JoeyDonuts
Frequencies Not Known To Normals
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,536
Care to explain to us what those discrepancies are with respect to the flight 77 serial numbers you're not authorized to see?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
no serial numbers were identified from flight 77
- Thread starter Edx
- Start date
Care to explain to us what those discrepancies are with respect to the flight 77 serial numbers you're not authorized to see?
Why you fail to ask, why the public is not authorized to analize the serial numbers of the plane pieces. When something is hidden, often there is a reason for it ...
Jref
"a place for blind trust, non-critical thinking in regards of the US-government"
Last edited:
JoeyDonuts
Frequencies Not Known To Normals
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2008
- Messages
- 10,536
I'd say it was for the same reason that technical data regarding specifics of the case has been denied release by FOIA. Law Enforcement. It's most likely integral to whatever case would be applied against senior AQ leadership should they be captured. That's speculation on my part, of course.
The relevant data and evidence has been analized and reviewed by the world's foremost experts in the field. I don't see what unleashing Jason Bermas or David Ray Griffin in a warehouse full of fragmented evidence would accomplish, other than unbridled hilarity as they monkey about with the pieces acting as if they know what they're doing.
I don't have to personally analyze ballistic evidence to be convinced that Seung-Hui Cho was responsible for the VT massacre. I also don't require the government to exhume his remains so I can perform a homemade DNA test on them to be convinced that he's actually dead.
So you think you're entitled to just rifle through the U.S. government's evidence whenever you want? Exactly who the heck do you think you are? Most of the evidence would be so mangled from the crash it wouldn't look like its original form. How would you know the chunk of metal in your hand was a hydraulic component? A piece from an oxygen scrubber? Avionics?
I'd say you'd have to have some forensics experience dealing with airline disasters. And if you really did - odds are you'd be working for the NTSB.
Once again, the truther world displayed for all to see. A world different from reality, where Joe Public is the hero.
Able to access all things, classified documents, private property, parts of an investigation, it does not matter to the 9/11 truther, for in his utopia, we should all be allowed to see everything. As a matter of fact, in trutherland, everything, and I mean EVERYTHING is freely available on the INTERNET.
TAM
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
The 9/11 Truth Movement, "Asking Questions and Ignoring Answers Since 2001"
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
More Accurate;
The 9/11 Truth Movement, "Asking Stupid Questions and
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
You're right, that is better. Thanks.
Alt+F4
diabolical globalist
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 10,017
Then why so few truthers in a nation of over 300 million people? Why does the local NYC truth group only get about 15 people to their monthly meetings? Why is 9/11 truth is almost entirely and Internet phenomena?
BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
There are no eyewitnesses that question the basic story.
Don't say there are unless you are prepared to provide a name. Lets see what they saw and say.
Last edited:
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
Yes but that only proves that the sample was damaged in this way. It does not tell you if the original source of the DNA is truly dead.
TAM
True, and all the fingers and feet and such don't literally prove it, either.
You need;
1. Enough blood to prove exsanguination.
2. A head, or significant portion thereof.
3. A torso.
But for those parts to exist with the people still alive somewhere would point to a "Saw"-like macabre operation in which the government was hiding alive but mutilated people somewhere - and that would require some actual proof before it would enter the realm of the even remotely likely.
Grizzly Bear
このマスクに&#
Once again, the truther world displayed for all to see. A world different from reality, where Joe Public is the hero.
Able to access all things, classified documents, private property, parts of an investigation, it does not matter to the 9/11 truther, for in his utopia, we should all be allowed to see everything. As a matter of fact, in trutherland, everything, and I mean EVERYTHING is freely available on the INTERNET.
TAM
More than anything he and others with the same mindset seem to believe that if ONE SINGLE THING is not authorized for release it somehow discredits the immense volume of other material which still makes for a sufficient conclusion.
Eh who am I kidding? Pretty much the same thing as you're saying but worded differently. They call for perfection, a level of detail which is impossible to satisfy for their standards.
NobbyNobbs
Gazerbeam's Protege
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Messages
- 5,617
Ultima, Kreel, HI: I have a very serious question, and if you don't answer any other, I'd like you to consider answering this one.
You'd like proof that a particular aircraft hit the Pentagon. What sort of proof would be acceptable? What evidence could be presented that couldn't be faked?
I ask because I'm puzzled by the demand for serial numbers. If this whole thing was faked, if the DNA was planted and a bomb went off and the ATC and FDNY and NIST and FBI were all in on it...surely it would be a trivial matter to make sure that any plane parts that were planted were properly labeled?
Before people jump through hoops providing evidence, perhaps you could explain what evidence could be presented that a)couldn't be faked, and b)would convince you that you might be wrong?
You'd like proof that a particular aircraft hit the Pentagon. What sort of proof would be acceptable? What evidence could be presented that couldn't be faked?
I ask because I'm puzzled by the demand for serial numbers. If this whole thing was faked, if the DNA was planted and a bomb went off and the ATC and FDNY and NIST and FBI were all in on it...surely it would be a trivial matter to make sure that any plane parts that were planted were properly labeled?
Before people jump through hoops providing evidence, perhaps you could explain what evidence could be presented that a)couldn't be faked, and b)would convince you that you might be wrong?
BenBurch
Gatekeeper of The Left
NobbyNobbs - Curious, isn't it, that the NWO is über-competent enough to fake this whole thing, but incompetent enough to fail to use the right aircraft parts?
jhunter1163
beer-swilling semiliterate
Nobby:
I can assure you that your question, while eminently reasonable, will be studiously ignored by our resident Truthers.
Thanks for asking, though. We'll be sure to re-ask it every few pages, just to keep it fresh in their minds.
I can assure you that your question, while eminently reasonable, will be studiously ignored by our resident Truthers.
Thanks for asking, though. We'll be sure to re-ask it every few pages, just to keep it fresh in their minds.
Even if it is answered, there are those PORTABLE GOALPOSTS available.
CORed
Penultimate Amazing
Without a serial number, you can't prove that the NWO didn't hijack flight 77, imprison the passengers in a secret camp, and load a different plane with kidnapped homeless people and fly it into the pentagon.
Wake up, sheeple!
In court the evidence you and others say you have will not hold up as real evidence without serial numbers.
The FAA will not release the serial numbers through FOIA, why don't you try to get them if you can just to prove me wrong?
WRONG AGAIN, there are witnesses that question the offical story. Please do research.
NO, so people who state the wheel at the Pentagon is from AA77 are lying.