I am just always completely flabberghasted with the surety that fundamentalists seem to express. Is it really so impossible to express the "This is what I believe, but it's possible I could be wrong" viewpoint? It seems that most Christians can easily say this... and these are the people with whom you can have an intelligent debate.
I am reminded of the family of my Mormon girlfriend (back when we were dating... and back when I was a Mormon... a much more ignorant time of my life). The father worked for NASA. The mother was a high school science teacher. When we first met, I began discussing religion with them. And, I made the mistake of questioning evolution. After all, the Bible clearly lays out how humans were created. So, obviously evolution must be false.
I quickly had a couple of Mormon parents attempting to hold back their laughter at my ridiculous notion. As a couple of scientists, they found the idea of questioning the validity of evolution to be ridiculous. As they quickly explained... the Bible should not really be taken literally. They themselves loved to display the contradictions throughout various passages of this book.
Of course, being Mormon... they certainly held other beliefs that could not be supported by one piece of evidence. The whole "Joseph Smith and the golden plates" story was definitely true in their eyes. But, they were not offended by suggestions that they could be wrong. They readily recognized that their chosen beliefs existed without evidence, and they did not try to pretend that the universe showed any of their beliefs to be self-evident.
For those that express such certainty on subjects for which they cannot provide evidence... how can this be differentiated from sheer delusion?
I don't know any Mormons, but from what you've said, I figure Smith was someone who hit on a way to convert people to his beliefs, whatever they were. I could be convinced his motives were pure, much as my motives are in playing "devil's advocate" in some of the discussions here. I just happen to be one of the many who don't think religions are evil incarnate, but the striving of humans for something better than they experience right now.
Unfortunately, in the Rorschach tests that exemplify religious texts, people will read into them whatever their current biases dictate, hence KK, CD, and hamelekim, all folks with some sort of ax to grind. More often than not, that ax is the product of the actions of significant others in these folks' lives, hence they deserve our pity, not our condemnation.
M.