Who cares? That has nothing to do with the point I was making to KK. Nice evasion of the problem with your holy book.
ETA: DOC's latest posts in this thread demonstrate one of the fundamental problems with the way he thinks. Apparently if any part of a book/hypothesis is false, you can simply throw away the entire thing. If Ehrman gets one thing wrong (and I have never argued for Ehrman's inerrancy), DOC feels justified in ignoring everything the man has written. This is most likely why he is so defensive over the the concept that the bible has errors, because he apparently believes that if any one part of the bible is wrong/false, he has to throw everything in it away. That also seems to account for why DOC cannot grasp many basic scientific theories. Sad, really.