• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pro Uri Gellar article with crazy innuendos regarding James Randi

The Professor said:
These tapes came out in another legal case I believe. They seem to be a matter of public record I would guess.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily. If the court sealed the record, then they wouldn't be. If you don't know, then you shouldn't say.

I've heard that the police that were supposedly involved have died.
Click to expand...

So? Their reports would still be in the case file.

The Professor said:
If so .... Why haven't they been asked about this?
Click to expand...

You know that they haven't been?
 
desertgal said:
Not necessarily. If the court sealed the record, then they wouldn't be. If you don't know, then you shouldn't say.



So? Their reports would still be in the case file.



You know that they haven't been?
Click to expand...

So it would be a simple matter for James Randi to just produce the documents and put an end to all of this right then?

Or possibly a pay check to himself from the police department or the phone company?
 
Last edited:
The Professor said:
So it would be a simple matter for James Randi to just produce the documents and put an end to all of this right then?
Click to expand...

Why should he? It's up to the person accusing him to present proof to back up the accusation - not James Randi to refute it.

It's called "burden of proof", Professor.
 
kerikiwi said:
Can you be specific as to which 'guys' you are referring to?
Give an example of 'too emotional', 'personal loyalty' and 'partiality'?
Click to expand...

I think he's referring to the posters who don't usually post libels against any-one on the Net.
'Too emotional' may mean he doesn't like being confronted with the statement that he's libelled some-one.
 
desertgal said:
Why should he? It's up to the person accusing him to present proof to back up the accusation - not James Randi to refute it.

It's called "burden of proof", Professor.
Click to expand...

The tapes are the proof. Randi has to show that the tapes are something other than what they appear to be.
 
Why, oh, why is This clown Gellar still around? Why doesnt he simply dissapear off the face of the earth? He does nothing but scam people and take their money.
 
The Professor said:
The tapes are the proof. Randi has to show that the tapes are something other than what they appear to be.
Click to expand...

First of all, it's one tape, not tapes. And, no. Randi doesn't have to show anything. He didn't accuse himself of being a pederast.

Do you not understand "burden of proof"? :confused:
 
makaya325 said:
Why, oh, why is This clown Gellar still around? Why doesnt he simply dissapear off the face of the earth? He does nothing but scam people and take their money.
Click to expand...

Interesting interview in Genii(magicians mag) where he attempts to distance himself from his original claims.
 
Azrael 5 said:
Interesting interview in Genii(magicians mag) where he attempts to distance himself from his original claims.
Click to expand...

It doesnt matter. He CLAIMED to have psychic powers. It doesnt matter if he is doubtful now. He needs to face the music regarding his Bull **** claims.
 
desertgal said:
First of all, it's one tape, not tapes. And, no. Randi doesn't have to show anything. He didn't accuse himself of being a pederast.

Do you not understand "burden of proof"? :confused:
Click to expand...

No one needs to go to court to listen to the recordings and make up their own minds. Have you heard them?

It's obvious what is said.

It seems obvious what is going on.

If Randi says that it's something else, I'm more than willing to view his defense.

If he was working for the police or the phone company, then it would be easy to prove that.

That's all I'm saying. It should be easy to shut down all of this stuff.
 
ahhh professor... so someone has you actual EMAIL?

post some more dude!

OK with all the enemies James Randi has made over the years...trust me... if THEY are satisfied then you should be. But what the heck, go ahead join in with your little bit. If you have the lawyer fees once you get in over your head why not take up this new if expensive hobby?
 
and professor all WHAT stuff? A forum internet site?
yeah.. right. OK someone is going to look up stuff about you and post it on some internet forum site you don't read because frankly you have more important things to do, and you go spend time defending yourself... or maybe get on with your life.

It's been done and is over with, and I"m sorry if whomever is getting you to post this doesn't like it. If you want to be the fall guy.. hey fine with me.
 
As there are actual recordings of Randi -if they were legit in content-someone would have contacted te police and charges brought. Or at very least an arrest made.

Why doesn't Jim Callahan inform authorities.He has distributed those recordings in the past,and regularly makes reference to the alleged content?
 
The Professor said:
No one needs to go to court to listen to the recordings and make up their own minds.
Click to expand...

I would certainly hope one would listen to the alleged recording before deciding with certainty that Randi is or is not a pederast-or even that it is Randi at all.

Have you heard them?
Click to expand...

No, I haven't heard it. IT, Professor. It's one tape. But, neither have you. I don't know that he isn't a pederast, but I'm not accusing him of being one without a shred of evidence, either.

It's obvious what is said.
Click to expand...

Really? What is said, Professor? Do tell. Dig your hole a little deeper.

It seems obvious what is going on.
Click to expand...

Really? What is going on, Professor? Do tell. Dig your hole a little deeper.

If Randi says that it's something else, I'm more than willing to view his defense.
Click to expand...

Randi DID say it was something else. Let's see that willingness, Professor. Bet it doesn't extend as far as allowing that Randi might be telling the truth.

If he was working for the police or the phone company, then it would be easy to prove that.
Click to expand...

Why should he? HE didn't accuse himself of being a pederast. If it is so easy, then why do his accusers not produce the evidence? They are the ones making the accusation. Surely, they should be able to back it up with something other than innuendo and speculation.

That's all I'm saying. It should be easy to shut down all of this stuff.
Click to expand...

If his accusers are going to dig themselves a libelous hole, why should Randi help them out of it?
 
Last edited:
The Professor said:
The tapes are the proof. Randi has to show that the tapes are something other than what they appear to be.
Click to expand...

No the proof is that, even though Randi has many many idiots who don't like him exposing their fantasies to the light of day and who would just love to destroy his credibility, he has never been charged.
 
The Professor said:
So you guys have never heard the recordings, yet you are experts on what is on them?
Click to expand...

No. But, we're not the ones accusing Randi, or anyone else, of pedophilia.

You haven't heard the recording, either. Doesn't stop you from proclaiming yourself an expert about what is on it. D'ya see your hypocrisy here, Prof?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom