Roger.
?
1. You claimed to have read the classified version of the critic. Yes or no?
2. You claimed that this critic states that flight 93 was shot down. Yes or no?
(we have to take baby steps)
Kind of the same thing I asked in #1619. Irregardless of bone fides, U1 has claimed to have seen an actual document for which a FOIA request has been made. So it should not be too much of a risk or problem for U1 to stipulate whether the CRITIC was about an intercept and shootdown of flight 93 or was about an intercept of an airliner or something (but no shootdown).
I also pointed out that if the two proposals did not reasonably describe the CRITIC then I invited U1 to make a third proposal realizing that by doing so he would be stipulating that the "new" proposition as reasonably representing the CRITIC.
Gee did this thread "progress" that many pages since I posted 1619?? wow.
