• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The PG Film - Bob Heironimus and Patty

Status
Not open for further replies.
wolftrax wrote:
Which is why it's ridiculous to argue about Patty's or human's arms being longer and the last so many pages in this thread have been a complete waste of time and space.



And what have the last 10,000 pages of Jref Bigfoot posts, been.......phenomenonally productive?? :boggled:
 
wolftrax wrote:
This image says it all.





That picture says nothing about how Patty's arms compare to a human's.

All it says is that Patty's arm length can be equal to the arm length of a person who has been unlucky enough to become engulfed in ratty, re-cycled carpeting.



Oh....(I just remembered).....it does say that Bob's head is just a tad too large to have fit inside of Patty's.
 
Last edited:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=13864&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1241812385[/qimg]


That picture says nothing about how Patty's arms compare to a human's.

All it says is that Patty's arm length can be equal to the arm length of a person who has been unlucky enough to become engulfed in ratty, re-cycled carpeting

thestupiditburns.jpg


Wow. Today is not your day, ol' Sweat.;)
 
OK Sweaty, quitting Effing with us, your arguments have been so thoroughly trashed here, that there is NO WAY you are a Bigfoot Believer, You are really a Bigfoot Skoftic and you are Effing with us. NO one could keep an argument going after all of this could they? Someone help me here, is sweaty truly trying to defend his/her position with THIS???? Or is he/she just Effing with us???



Sure, Drew....they've all been 'thoroughly trashed'. :)


Now.....tell me specifically where the error is in this post of mine...#1464...


Well, then....you have a big problem, neltana, with your computer-animation. :)


Here is your circle diagram, again....

Nelscircles1.gif




Applying what it shows to this image, from mangler's animation....



FF22.jpg




There is a major discrepancy.

In this image, Patty is seen more from the rear, than Bob is....(according to the Poser 7 skeletons).
You can see this very easily, by the wider distance between the shoulder blades on Patty/Fric...compared to the more closely-spaced shoulder blades on Bob/Frac.


So that should mean, according to you...that your elliptical-shaped diagram (and resultant distortions) would apply to the skelton overlayed on Patty, moreso than on Bob.


That being the case....Patty's/Fric's upper arm, seen in the forward part of it's swing....


FF22BB.jpg




....should actually be distorted in such a way that it is appearing shorter than it truly is....(and shorter than Bob's upper-arm).

But yet..........Patty's upper-arm appears longer than Bob's upper-arm.



The 'upper-arm lengths' in mangler's animation are contradictory....BACKWARDS.....from what your "viewed from the rear", elliptical diagram says they should be. :)


Another look at your statement, above...with an added comment, by me...


As the camera addresses the subject more and more to the rear, the perceived length of the "backswing" arm gets longer and longer. (...and the length in the forward half of the swing gets shorter and shorter.............only occasionally. :( )


Brand-new, fresh Update...:)...


The discrepancy between neltana's diagram, and the apparent lengths of Patty McBunny's and Bob's arms is actually doubled, because Bob's arm is seen in it's backswing, which....according to nelly's diagram, should make it appear longer than it would if it was in the forward part of it's swing.

Double the discrepancy......double the fun! :D


Go ahead.....Drew.....trash it! Point out the errors!
 
There are a thousand things that can account for that- the least of which being the distance from the camera.

In reality- NEITHER one "proves" anything other than a visual similarity between rough outlines and movements and honestly I think I could have achieved that much and i have never worn a bigfoot suit.

It does though leave us with Phil Morris looking the "shemile" and Bob H as the "shemozle". Lighting, camera, season and sod not withstanding.

For those who don't know shemile/shemozle (SP) in Yiddish it means ..a shemile is the guy who spills his soup and a shemozle is the guy he spills it on.
 
....should actually be distorted in such a way that it is appearing shorter than it truly is....(and shorter than Bob's upper-arm).

But yet..........Patty's upper-arm appears longer than Bob's upper-arm.



The 'upper-arm lengths' in mangler's animation are contradictory....BACKWARDS.....from what your "viewed from the rear", elliptical diagram says they should be. :)


QUOTE]

Sweaty this is after all the PGF and "special spacial realitivity" applies to all who dare enter.

But lets just give Bob H his due for just this once. I don't need to consider special spacial realivity to give Bob long ape arms. Heck no and he don't need no stinkining arm extensions either. See he agreed to allow his arms to be wrenched from their sockets so's they'd hang nice and long and low as he strutted his stuff. But what POed the lad was after he allowed to be subjected to such torture in the name of artistic excellence was that Roger welshed on the deal and never paid him. Can't say I blame him.
 
Last edited:
(snip)

That being the case....Patty's/Fric's upper arm, seen in the forward part of it's swing....


[qimg]http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w28/SweatyYeti/Patty%20and%20Bob/FF22BB.jpg[/qimg]



....should actually be distorted in such a way that it is appearing shorter than it truly is....(and shorter than Bob's upper-arm).


6 pages and 184 posts later, Sweaty has time to colour individual letters of text but he doesn't have 15 seconds to hang a pencil then paper in front of his face per post #1400. I can't imagine being that determined not to understand something.
 
Oh....(I just remembered).....it does say that Bob's head is just a tad too large to have fit inside of Patty's.

Which means you did not pay attention when I rebutted that argument with definitive measurements. You have yet to show that claim to be accurate. For some reason you ignore any evidence that shows you are wrong and then repeat the same ridiculous statements over and over again. Keep trying to convince yourself that you are right because that is the only person that you are convincing.
 
Last edited:
It does though leave us with Phil Morris looking the "shemile" and Bob H as the "shemozle". Lighting, camera, season and sod not withstanding.

For those who don't know shemile/shemozle (SP) in Yiddish it means ..a shemile is the guy who spills his soup and a shemozle is the guy he spills it on.

Oy vey! What's a matter with you? You developed shpilkes in your geneckteckessoink or what? That's schlemiel and schlemozzle already. So wouldn't Morris be a ganef who made some schlock and took us all for schnooks?
 
Last edited:
Sweaty, the arm is foreshortened. See the dozens of posts already explaining this phenomenon, specifically the ones addressing this point, which you raised somewhere above and which various members, including myself, have already rebutted.
 
Sweaty, the arm is foreshortened. See the dozens of posts already explaining this phenomenon, specifically the ones addressing this point, which you raised somewhere above and which various members, including myself, have already rebutted.

Vort, I promise your life will be much more pleasant if you click on his name, scroll to the bottom, and place him on ignore.
 
Drew you were calling it what you wanted and you wanted to call one posters actions as "effing". I'm simply expanding your terminology to include that the (your word "effing") term pretty much sums up a universal modality here. Do not dump your terminology on me as if I just pulled the terminology out of my hat. I didn't you did. But you do have my permission to call it that if you wish. I prefer to maintain that the atmosphere generated by most of the posters here is designed to become inciting (no not incite full) which reduces this place time and time again to the general communication exchange of what transpires in a junior high school cafeteria.

You mean we're gonna get milk? Cookies too?

Lunch was always my best subject. Straight A's!!
 
SweatyYeti said:
Patty's arms....in proportion to her overall body height....are longer than the average human's arms.

See? That wasn't so hard. So if Dfoot's arm appears to be as long as Patty's in that comparison picture, what does that say about Patty's arms? I'd imagine that for someone who's adamant about Patty's arms being longer than a human's (average or otherwise), they'd insist that it was just an illusion.

As for your comments about Gimlin not cashing in by writing a tell-out book:

Seeing as how Greg Long's book detailing an interview with the alleged man in the suit (aka the star of the film) wasn't a bestseller, why one Earth would a book by Gimlin sell any better?

crowlogic said:
We know the Morris recreation has gloves designed to extend the length of the arm.

We do?
 
As for your comments about Gimlin not cashing in by writing a tell-out book:

Seeing as how Greg Long's book detailing an interview with the alleged man in the suit (aka the star of the film) wasn't a bestseller, why one Earth would a book by Gimlin sell any better?

Not to mention that he might be contractually bound to not write such a book as a result of whatever profit-sharing agreement he and Mrs. Patterson came up with when he sued for his share.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom