Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

[kurious_kathy]

Keep dreaming.... COD is never going to capitulate, and he seems wholly incapable of realizing anything (that goes against his religion).

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

 

[paximperium]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

Why are you here? Are you here to hear yourself sound self righteous because are probably the worst hate filled proselytizer around. You don't listen, you don't think and just vomit your hate at others.mYour hate and delusion drives people away from you religion. You should be proud of your achievements.

 

[joobz]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

Yet you pray for the destruction of all life on earth.... Do you not see the evil you wish for?

 

[Lothian]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you

Progress. Many Christians think we are all God's children. I am glad Kathy realises this is not the case and you have to buy into the God cult.

 

[six7s]

Not even one of my 824 posts?

On the contrary

I have read well over 1000 of your posts in several threads and, in all sincerity DOC, I have never once considered that your so-called arguments are anything other than the deluded, nonsensical rantings of a willfully ignorant and monumentally stubborn fool

 

[Elizabeth I]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

In response, may I quote someone who said it so much better than I ever could?

Oh, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah! Jesus Christ on a pogo stick, stop blathering nonsense at us, who think your silly "evidence" is all in your head. It makes my head want to explode! You have absolutely not one iota of an idea of what evidence is, nor do you care. You just spout the same stuff over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over! Saying it a lot doesn't make it true!

 

[kmortis]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

Except for the idea that he created evil.


Hrm....


God doesn't exist. Satan doesn't exist. They are mythological constructs from an iron age tribe that has a REALLY good PR firm.

 

[Ichneumonwasp]

Well, Ok, but Satan exists. Ozzie played him for 20 years.......

Damn I sound like a commercial.

 

[DOC]

I disagree there is no evidence for the truth of Christianity. Here is some evidence:

...

3) the absurdity of the current mainline scientific theory that all the 100 billion galaxies in the known universe (including all of its matter and space) came from something smaller than one atom and this happened by unintelligent random forces.

Er, DOC, old bean, you do realise that even if "the current mainline scientific theory" were to turn out to be wrong, this would not be evidence that Christianity is true, don't you?

The alleged absurdity of one idea is not evidence that another unrelated idea is true. ...

Yes, but I think when some skeptics realize what the current mainstream scientific theory actually says (beyond just the wording - Big Bang) they might just think it is more absurd than any absurdity thinking they may have directed to Christianity.

___

And the current mainstream scientific theory on the beginning of the universe is much more God friendly than the old steady state theory that didn't believe the universe had a beginning. So, from a Christian point of view one could argue that science has gotten closer to the biblical point of view (that been around for thousands of years) that the universe had a definite beginning at a specific point in time.

 

[Hokulele]

Yes, but I think when some skeptics realize what the current mainstream scientific theory actually says (beyond just the wording - Big Bang) they might just think it is more absurd than any absurdity thinking they may have directed to Christianity.

___

And the current scientific theory on the beginning of the universe is much more God friendly than the old steady state theory that didn't believe the universe had a beginning. So, from a Christian point of view one could argue that science has gotten closer to the biblical point of view (that been around for thousands of years), that the universe had a definite beginning at a specific point in time.

We know, you have tried this particular argument from incredulity before. It didn't go very well for you the last time either.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3933986#post3933986

Now, care to post something that is actually on topic for this thread?

 

[six7s]

And the current mainstream scientific theory on the beginning of the universe is much more God friendly than the old steady state theory that didn't believe the universe had a beginning.

More lies for your messiah?

Its obvious that you are plucking this crap from your arse...

Why DOC? Why do you persist in telling silly lies?

 

[Paulhoff]

That's because children of God do not buy the lies of Satan any longer unlike many of you. God is light and truth and in him there is no darkness!

So why then did your so-called god make light, if there was no darkness in it.

Paul

 

[six7s]

@DOC

I say 'lying for your messiah'

The real question is, why don't you make an effort to understand what the scientists are actually saying, and look at the evidence that they use to come to these conclusions, rather than skim reading what a single person on an internet forum presents as a simplified version, and presenting it (in strawman version) as some sort of vain attempt to prove that science says patently foolish things, and that all scientists are clearly idiots?

Others say 'presenting strawmen'

Either way, your credibility is non existent... just like your talking snake-creating god

 

[DOC]

More lies for your messiah?

Its obvious that you are plucking this crap from your arse...

Why DOC? Why do you persist in telling silly lies?

Another "you're a liar, DOC" post with no explanation.

 

[kmortis]

Another "you're a liar, DOC" post with no explanation.

Well, ya see, explanations are not really needed anymore for those kinds of posts. It's really easy to tell when you're lying, you post. Simple really. It's the textual version of a used car salesman. If you bother to honestly answer some of the questions without continuously bringing up evidences that have already been thoroughly trashed, maybe, just maybe we'd start cutting you a break.

Since you've been told this very fact quite a few times now, I'm not hold my breath that this time will be the clincher. In fact, I'm willing to bet a whole quarter that you don't learn from this post.

 

[paximperium]

Another "you're a liar, DOC" post with no explanation.

Reading your post is all the explanation that is necessary. You either have no idea what you are talking about or are making things up. So are you just ignorant or a liar?

 

[six7s]

Another "you're a liar, DOC" post with no explanation.

My previous 'explanations' are still valid

 

[DOC]

We know, you have tried this particular argument from incredulity before. It didn't go very well for you the last time either.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3933986#post3933986

Actually it's not an argument from incredulity when you compare "two" points of view. If one argument seems more absurd than another, than it is logical to believe that the less absurd sounding point of view is more likely to be correct than the more absurd one.

And I am quite satisfied with how my other thread you cited went, I hope people would read it.

 

[paximperium]

Yes, but I think when some skeptics realize what the current mainstream scientific theory actually says (beyond just the wording - Big Bang) they might just think it is more absurd than any absurdity thinking they may have directed to Christianity.

Big difference is that the Big Bang theory is based on observations and evidence and is open to revision.

And the current mainstream scientific theory on the beginning of the universe is much more God friendly than the old steady state theory that didn't believe the universe had a beginning.

Summary: "Big bang is ridiculous therefore it proves god but even if it was true it also proves god."

So, from a Christian point of view one could argue that science has gotten closer to the biblical point of view (that been around for thousands of years) that the universe had a definite beginning at a specific point in time.

No. Your statement just shows your complete and utter ignorance of the Big Bang theory and more special pleading nonsense.

 

[DOC]

Reading your post is all the explanation that is necessary. You either have no idea what you are talking about or are making things up. So are you just ignorant or a liar?

What did I say that was false?