NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sabrina said:
Not if he wants to keep his clearance, parky. No offense or anything, but if the information is classified, he can't say a thing, whether you're a friend of his or not, UNLESS you met some very specific criteria, and from what I've seen on here (please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong however) you don't meet the criteria. That's how a security clearance and classified information is SUPPOSED to work, a fact that Ultima doesn't seem to get no matter how it's explained to him.
Click to expand...

I had a "secret" clearance with the U.S. Navy. When I was given the clearance, I was briefed that I wasn't supposed to tell others outside my squadron that I even had a clearance. That ULTIMA1 is on an internet message board talking about his NSA clearance is very dubious.
 
Mince said:
I had a "secret" clearance with the U.S. Navy. When I was given the clearance, I was briefed that I wasn't supposed to tell others outside my squadron that I even had a clearance. That ULTIMA1 is on an internet message board talking about his NSA clearance is very dubious.
Click to expand...

I have never had secret clearance but I worked at a military installation that did classified research. I was a friend of one of those workers and I once asked him what he did. "I type" was his answer. "Type what?" I asked innocently. No reply. Thinking he had not heard me I asked again. No reply again , only a blank look right at me and I fiannly got it. "I type" was as much as he could say. He would not lie to me or even state that he could say no more, he simply did not say more.

A far cry from what U1 is doing here.
 
250px-Griefer.png


O RLY?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
How many times must i keep repeating things becasue you seem not to understanda a basic sentence? Let me bold it so it might make more sense and be easier for you to read again.

I NEVER STATED THE DOCUMENT WAS SHOWN ON THE INTERNET, ...
Click to expand...


Oh really (bolding mine)?

ULTIMA1 said:
Gee more proof that people on here cannot read. The contents of the document has been shown on the internet.

So i am still waiting for an explanation of how this is a securuty breach.
Click to expand...


Do you see the quote above being posted by Ultima1? Do you see the part that says, "The contents of the document has been shown on the internet"? We both see the word "contents" right?

Holy crap.

:boggled:
 
Well if I say "aliens have landed here on earth", and there is a classified document, that confirms there are aliens on earth, do you not see how releasing the exact contents of the document, with names, locations, etc, might still be a security breach? The contents of the document (that aliens have in fact landed on earth) is available at many sites online, but still...

Unless you are saying that the EXACT word for word contents of the document have been available online? Is that what you are saying?????

TAM:)
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Yes thats right, i have stated that and stand by it.

Will will have to wait for the document to come out to see if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989 that was confused for Flight 93.

Either way the document still contridicts the official story. Just 1 more peice of evidnece that shows reasonable doubt in the official story
Click to expand...


Wait a minute. You mean you don't know if it was Flight 93 or Flight 1989? If you read the classified document as you have stated, why would you need to wait to get the document and see what it says when you have already read the classified version? Another lie?

:confused:
 
So U1 read the classified doc and came away not knowing if it was flt 93 or 1989 that was intercepted but he wants us to wait until the doc comes out via the FOIA request so that we can see if it was F93 or F1989.

OR

The doc does state that an intercept mission was instituted and U1 assumes that it was successful BUT for some unknown reason the doc does not bother stating which civilian flight was intercepted.


Either way it makes U1 a loon.
 
Does this thread remind any one else but me of the years of hype surrounding the release of Axle Rose's (I refuse to call this band Guns 'N Roses) Chinese Democracy?
 
HawksFan said:
Does this thread remind any one else but me of the years of hype surrounding the release of Axle Rose's (I refuse to call this band Guns 'N Roses) Chinese Democracy?
Click to expand...

I'm a 50+ old codger (just ask Balsamo) so I cannot say it reminds me of that.

It does remind me of Lyte Trip's hyping his up coming release of sooper-dooper, 'blow the lid off, stupendious, 'smoking gun' evidence of a conspiracy surrounding the attack on the Pentagon. The main difference is that U1 can't know what the doc actually does say but he still continues to convince himself that he does. Lyte knew what his video would contain , he just convinvced himself that it meant what he wanted it to.
 
Darn, I can't believe you guys are still debating a document that does not exist yet.
 
Can we at least agree that not only is the document not "comming soon", it's not even breathing hard yet?
 
911files said:
Darn, I can't believe you guys are still debating a document that does not exist yet.
Click to expand...



But I think we've done something no other U1 discussion has done, which is to show that he is lying, based entirely on his own posts. Up until now, we were just speculating that he was lying.


So, where ever he shows up next, we can just post a link to the posts here that demonstrate his lies beyond question, and thus save everyone else the headaches.
 
Quad4_72 said:
Sorry Ultima. I choose not to act like a little immature 15 year old. I simply call people out when I can tell they are lying. YOU Ultima, are lying.

Now, answer the second part of my post where i asked you to identify which part of your posted article disagrees with NIST's findings.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Well its the only way i have found that people will face reallity.
Click to expand...

Pretty much says it all.:cool:
 
TjW said:
Can we at least agree that not only is the document not "comming soon", it's not even breathing hard yet?
Click to expand...

Nominated for the Clean but still Very Naughty Award!

If those foot draggers knew how many posts we've devoted to this thing, I'm sure they'd bump it up the pile.

Last I heard it was being reviewed by the NWO Department of expended air to air missiles for a performance review.... but perhaps I've said too much.
 
16.5 said:
Last I heard it was being reviewed by the NWO Department of expended air to air missiles for a performance review.... but perhaps I've said too much.
Click to expand...

Yes you have. Could you please step into my office for a......discussion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom