Truthers say "Barry Jennings may have been murdered!!!"

Galileo said:
Breathing in explosive nano-thermite is not good for your health either.
Click to expand...

Whose undies did you pull that out of?

There is nbo explosive nano-thermite device that could have gone off in WTC 7 and created such a toxic atmosphere.

There was, to read Mr Hess' account, no HE detonation inside WTC 7. Hess describes something more like a wind than a hammer blow.

It was the collapse of one of the towers.
 
leftysergeant said:
Whose undies did you pull that out of?

There is nbo explosive nano-thermite device that could have gone off in WTC 7 and created such a toxic atmosphere.

There was, to read Mr Hess' account, no HE detonation inside WTC 7. Hess describes something more like a wind than a hammer blow.

It was the collapse of one of the towers.
Click to expand...

Mr. Hess' said there was an explosion as well, inside WTC 7, at the same time as Jennings said.
 
Galileo said:
Mr. Hess' said there was an explosion as well, inside WTC 7, at the same time as Jennings said.
Click to expand...
Learn to interpret witness statements, paying attention to both what is described and what is not described.

We know for a fact that while Jennings and Hess were inside WTC 7, WTC 1 and two collapsed. These two events created a massive, sudden rise in air pressure at ground level when the debris hit the ground. That over-pressurization was adequate to pick people up off the ground outside. Inside another building, it would even more greatly over-pressurize such confined spaces as stairwells.

What Hess describves is consistant with a rapid over-pressurization of the stairwell..

Both men desribe experiencing and explosion or over-pressurization of some sort. They do not describe a major, cataclysmic, bloody spectacular-beyond-normal-human-experience event of which they should have been immediately aware when the towers collapsed.

The simplest of logic tells me that the over-pressurization in WTC 7 was from the collapse of nearby structures and the dispalcement of tons of air, rather than by any HE device in WTC 7.
 
leftysergeant said:
Learn to interpret witness statements, paying attention to both what is described and what is not described.

We know for a fact that while Jennings and Hess were inside WTC 7, WTC 1 and two collapsed. These two events created a massive, sudden rise in air pressure at ground level when the debris hit the ground. That over-pressurization was adequate to pick people up off the ground outside. Inside another building, it would even more greatly over-pressurize such confined spaces as stairwells.

What Hess describves is consistant with a rapid over-pressurization of the stairwell..

Both men desribe experiencing and explosion or over-pressurization of some sort. They do not describe a major, cataclysmic, bloody spectacular-beyond-normal-human-experience event of which they should have been immediately aware when the towers collapsed.

The simplest of logic tells me that the over-pressurization in WTC 7 was from the collapse of nearby structures and the dispalcement of tons of air, rather than by any HE device in WTC 7.
Click to expand...

Jennings was on the north NE side of the core, far away from where a small amount of debris hit.

But he was very close to column # 79 and girder # 44.
 
Galileo said:
Jennings was on the north NE side of the core, far away from where a small amount of debris hit.

But he was very close to column # 79 and girder # 44.
Click to expand...

So freaking WHAT?

Do you have a link to his description of what it was like when the towers collapsed?

Are you suggesting that he was standing there when the critical columns were blown with HE? That would be a stupid assumption.
 
Galileo said:
Jennings was on the north NE side of the core, far away from where a small amount of debris hit.

But he was very close to column # 79 and girder # 44.
Click to expand...
You are off topic.

The topic is the idiots of 911Truth say Barry was murdered. What say you?
 
If he was murdered because he knew something damaging to either side of this arguement, it would be more likely that a twoofer did it. He had not provided them with the aid and comfort thwey expected him to give. A careful examination of what he reported reveals not a bloody thing to support da twoof.
 
leftysergeant said:
If he was murdered because he knew something damaging to either side of this arguement, it would be more likely that a twoofer did it. He had not provided them with the aid and comfort thwey expected him to give. A careful examination of what he reported reveals not a bloody thing to support da twoof.
Click to expand...


This would require a truther being both smart enough to get away with murder and having the good sense to not go on youtube to brag about it 15 minutes later.
 
Alt+F4 said:
Originally Posted by Galileo
The PI said the case should be referred to law enforcement.
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean that unnamed PI. I'm not buying any of this for one second.
Click to expand...

No Avery said the PI HAD referred the case to law enforcement. We're supposed to believe that the same PI who the MIBH intimidated so much he gave Avery his money back and told the "filmmaker" to never contact him again still had the guts to denouce the NWO to the cops. Police reports are public records,start digging truthers!
 
It doesn't say what case he referred the cops to, maybe he told them to watch that insane truther Avery?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom