NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Evidence, not evidence
flight 93, not flight 93
shot down, not shot down

Could this thread get any worse? :D
 
Where did I say that there wasn't a heat shield?

At least be mature enought to admit when facts have been posted.

As stated with the extra steel in the engine bat and with the engines that makes the F-4 mostly made of steel.
 
Last edited:
You asked for proof of what i just stated about the heal sheild and i provided prove.


At least be mature enought to admit when facts have been posted.

Liar.

I didn't ask for proof of the heatshield.

I asked for proof of the overall statement that it's mostly made of steel.

So now you need to show proof of all the components and the materials they're made of to prove your point.

You can't.

You're a liar.
 
I never stated Flight 93 was shot down.


YOU ARE A LIAR ROGER!

Ultima1 said:
Do you know what a CRITIC is?

The NSA has one in thier archives that states Flight 93 was shot down.

Your claim is that you indeed READ THIS CRITIC.


If anyone else wants to call the DOD public affairs office to report this clown-

1 (703) 428-0711

Roger Misner
New Oxford, PA
NSA Analyst
 
Last edited:
So now you need to show proof of all the components and the materials they're made of to prove your point.

I have shown the componets many times. It is not my fault that as usual people like you are very immature and can not except the facts and evidence shown.
 
YOU ARE A LIAR ROGER!
Your claim is that you indeed READ THIS CRITIC.

If you were mature enough to read the whole post you would understand that it is the internet version of whats in the NSA critic.

As stated i have not verified it with the actual critic becuase i have not recived it or the follow up reports.

Why cant you believers grow up.
 
Last edited:
Could you be any immature about not reading whole post or looking at the material posted?

I have read the posts, and they all show that you are lying.

You change your story minute to minute.

The posts in this thread alone show that.

An adult would recognize that.
 
No i have not been caught lying (you have been caught not knowing anythign about what happened on 9/11).

If you read the internet version of the whats in the NSA critic it states that Flight 93 was intercepted. Thats the version i ahve to go by since i cannot state exactly whats in the actual NSA critic until the unclassified version has been released.

I am sure you could find an internet version for any senario you want. The problem is with credibility. There is no reason to trust the veracity of the claims made until we can actually see the docuement in question.

What else do you believe solely on the basis of being told it by an anonymous poster on the internet?
 
No. i went into the agency in 1998, after being on the police force for 12 years to become an analyst.
You are the worse analyst in the world.
Proof is your changing story. Then.
Here is a letter from the NSA FOIA office that they have the NSA "Critic" that i asked for that states that Flight 93 was intercepted. ...

Now.
yes i have read the document

I never stated the plane was shot down, i stated it may have been shot down. The document clearly shows a plane was intercepted.
...
Proof complete, the worse analyst in the NSA. But you are a gate guard laughing with your coworkers who think you are nuts. You should ask them to tell you the truth.

Gee its going to be so fun when i show the documents and materials i get from my FOIA request. I mean me and coworkers already have such a good laugh about you guys.

Its going to show how really immature you guys are for living in a media fed fantasy world and not accepting real evidence.
Only a gate guard would laugh at us since you would be fired as an NSA analyst after making all these posts on the Internet. Proof you are not an analyst; you are laughing with your coworkers about your dirt dumb ideas and how they failed.
 
Last edited:
Roger,

your claim in September and a few days ago, was that you had access to the CLASSIFIED version of the critic. In September you stated:

"Do you know what a CRITIC is? The NSA has one in thier archives that states Flight 93 was shot down." - Roger Misner

Now you are backing off that. Not that it matters. If you are who you claim to be, you will be losing your alleged Top Secret clearance soon.
 
FOR ALL YOU BELIEVERS THAT THINK I AM LYING PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE INTERNET VERSION OF WHATS IN THE NSA CRITIC DOES IN FACT STATE FLIGHT 93 WAS INTERCEPTED AND SHOT DOWN.

(HOW EVER AS I HAVE STATED MANY TIMES THIS IS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITH THE ACTUAL NSA DOCUMENT SENCE IT IS CLASSIFIED AND I AM WAITING ON THE UNCLASSIFIED VERSION)


http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3568.shtml
United 93 shoot down reference again appears in news

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/42103?l=1
October 29, 2007 -- SPECIAL REPORT -- United Flight 93 shot down by Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews
According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as "CRITICs."
 
Last edited:
I have shown the componets many times. It is not my fault that as usual people like you are very immature and can not except the facts and evidence shown.

Liar.

You have shown a few links to a few components on an F-4 being made of steel, which isn't in question.

You haven't put it all together yet, giving weights of all the materials used. You need to do that.

You can't.

You're a liar.
 
FOR ALL YOU BELIEVERS THAT THINK I AM LYING PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING AND YOU WILL SEE THAT THE INTERNET VERSION OF WHATS IN THE NSA CRITIC DOES IN FACT STATE FLIGHT 93 WAS INTERCEPTED AND SHOT DOWN.

(HOW EVER AS I HAVE STATED MANY TIMES THIS IS NOT BEEN VERIFIED WITH THE ACTUAL NSA DOCUMENT SENCE IT IS CLASSIFIED AND I AM WAITING ON THE UNCLASSIFIED VERSION)


http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3568.shtml
United 93 shoot down reference again appears in news

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/message/42103?l=1
October 29, 2007 -- SPECIAL REPORT -- United Flight 93 shot down by Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews
According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as "CRITICs."

Wayne Madsen's paranoid ramblings again? This is not evidence!
 
No i have not been caught lying (you have been caught not knowing anythign about what happened on 9/11).

If you read the internet version of the whats in the NSA critic it states that Flight 93 was intercepted. Thats the version i ahve to go by since i cannot state exactly whats in the actual NSA critic until the unclassified version has been released.

Extra dumb pure garbage!

You can't tell people the internet version is like the version you saw at the NSA, it is against the law. You would be fired.

Thus, are not an NSA analyst because you can't post this tripe on the Internet and be an analyst without being fired.

As a gate guard are saying since you can't tell us what the real message really says but it does say an aircraft was intercepted your previous bs junk about 93 being intercepted will not be in the real critic; as you back in your new goalpost position with dumb poppycock.

I think there is enough on the Internet now to fire you as a gate guard at the NSA; Has the FBI guys called you yet?



... and going off thread.
try off topic Mr analyst.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it time to end the charade ULTIMA1? You're now a proven liar. You're best strategy here would be to fess up and admit you're nothing more than an internet troll. Not that you'd gain any credibility in my eyes, but you yourself might feel better.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom