• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
DOC said:
If people keep asking the same question, I've got a right to keep giving the same answer.
Click to expand...


It is still spammity-spam, spam, baked beans, and spam.

And by the way, 2 of the URL's are the first time I posted them.
Click to expand...


One leads back to your original mistake, the other is a link to the same material in the first. In other words, spam, spam lite, and oven roasted turkey spam, eggs, spam, bacon, spam, and spam.
 
joobz said:
That's right. You only admitted that it was an interpolation and that's COMPLETELY different.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Of course, this is also false. I said it might have been an interpolation. The whole Josephus quote might have been true. There is no proof it is a false quote, only opinions that some of it might be an interpolation. A small minority do believe the whole quote is false though. A larger minority believe the whole quote is true. Most believe it is a partial interpolation.
 
Last edited:
DOC said:
Of course, this is also false. I said it might have been an interpolation. The whole Josephus quote might have been true. There is no evidence it is a false quote, only opinions that some of it might be an interpolation. A small minority do believe the whole quote is false though. A larger minority believe the whole quote is true. Most believe it is a partial interpolation.
Click to expand...
In other words, the overwhelming majority of scholars believe that the quote is a forgery.

ETA: I can't help but notice that you again avoided my ON TOPIC question.

It's funny how you drop a subject when you know you can't win and then go back to that topic later as though we never addressed your points.

The latest issue was the inconsistencies in the gospels. It's clear that they can't ALL be right. So regarding the ressurection, if all we have are inconsistent stories written decades apart and later after the fact, How can we know that it even happened?

Fact is, based upon your use of the word evidence, We have more evidence of Elvis being alive in the 90s than we do of the resurrection ever happening.
 
Last edited:
joobz said:
In other words, the overwhelming majority of scholars believe that the quote is a forgery.
Click to expand...

What historians say is an interpolation. And what about the "other" Josephus quote about Jesus. Most historians believe that one is legitimate.
 
Facts:
1.) I met Hokulele IN person.
2.) I won money betting on horses using the numbers 6, 6, 6.
3.) Hokulele has been called evil multiple times.
4.) 6, 6, 6 is the mark of the devil.

All of these points are historically accurate and can be independantly verified.

Conclusion: Hokulele Likes eating saugage.

ETA: I figured we might as well start making other conclusions that don't follow from the evidence provided.
 
Last edited:
DOC said:
What historians say is an interpolation. And what about the "other" Josephus quote about Jesus. Most historians believe that one is legitimate.
Click to expand...
Because it doesn't prove anything other than there was such a thing as christians.

Now, if you'd be so kind...

The latest issue was the inconsistencies in the gospels. It's clear that they can't ALL be right. So regarding the ressurection, if all we have are inconsistent stories written decades apart and later after the fact, How can we know that it even happened?
 
Hokulele said:
FosterZygote's red hair is clearly evidence that horse number 9 was a decent long shot bet. You could almost call its home stretch run sort of a resurrection.
Click to expand...

Verily, the hand of god came down to goose the stallion, and prod the steed.
 
DOC said:
If people keep asking the same question, I've got a right to keep giving the same answer
Click to expand...
Maybe... that's up to the mods to decide



DOC said:
And by the way, 2 of the URL's are the first time I posted them.
Click to expand...
Something you might be interested in, DOC

I have (honestly) grown so weary of what I regard as your incessant spamming and dodging that, until I read they were 'new' I was, going to ignore the URLs completely

In other words, I am sincere when I say you have NO credibility in my eyes

This is your problem
 
six7s said:
In other words, I am sincere when I say you have NO credibility in my eyes
Click to expand...
I am very sincere is stating that he has negative credibility in my eyes. Every lie and nonsense he spouts makes me respect the Christian religion a whole lot less.
 
DOC said:
And by the way, 2 of the URL's are the first time I posted them.
Click to expand...
Two of which URLs?

Not these

DOC said:
Yes, and from Non-Christian sources:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=4633677#post4633677

And regarding the thread's topic there is this:

http://books.google.com/books?id=PC...Geisler+10+reasons&client=firefox-a#PPA275,M1

and if you live outside the US and can't get the previous URL you can view this one:

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?t=51643
Click to expand...
​

Why are you still lying for your messiah, DOC?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom