no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[ULTIMA1]

The identity of the plane was known right away. DNA identifications take time. .

But the FBI must verify the identity of the plane for a criminal investigation, thats why the NTSB was called in to identify parts.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Radar tracked Flight 77 to the Pentagon. A plane crashed at the Pentagon.

Show me the documents from the FBI or NTSB about identifying planes with RADAR for a criminal investigation.

 

[BenBurch]

But the FBI must verify the identity of the plane for a criminal investigation, thats why the NTSB was called in to identify parts.

 

[JoeyDonuts]

Ooooh, and it's a YouTube video! The unchallenged golden standard of evidentiary proof to the truther - and the cognitively challenged.

This'll be good.

 

[tsig]

Ooooh, and it's a YouTube video! The unchallenged golden standard of evidentiary proof to the truther - and the cognitively challenged.

This'll be good.

So that's why they have trouble reading. They are used to being shown actions and then having those actions explained for them.

 

[Pardalis]

"Ultima", is that a new kind of alkaline battery?

It goes on and on, and on....

 

[lapman]

Show me the documents from the FBI or NTSB about identifying planes with RADAR for a criminal investigation.

It's interesting how you require specific documents, yet brush off any request for you to provide the same.

 

[beachnut]

It's interesting how you require specific documents, yet brush off any request for you to provide the same.

The poor comprehension free NSA agent.

The FBI used the following reports to identify the planes on 911 along with other evidence.

These are the documents used by the FBI from the NTSB.

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/foia_fri.htm Reports here include the RADAR used by the FBI from the NTSB to show 77 was really the correct choice they already knew on 911! These reports made it clear they were correct.

77 impacted the Pentagon and it was known on 911! These are the documents which confirm the other evidence. It there a term for a lack of comprehension skill? Some learning disability?

 

[Metullus]

Using ULTIMA1's standards of evidence it is impossible to know:

1. What country's naval forces attacked Pearl Harbor;
2. What caused the explosions in Hiroshima & Nagasaki in August 1945;
3. Who was Chancellor of Germany in 1941;
4. Who signed the Declaration of Independence;
5. Who won the 1919 World Series;
or,
6. Whether Julius Caesar was assassinated on the ides of March 44 BC.

ULTIMA1, do you have the same doubts about these events as you do about AA77?


** Lest anyone consider this post to be off topic - please reconsider: I am trying to figure out what ULTIMA1 considers to be enough evidence to support the fact of any historical event.

 

[Bobert]

The ignore button is a wonderful tool!

 

[FineWine]

Show me the documents from the FBI or NTSB about identifying planes with RADAR for a criminal investigation.

Beachnut has shown the radar track a dozen times. Your pathology prevents you from comprehending what you are seeing.

 

[alienentity]

Hi guys,

Here's a relevant page from the FDR, extracted from the NTSB document. I'll also include the pics of the actual unit being removed for data extraction.

cheers

 

[Trojan]

But the FBI must verify the identity of the plane for a criminal investigation, thats why the NTSB was called in to identify parts.

Please show the federal rules of evidence that requires the identificaion of the individual parts, as oppossed to identification of the aircraft.

 

[Jackanory]

Please show the federal rules of evidence that requires the identificaion of the individual parts, as oppossed to identification of the aircraft.

I would like Ultima1 to to tell us which aircraft parts would actually confirm it to be AA77 and which aircraft parts would simply confirm it as being a 757?

 

[BenBurch]

Has it occurred to U1, do you suppose, that one might want to ID parts because one might want to know WHICH parts one was looking at in a mangled mass? You might need an expert for that. And you ID the pilot's yoke and control column, lets say, but since it CAN only be from one plane, nobody would ever check to see its serial numbers, IF ANY, as it was never material to the case.

 

[TexasJack]

HI, got those pics of serial numbers matching TWA 800 yet? You have had ample time.

 

[BCR]

I would like Ultima1 to to tell us which aircraft parts would actually confirm it to be AA77 and which aircraft parts would simply confirm it as being a 757?

I have U1 on ignore, but did he miss the part of the video I posted where the NTSB was going through the aircraft debris and parts with the FBI on the evening of 9/11? So the NTSB DID check the parts and identified them in the presence of the FBI. I don't understand the issue here.

 

[alienentity]

I have U1 on ignore, but did he miss the part of the video I posted where the NTSB was going through the aircraft debris and parts with the FBI on the evening of 9/11? So the NTSB DID check the parts and identified them in the presence of the FBI. I don't understand the issue here.

Neither does he, apparently.

btw, you look good with glasses.

 

[ULTIMA1]

The poor comprehension free NSA agent.

The FBI used the following reports to identify the planes on 911 along with other evidence.

Poor little investigator wannabe. You can only keep repeating about FDR and RADAR but have ZERO physcial evidence to back it up.

 

[ULTIMA1]

ULTIMA1, do you have the same doubts about these events as you do about AA77? .

No, we have plenty of evidence for those events. We have very little evidence for 9/11.