NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

[BCR]

Thought I'd stop by and see if after 53 pages there was an actual document yet. Did I miss it somewhere? Was UAL93 shot down by a super-duper stealthy plane using super-nano-thermite missiles?

 

[Gavron]

Nope. Nothing new. Actually the replies by U1 are exactly the same as replies dated 2007 or older.

Obviously he hasnt found anything new.

Check back again in a few years.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

We're not falling for your obvious attempt to have the last word.

Ninja's are silent. It's not words they deliver.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Thought I'd stop by and see if after 53 pages there was an actual document yet. Did I miss it somewhere? Was UAL93 shot down by a super-duper stealthy plane using super-nano-thermite missiles?

No, but I think I've read more about classified clearances than I ever wanted to know.

----

You know, folks, there is an positive to this thread: New folks don't have to read the massive middle so as to guarantee they don't miss anything important. All they need are the first few pages and whatever the last one is, and they'll see 1. How Ultima posts, 2. That he's got nothing, and 3. All the relevant information they need to get the gist of the thread. It ends up being a great lesson in truther obsession combined with conspiratorially addicted lunacy for them.

 

[Hokulele]

No, but I think I've read more about classified clearances than I ever wanted to know.

----

You know, folks, there is an positive to this thread: New folks don't have to read the massive middle so as to guarantee they don't miss anything important. All they need are the first few pages and whatever the last one is, and they'll see 1. How Ultima posts, 2. That he's got nothing, and 3. All the relevant information they need to get the gist of the thread. It ends up being a great lesson in truther obsession combined with conspiratorially addicted lunacy for them.

I would go further and suggest that new folks don't have to read this thread. Period.

 

[TJM]

I would go further and suggest that new folks don't have to read this thread. Period.

And if they really must read anything, they should be advised that reading beyond post #2 isn't necessary because WildCat nailed it.

Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted.

This contridicts the official story that no planes were near Flight 93.

http://i114.photobucket.com/albums/n268/phixer6/911/FLI93-2.jpg?t=1222974166

Uh, no it doesn't...

/THREAD.

 

[desertgal]

Thought I'd stop by and see if after 53 pages there was an actual document yet. Did I miss it somewhere? Was UAL93 shot down by a super-duper stealthy plane using super-nano-thermite missiles?

If it was, then I'd have to ask what is the point of making an operation super duper stealthy if the NSA is going to keep a record of it? Kinda defeats the purpose.

 

[nicepants]

No i made a statement about what the internet states is in the Critic, nowhere have i discussed the contents of the actual critic.

See quote below:

The actual Critic does not contain word for word whats the internet states.

Key words bolded for you.

 

[Dog Town]

For the love O' Pete, people, let this thread DIE!

 

[Metullus]

Like, now?

Just let it die? Right now?

 

[JimBenArm]

(You know, if you keep posting in it, it never dies)

 

[Metullus]

It doesn't?

 

[Mince]

(You know, if you keep posting in it, it never dies)

I don't get it. What do you mean?

 

[JimBenArm]

I don't get it. What do you mean?

It means if you keep sticking a post in it, it revives it. The heart starts beating again, it crawls from its musty grave and seeks brain tissue of forumites to survive.
So put the post down, for god's sake. Just put it down, or we'll all die!

 

[TJM]

I don't believe in zombie threads.

 

[Metullus]

I do. I've seen 'em.

Scared my **** plug right out.

 

[ULTIMA1]

I asked if this "internet" copy states what the classified document states.

As stated the internet does not state word for word whats in the Critic.

If it did it would be a security violation since the Critic is classified.

 

[ULTIMA1]

could you give up using the words mature/immature.

Well if people would simply act mature, like admitting when facts are posted then i would not have to use that word.

 

[ULTIMA1]

The NTSB was requested to help with the criminal investigation.

Thanks for admitting the NTSB does assist with criminal investigations.

Please explain how that statement makes investigating crashes caused by a criminal act a requirement?

As stated the NTSB is the only agency with the expertise anda equipment to investigate crashes.

 

[ULTIMA1]

Mods, I would also like to respectfully request that this thread be closed unless and until U1 and 16.5 receive the contents of their respective FOIA requests.

Why is everyone so afraid to talk about the NSA Critic?

Are you guys really that afraid of the truth?