no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[fitzgibbon]

Why are you guys feeding this obvious troll?

 

[Pardalis]

Why are you guys feeding this obvious troll?

Maybe they're afraid PETA will denounce them if they don't?

 

[BenBurch]

Well i showed facts that AA77 was off RADAR as stated.

No, you show that some writers don't understand what happened, and you are no smarter than they were.

When a transponder goes off, all the disappears is the ACTIVE return and the little number-letter tag on the scope. The PASSIVE return is still there, WAS still there and never disappeared until the last few seconds when the aircraft was too low.

So, what you are maintaining is a LIE.

 

[fitzgibbon]

Maybe they're afraid PETA will denounce them if they don't?

Wouldn't that be PETT? Just askin'.

/derail

 

[Shalamar]

He is trying to state that the transponder signal was lost from the screen when actually the plane went off the RADAR also as shown in several sources..

No plane crashed into the Pentagon then! OMG!

 

[Mangoose]

ULTIMA1 has really got me wondering. Did an iceberg really hit the Titanic? There are no photos of it. No films of the crash into the ship exist. There were no samples saved of the ice. No proper investigation and identification of the cause from evidence at the scene. All we have are the conflicting accounts of eyewitnesses, which ULTIMA1 says leave much room for "reasonable doubt". Maybe it was a Prussian torpedo. Or maybe a bomb in the cargo hold. Or maybe an "inside job" by White Star Line to cash in on insurance. Who knows! We must tell those liars who abide by the "official iceberg story" to be honest that they don't really know what happened.

 

[Hans]

You will note they didn't verify the serial numbers of the Titanic...looks like the scum, those evil ' THEY' are hiding something

 

[lapman]

He is trying to state that the transponder signal was lost from the screen when actually the plane went off the RADAR also as shown in several sources..

None of them official sources. Sorry, without the NTSB, FBI or FAA official documents, you have nothing. Your rules.

 

[TSR]

ULTIMA1 has really got me wondering. Did an iceberg really hit the Titanic?

.
Courtesy my great and good friend The Mad Revisionist
.

 

[ULTIMA1]

None of them official sources. Sorry, without the NTSB, FBI or FAA official documents, you have nothing. Your rules.

You mean kind of like you and your buddy beleivers have nothing either?

Too bad i can show lots of sources that support what i post, but you guys have nothing at all.

 

[Mangoose]

Too bad i can show lots of sources that support what i post, but you guys have nothing at all.

 

[FineWine]

You mean kind of like you and your buddy beleivers have nothing either?

Too bad i can show lots of sources that support what i post, but you guys have nothing at all.

Unfortunately for you, most of your links support the sane position and destroy yours.

 

[Gorgonian]

I think when the transponder was turned off it actually transformed the plane in the a stealth bomber, too. That is obviously what he's getting at. You do realize his facts and evidence prove that, right? Come on, try to keep up.

 

[lapman]

You mean kind of like you and your buddy beleivers have nothing either?

Too bad i can show lots of sources that support what i post, but you guys have nothing at all.

And we have shown you lots of sources that say different. More importantly, your own official documents do not support you. The email you got from the NTSB states that serial numbers are not required for aircraft ID. That specifically implies that if there is another means, like DNA of registerd passengers, they will use that instead. Of course, this is something mature adults understand.

 

[ULTIMA1]

The email you got from the NTSB states that serial numbers are not required for aircraft ID.

What e-mail from the NTSB?

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

 

[lapman]

What e-mail from the NTSB?

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

Wow, you aren't mature enough to remember this:

NTSB investigators rarely encounter a scenario when the identification of an accident aircraft is not apparent. But during those occasions, investigators will record serial numbers of major components, then contact the manufacturer of those components in an attempt to determine what aircraft the component was installed upon.

There are quite a few posts about this.

ETA: So, where is your proof that serial numbers would be required for AA77?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Wow, you aren't mature enough to remember this:
There are quite a few posts about this.

That was not an e-mail to me was it?, you really are immature aren't you?

ETA: So, where is your proof that serial numbers would be required for AA77?

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

 

[lapman]

Here you will find some information
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB165/faa7.pdf
A 12/16/2007 public correspondence e-mail inquiry of the NTSB posed the following question:

"Will the NTSB refer to recovered aircraft component serial number data, to determine the positive ID of an aircraft following a mishap, in the absence of other identifying data?"

The following e-mail response was provided by a Susan Stevenson of the NTSB on 12/26/2007:

"Yes. NTSB investigators rarely encounter a scenario when the identification of an accident aircraft is not apparent. But during those occasions, investigators will record serial numbers of major components, and then contact the manufacturer of those components in an attempt to determine what aircraft the component was installed upon."

Ok, my mistake. That was the same response I got to my request from the NTSB as well. I thought that you were mature enough to have tried put in an inquiry yourself to verify the information you cut and pasted from another site. That's what a real analyst would do.

 

[lapman]

I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

This coming from someone that ignores evidence and relies solely on cherry picked news articles and claims they or official sources? More than ample evidence from official sources have been posted. Like the official email from the NTSB that clearly states that serial numbers are rarely needed to ID an aircraft. Instead, you demand unreleased documents that you know we cannot provide and claim victory while you hide your head in the sand so you won't see what has been posted. So, where is your proof that serial numbers were required to ID AA77?

 

[beachnut]

That was not an e-mail to me was it?, you really are immature aren't you?



I have recently filed an FOIA request with the NTSB to shut up you immature, closed minded poeple that have no clue whats going on and no evidence at all to support the official story.

Are you posting to yourself again.

Did you finally get RADAR right? NO; or you figured out you were wrong and are avoiding being caught again.

The post you made had the NTSB say there was no need for serial numbers in identifying planes that are known. The evidence on 911 is easy to use and see which plane hit which location. It does take logic and knowledge, a little research; why have you failed to figure out which planes were involved?

Flight 77 is verified by RADAR, DNA, and FDR. All with a single serial numbers needed. Some idiot who joined p4t made up the serial number insanity due to ignorance; why do you repeat failed ideas?