What was the point of blowing up WTC7

[dtugg]

Self-pwnage much?

You claimed none doubt the official story. A website where they say the opposite has been created. I didn't create it. Firefighters did.

Go cry in your beer with your backslapping buds.

You are the worst troll ever.

 

[KreeL]

I simply answer questions. The question asked by this thread I have answered.

Non-toofers are in denial of all real eyewitness and physical evidence concerning 9/11. You can show them - they can't see. You can provide written testimonies - they can't read. You can show science - they can't understand.

Nothing new for you here. You can take your toys and go home now.

 

[A W Smith]

Enough firefighters searching for answers joined together to form firefightersfor911truth.com that you should see what they have to say. That is... if you really care to find out.

I see No FDNY members on your flaky little firebugsfor911truth petition there Kreel troll. Why is that? Why don't you take your little petition and go to these locations to get it signed?


http://www.nycfire.net/mnfiremap

 

[The Platypus]

I simply answer questions. The question asked by this thread I have answered.

Non-toofers are in denial of all real eyewitness and physical evidence concerning 9/11. You can show them - they can't see. You can provide written testimonies - they can't read. You can show science - they can't understand.

Nothing new for you here. You can take your toys and go home now.

It's captain ironic!

 

[johnny karate]

You claimed none doubt the official story.

Thats actually not what I said. But hey, don't let a little thing like facts get in the way of your delusions.

A website where they say the opposite has been created. I didn't create it. Firefighters did.

Ahem...

That website is a joke. Please provide the name of one FDNY firefighter who is a verified member.

Paying attention clearly isn't your strong suit.

No one in the FDNY has expressed a belief that WTC7 was a controlled demolition, despite the fact that many of them witnessed its collpase firsthand. Your intellectually dishonest shenanigans do nothing to change that.

You lose.

 

[9/11-investigator]

I simply answer questions. The question asked by this thread I have answered.

Non-toofers are in denial of all real eyewitness and physical evidence concerning 9/11. You can show them - they can't see. You can provide written testimonies - they can't read. You can show science - they can't understand.

Nothing new for you here. You can take your toys and go home now.

On this forum there is no real difference perceived between a truther and a troll, is there.

Wasn't it dtugg himself who started this thread asking:

"Has any twoofer ever given any reason that makes even a modicum of sense as to why the NWO blew up WTC7? Any twoofer that still posts here want to take a stab at it? Keep in mind that I am not interested in how you "know" it was a controlled demolition, I want know why they did it."

So he shouldn't be surprised when he gets an answer.

P.S. did you pack your suntan oil, dtugg?

 

[dtugg]

Nazi, I was asking for a rational explanation. No twoofer has provided one yet.

I don't need suntan lotion. And do I have to go through with your Nazi fantasy of sending teh joooz to Madagaskar even through I am not a jooo?

 

[Baylor]

On this forum there is no real difference perceived between a truther and a troll, is there.

Wasn't it dtugg himself who started this thread asking:

"Has any twoofer ever given any reason that makes even a modicum of sense as to why the NWO blew up WTC7? Any twoofer that still posts here want to take a stab at it? Keep in mind that I am not interested in how you "know" it was a controlled demolition, I want know why they did it."

So he shouldn't be surprised when he gets an answer.

P.S. did you pack your suntan oil, dtugg?

What answer? You mean this "answer".

Speculation: there was a plane destined to remote control crash into WTC7 as well but that something went wrong with the remote control. And there was WTC7, stuffed with explosives for the whole world to see.

Can't have that, therefore push the button anyway and invent 'we decided to pull' and 'thermal expansion' afterwards.

That was more of a schizophrenia symptom than it was an answer.

 

[KreeL]

Nazi, I was asking for a rational explanation. No twoofer has provided one yet.

I don't need suntan lotion. And do I have to go through with your Nazi fantasy of sending teh joooz to Madagaskar even through I am not a jooo?

You weren't asking for an explanation? My answer wasn't good enough for you? So what's your explanation? What talking points were given to you by NIST? Fire? NIST admitted they didn't even check the debris for arson because they ignored over 100 eyewitnesses and audio concerning EXPLOSIONS! Why?

How convenient for you! You are on the same side as the cover-up - feel better now?

 

[dtugg]

You weren't asking for an explanation? My answer wasn't good enough for you? So what's your explanation? What talking points were given to you by NIST? Fire? NIST admitted they didn't even check the debris for arson because they ignored over 100 eyewitnesses and audio concerning EXPLOSIONS! Why?

How convenient for you! You are on the same side as the cover-up - feel better now?

My explanation is that you're a disinfo agent because I am not sure if it is possible for somebody to be as dumb as you pretend to be.

 

[KreeL]

That's not an explanation. THAT'S a LAME excuse.

Try again. This time with feeling.

 

[jaydeehess]

Is this your 'explanation' as to why WTC 7 was supposedly brought down?

If you were a military man planning the WTC destruction for 9/11, and you wanted to conceal the obvious (see Randi about illusions), how would your plan look when you were finished? The entire WTC is your playground, and one of your prerequisites is BIG SHOW. You know, shock and awe.

Now, a production this big would require backup plans in case of certain failures. Most military planners will attest to that.

After you place yourself in that mindset...what was plan A, plan B, plan C?

To catch criminals, you must think like one.

If so then it amounts to "because they could" and as such fits well into a circular arguement in which WTC 7 was a CD because WTC 1 & 2 were and WTC 1 & 2 were and part of the proof of it is that WTC 7 was.

We are told after all, that WTC 7 is the 'smoking gun' most compelling case for CD and now you are stating that WTC 1 & 2 were brought down for shock and awe and to cap it off they decided to also bring down one other adjacent building, WTC 7.

So how about the rest of the WTC complex. All CD's or were 1,2 and 7 special?

 

[Grizzly Bear]

After you place yourself in that mindset...what was plan A, plan B, plan C?

To catch criminals, you must think like one.

They must be bad at what they do... Clearly they felt so comfortable with their plans that they just decided to demolish another building just for the hell of it... Well then again it is individuals such as yourself that contend this whole operation was done with military precision yet their entire plan in unraveled in the time it takes to write a single post on an internet forum... heh

 

[Vic73]

Has any twoofer ever given any reason that makes even a modicum of sense as to why the NWO blew up WTC7? Any twoofer that still posts here want to take a stab at it? Keep in mind that I am not interested in how you "know" it was a controlled demolition, I want know why they did it.

I'd also like the twoofers to explain why, if it was an inside job, the government would warn the firefighters about the collapse of WTC 7 but not the twin towers?

 

[Dog Town]

I'd also like the twoofers to explain why, if it was an inside job, the government would warn the firefighters about the collapse of WTC 7 but not the twin towers?

First off, in twoofer world,( known as Wooville) the FDNY "pulled" 7. Yeah, good luck trying to make sense of that!

 

[Thunder]

I'd also like the twoofers to explain why, if it was an inside job, the government would warn the firefighters about the collapse of WTC 7 but not the twin towers?

The NWO felt bad for the 250+ dead FDNY in the towers, and decided to prevent any further loss of life.

 

[Grimstad]

Flight 77 was aiming at the largest office building, and you think WTC7 was target but loaded with silent explosives that leave no trace of blasts.

How do you make up such stupid ideas? What evidence do you use to make failed ideas on 911?

Fact is anyone can wreck a plane into a building or crash on the runway. Not crashing is a skill pilots strive for, so your cinch is stupid about pilot on 77 being good, he was bad, and if he had not had one of the largest targets to hit in the world he would have failed like his murdering buddies on flight 93. The terrorists only had to be just a slightly better than the believers of 911Truth.

LOL. Yes. Flying is the second most thrilling thing a man can do. Landing is the first.

 

[BigAl]

A few days ago I believe I heard DRG saying that the first explosions in WTC7 took place before the first tower fell.

Did he says "first tower" or "tower 1"? They are not the same thing.
If he said "Tower 1", he was right but misleading.

The first tower to fall was the South tower and lots of people were in the North Tower or in WTC7 and didn't know what they heard and felt was the collapse of the south tower. Lots of people used "explosion" to describe what they experience. That is the source of most of the cherry-picked quotes from firemen, the didn't know what happened.

"explosion" is just a word for "loud noise".

 

[BigAl]

You weren't asking for an explanation? My answer wasn't good enough for you? So what's your explanation? What talking points were given to you by NIST? Fire? NIST admitted they didn't even check the debris for arson because they ignored over 100 eyewitnesses and audio concerning EXPLOSIONS! Why?

How convenient for you! You are on the same side as the cover-up - feel better now?

The is no audio showing man-made explosions at WTC. If you cite sources, I'd like to see them. If there was, it would be on page 1 of every Twoofer web page made over the past 7 years and I would have to ask what yo are speaking of.

There are two YouTube movies that what is clearly fake explosions. "9/11 Mysteries is one of them. The name of the other is in my notes.