no serial numbers were identified from flight 77

[TJM]

Now, if the plane that he originally got on was not the same as the one that crashed, how do you explain the above scenario?

I am not the one who states that i know what happened that day, you and your believer buddies do, but have no real evidence to support this fantasy.

No, you are the one who continues to dodge the question.

 

[ULTIMA1]

No, you are the one who continues to dodge the question.

Whats it got to do with what happened on 9/11? And DNA is not used to ID a plane.

 

[TJM]

Whats it got to do with what happened on 9/11? And DNA is not used to ID a plane.

Afraid to answer the question?

 

[ULTIMA1]

Afraid to answer the question?

NO its just i do not deal in fantasy, i deal in reallity, you should try it sometime.

 

[TJM]

NO its just i do not deal in fantasy, i deal in reallity, you should try it sometime.

You should try answering a direct question instead of being intellectually dishonest. It makes you look like a coward.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You should try answering a direct question instead of being intellectually dishonest. It makes you look like a coward.

reported breach of rule 12.

 

[TJM]

reported breach of rule 12.

Yes, please report me.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You should try answering a direct question instead of being intellectually dishonest. It makes you look like a coward.

Maybe if it was a real question instead of a childs fantasy i would answer it.

 

[TJM]

Maybe if it was a real question instead of a childs fantasy i would answer it.

It's actually a valid question but it's forcing you to take a position which you can't defend, which is causing you problems. In the future you can avoid this kind of discomfort by not making vapid claims you cannot defend to begin with.

 

[ULTIMA1]

It's actually a valid question but it's forcing you to take a position which you can't defend, which is causing you problems. In the future you can avoid this kind of discomfort by not making vapid claims you cannot defend to begin with.

NO its not a valid question.

Also anybody with basic common sense and basic intelligence can understand that DNA is not used to ID planes in a criminal investigation.

END OF STORY.

 

[TJM]

NO its not a valid question.

Also anybody with basic common sense and basic intelligence can understand that DNA is not used to ID planes in a criminal investigation.

END OF STORY.

Are you really this obtuse?

Just admit you don't want to answer the question instead of dodging it.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Just admit you don't want to answer the question instead of dodging it.

Just admit the question is a childish fantasy. Nothing to do with the reallity of what happened on 9/11.

 

[TJM]

Just admit the question is a childish fantasy. Nothing to do with the reallity of what happened on 9/11.

OK genius, here's the question in 9/11 context. If 77 did not hit the pentagon, how did the passenger's DNA GET THERE.

 

[ULTIMA1]

OK genius, here's the question in 9/11 context. If 77 did not hit the pentagon, how did the passenger's DNA GET THERE.

Who said that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon?

 

[TJM]

Answer the question.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Answer the question.

We do not have all the evidence and reports to know what happened that day.

 

[TJM]

You are hopeless.

Good bye.

 

[NobbyNobbs]

I have answered it like a 100 times over a long time.

Please pay attention.

WE DO NOT HAVE ALL THE FACTS, EVIDENCE AND REPORTS TO KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED THAT DAY.

We need to have the evidence and reports that have been released yet to know what actually happened that day, if you do not ahve them then all your psoting is theories and not facts.

You haven't really answered it, though. Essentially, the question is: what evidence could be provided that you would accept as not being able to be faked?

Whats it got to do with what happened on 9/11? And DNA is not used to ID a plane.

Directly, no. Indirectly, yes.

DNA is used to identify a person. If we know the person got on the plane (luggage, tickets, boarding pass, family waving goodbye) and we know he couldn't have gotten off (tracked by radar until a few moments before the crash), then yes, the DNA identifies the plane.

Can you suggest a plausible scenario where the guy got off the plane between the time he got on and the explosion?

 

[ULTIMA1]

what evidence could be provided that you would accept as not being able to be faked?

Actual facts and evidence that can be verified, also official FBI and NTSB criminal reports.

 

[ULTIMA1]

You haven't really answered it, though. Essentially, the question is: what evidence could be provided that you would accept as not being able to be faked?


DNA is used to identify a person. ?

But DNA is not used to ID a plane in a criminal investigation.