Correct. Though that reason may be mistaken. How easily our perceptions can be fooled is something that took mankind a long time, and much bitter experience, to understand. The majority of people still don't realise how unreliable their perceptions and intuition can be.
Except the vast majority of non fraudulant Paranormal Phenonoma cannot be eliminated in that way. In my personal experiance, illusary paranormal phenonoma can easily be established by a closer examination.
I have mistaken paranormal entities for normal objects. Under closer examination the normal objects turned out to be paranormal. Explain that? How do you mistake a paranormal object for a normal one unless it is real?
Incorrect. Irrational beliefs have always been widespread, and even today they are very common. Except in a handful of places (like this forum) it's sceptics who are most likely to be attacked and mocked. There have been many threads here by sceptics bemoaning the reaction of family and friends when they dare to question some of the woo they believe in.
Half-True. It all depends upon the social status possessed by the irrationality in question. Generally other than a few socially sanctioned 'woo' beliefs, everything else is generally persecuted to various levels. Generally the dominant irrationality persecutes the less dominant ones.
But most supposed supernatural/paranormal phenomena are not counter-intuitive - at least to those with little or no understanding of the methodology and discoveries of science. And it was a difficult and hard-learned lesson that the evidence most people consider enough to establish something - subjective, anecdotal evidence - can in fact be highly unreliable.
Not really. In most cases, unless there is some deliberate illusion going on by a third party, a mental illness or the object question has not been clearly examined in focused vision, HONEST subjective anecdotal evidence ought to be reliable.
Unless as whatever it was was clearly percieved (the main problem) there exists no rational grounds for disbelieving in paranormal phenonoma.
As for you counter-intuitive claim, I am unsure. The question whether a basic knowledge of the laws of nature is established in all people's or whether it is a learnt trait. If the latter, it rather suggests that actually 'Science' is nothing but an arbitery construct imposed upon a fundermentally more chaotic reality.
Agreed. But "it breaks the laws of nature" is an indication that you need to carefully check your findings and eliminate alternative explanations, as our understanding of those laws is the result of centuries of careful investigation and has produced many useful discoveries and inventions (unlike our investigations of the supposedly paranormal).
[/QUOTE]
There are always alternative explanations Pixel42. However implausable you can always come up with them.
You have to eliminate all likely alternative explanations only. For instance the possibility of mis-identifying another object as paranormal. However as above mentioned, I have mistaken paranormal objects for normal objects. It works both ways and would go a long way to explaining why some people see nothing paranormal.
The claim that the laws of nature incorperate all reality is merely a belief. As I see it, the common need to eliminate paranormal phenonoma on any basis you can come up with is as I see it is simply a neccesity to confirm this false belief.
There are laws. And some rare beings can eat the laws for breakfast on toast.
We have observed the laws existance. And we have observed the laws being broken. The rational conclusion is really that the laws can be broken by some beings.
