the passengers and crew of AA77 found inside the Pentagon strongly indicate that the plane crashed there. To pretend otherwise is insane, as alternate explanations for their presence are utterly fantastic.

The FDR found inside the Pentagon establishes clearly the identity of the plane.

You are attempting to argue about radar with pilots and crash investigators. You know nothing about this subject.

With the exception of the pixilated Heiwa and his mindless echoes, nobody here humiliates himself more regularly than you.

 

[Wolrab]

First off, I'd like to thank everyone for quoting U1 thus defeating my use of the ignore feature .
I have noticed he continually says,"Too bad i (sic) can show lots of sources that support what i (sic) post, but you guys have nothing at all."
So to U1, I beg you to post your sources or STFU.

To everyone else, please don't quote the jacka... him. I love your responses and have learned a lot, I know what he has to say (nothing) but when I actually read his posts, I fear my eyes will end up coming unattached and end up spinning freely in their sockets!

 

[FineWine]

I suppose that all those Bear and Bison bombers the USSR had could have attacked any time they wanted since our radars had no ability to track them without transponders...

Thank you. I used to be amazed that people could be so stupid as to imagine that merely turning off the transponder makes a plane invisible. Do they seriously think that the radar systems ringing the U.S. and Canada can be thwarted by flipping a switch?

I have met more than my share of "truthers" now. My previous sentence answers itself: "truthers" don't think at all--they can't.

 

[stateofgrace]

For the record Beachnut has conceded he cannot show evidence that the wheel at the Pentagon is from AA77.

Can you please provide serial numbers for these

If not, why not?

Was the reason these planes crashed determined by the serial numbers of these parts?

Was the identity of these planes determined by the serial numbers of these parts or some other means?

 

[DGM]

Thank you. I used to be amazed that people could be so stupid as to imagine that merely turning off the transponder makes a plane invisible. Do they seriously think that the radar systems ringing the U.S. and Canada can be thwarted by flipping a switch?

I have met more than my share of "truthers" now. My previous sentence answers itself: "truthers" don't think at all--they can't.

Just to be accurate;
There are places in this country that "turning off the transponder" will make you invisible. Flight 93 flew through one of those areas. The US is a big country and no, radar coverage is not seamless. As far as the "truthers" claims go, Total BS.