Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dave Rogers said:
Parallax.

Dave
Click to expand...

Parallax,n....def. [The apparent displacement of an object as seen from two different points that are not on a line with the object]

I don't think that will cover it all Dave. Not even close. Is that your full explanation ?
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I don't think that will cover it all Dave. Not even close. Is that your full explanation ?
Click to expand...

My full explanation would be that it's mind-numbingly obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that it's parallax, but that might be construed as a personal attack.

Your explanation, I take it, is that the entire video footage of 9/11 was forged, that the conspirators placed every building in NYC correctly, that they remembered that the Verrazano Bridge should go somewhere, but nobody could quite figure out where?

ETA: So instead of choosing a location, sticking with it and hoping nobody would notice, they decided to keep it moving because that's somehow less likely to be noticed?

And you don't think that's stupid?

Dave
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
What do you think then ?....Forged video ?...Optical illusions ?
http://blip.tv/file/1903933/
Click to expand...

How did the fakers of 9/11 produce the roar that a million New Yorkers heard as the planes sped along the lenght of Manhattan, 10 or more miles, low and fast?

The planes that hit WTC1 and WTC2 were not an illusion or a fabrication.

Any discussion based on anything but that is delusional.
 
TV fakery is kind of pointless when millions of people on the ground witness it first hand... *sigh* why again are we getting into no-planes?
 
Dave Rogers said:
My full explanation would be that it's mind-numbingly obvious to anyone with a half-functioning brain that it's parallax, but that might be construed as a personal attack.

Your explanation, I take it, is that the entire video footage of 9/11 was forged, that the conspirators placed every building in NYC correctly, that they remembered that the Verrazano Bridge should go somewhere, but nobody could quite figure out where? And you don't think that's stupid?

Dave
Click to expand...

You seem to be far more concerned with personal attacks than I am Dave. They don't bother me much at all and I almost never resort to using them.

I only said that I find the video interesting- you are the one who is getting all excited about it. That makes me think I should record and file it away for future reference. You never know when it might slot into the bigger picture.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
You seem to be far more concerned with personal attacks than I am Dave. They don't bother me much at all and I almost never resort to using them.

I only said that I find the video interesting- you are the one who is getting all excited about it. That makes me think I should record and fille it away for future reference. You never know when it might slot into the bigger picture.
Click to expand...

Two civilian jets hit the WTC towers. Any discussion about WTC that doesn't accept is not based in reality and is delisuonal.

If the shoe fits....
 
bill smith said:
I only said that I find the video interesting- you are the one who is getting all excited about it. That makes me think I should record and file it away for future reference. You never know when it might slot into the bigger picture.
Click to expand...

Hey, everybody, this looks like the bill smith MO - if someone on JREF denies it, it must be true. Shall we see who can make him believe the stupidest theory?

Dave
 
JimBenArm said:
Well, then, who? I want to know if I can win that contest. Although I'm not sure what could be stupider than no-planes.
Click to expand...

That investigation is still sub judice you might say and so cannot be discussed.
2B or not 2B1....is that you are saying ? Is that the question ? lol
 
Last edited:
bill thinks that NWO agents have infiltrated this forum in order to discredit twoofer morons and I assume that he thinks that Dave is one of them. Who else is a NWO agent, in you expert opinion, bill?
 
dtugg said:
bill thinks that NWO agents have infiltrated this forum in order to discredit twoofer morons and I assume that he thinks that Dave is one of them. Who else is a NWO agent, in you expert opinion, bill?
Click to expand...

I couldn't say for sure although there can be little doubt that government agency people are present in the threads. They will show up bit by bit. One thing I have heard is that they like to use the word 'trivial'. So I guess we can expect to see a lot of that word from here on in eh ? lol

PS that's twice today that I have been mysteriously transported to another thread. I'm pretty sure I didn't do it delibertely.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4734764#post4734764
 
Last edited:
alexi_drago said:
Very interesting indeed and a great advert for whatever editing software was used as it really shows that even someone with absolutely no knowledge of video or film can use it.
Click to expand...

It is a very strange video, and you have an exellent point there.
I just find it hard to belive anyone is really that dumb and not just dishonest. Do they really belive that brigde is always to the left of the towers, no matter from wicht angle you look.

(I want that software.)
 
bill smith said:
I couldn't say for sure although there can be little doubt that government agency people are present in the threads. They will show up bit by bit. One thing I have heard is that they like to use the word 'trivial'. So I guess we can expect to see a lot of that word from here on in eh ? lol

PS that's twice today that I have been mysteriously transported to another thread. I'm pretty sure I didn't do it delibertely.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4734764#post4734764
Click to expand...

Man, I couldn't make this stuff up if I tried! "Trivial' is a word used a lot by NWO agents? Who told you that? The voices in your head, perhaps?

And I suppose that the NWO is responsible for you being "mysteriously transported" between threads too, right?

I think I've told you this before, but I am not even convinced that you are for real. I'll continue responding to you as if you are because it is much funnier to me that way.
 
bill smith said:
PS that's twice today that I have been mysteriously transported to another thread. I'm pretty sure I didn't do it delibertely.
Click to expand...

You're aware there's a third option?




What's hilarious is that it isn't the first time a Twoofer has hit "nominate" instead of "reply," and yet each one who has done so always suspects someone else did it to him, on purpose, just to screw with him. His trivial little post isn't where he thinks he put it, so the NWO is on the move again!

None of them considered they might have just made a mistake. I guess because they can't conceive the possibility? :boggled:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom