Question for truthers: what should a new investigation look like?

uk_dave said:
Yeah, but ace wants to stop paying tax. That's an aim I'm sure he's willing to fight for.

Gotta get our priorities right, dontcha know?
Click to expand...


Meh. He can stop paying taxes any time he wants. What he actually wants is to not pay taxes without the fear of punishment.

nicepants said:
Absent a bartender giving me catastrophically-strong drinks, the process of me getting drunk on woo woos is likely to be a long one.
Click to expand...


I don't know. The oxygen-starving effects of Truther Brew on the brain can be pretty devastating...
 
So far Malcolm, Ace, and Mjd haven't come up with any names for a new investigation. They go over these elaborate theories endlessly, and yet, calling for a new investigation, never devote any of their time to this critical detail.
Instead, they spend their time attempting to convince people of debunked conspiracies. Goes to show where the priorities are.
 
I know, lets get Hillary Clinton and John Edwards to head up the investigation, because we know they would never CONSPIRE to do undermine anything or anyone, noww would they...Just ask Dennis Kucinich, he'll tell ya...lol

TAM:)
 
It would be pretty interesting if guys like Alex Jones were in office, then they could get a taste of cult groups accusing them of conspiracies and what not.
 
at around 06:53
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xkYLtNH1zg
"I think we do need somekind of international domestic independent citizen investigation, but... right now...I don't know... It's a very good question but we need to have citizens ask questions right now and then hopefully we'll have some sort of entity take it from there..."
Click to expand...

Yeah, that'll work. Good thinking Matt... :rolleyes:
 
T.A.M. said:
I know, lets get Hillary Clinton and John Edwards to head up the investigation, because we know they would never CONSPIRE to do undermine anything or anyone, noww would they...Just ask Dennis Kucinich, he'll tell ya...lol

TAM:)
Click to expand...

:D

Or perhaps they believe parading around in those "investigate 9/11" T-shirts will cause a "catalyzing" event of opportunity for them.
Remember when the New Orleans Saints made the playoffs in 2000? They made these banners that read; "Who Dat Say Dey Gonna Beat Dem Saints?" or something very similar to that. I'm thinking there should be one for the debunkers that reads; "Who's Dat Dey Gonna Get To Investigate"? :p
 
mjd1982 said:
You didnt read the posts. Read them again. Transparaency and accountability is what is necessary- this can be achieved with members of the government. It would exclude the likes of Zelikow, Kean and (prior) Kissinger, from any involvement.

This should be quite easy to understand.
Click to expand...

What part of the official investigation was not "transparent" enough?

And for accountability, who do you presume the investigators be "accountable" to? Alex Jones?
 
Given that any new 9/11 enquiry granted by this or any other adminiistration will be a fix we have to take another approach.

The 9/11 argument has been adversarial from day one so let us conclude it in the same way.

The American way- In court.

First we set up two investigative panels . One composed of Truth advocates and one of government supporters. Both having full powers of subpoena. The Truth panel could be led by David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones , Kevin Ryan, Bob Bowman and their choice of other members up to say 15 or so. The governement panel could be composed of whoever they liked....I would suggest the original 9/11 commission members myself.

Then they could could start their seperate gathering of data, calling witnesses under subpoena and accessing documentation and material evidence the same way. Gagged witnesses would be ungagged at will.

The two teams of lawyers wold be fully abreast of all developements and could soon move into the familiar court setting. Here all witnesses would be heard in public- in fact everything should go out on live National TV for the duration of the case. No closed sittings.

There should be several people with camcorders following events and posting videos daily on the internet.

In this way a fair investigation is guaranteed.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Given that any new 9/11 enquiry granted by this or any other adminiistration will be a fix we have to take another approach.

The 9/11 argument has been adversarial from day one so let us conclude it in the same way.

The American way- In court.

First we set up two investigative panels . One composed of Truth advocates and one of government supporters. Both having full powers of subpoena. The Truth panel could be led by David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones , Kevin Ryan, Bob Bowman and their choice of other members up to say 15 or so. The governement panel could be composed of whoever they liked....I would suggest the original 9/11 commission members myself.

Then they could could start their seperate gathering of data, calling witnesses under subpoena and accessing documentation and material evidence the same way. Gagged witnesses would be ungagged at will.

The two teams of lawyers wold be fully abreast of all developements and could soon move into the familiar court setting. Here all witnesses would be heard in public- in fact everything should go out on live National TV for the duration of the case. No closed sittings.

There should be several people with camcorders following events and posting videos daily on the internet.

In this way a fair investigation is guaranteed.
Click to expand...


I'm fine with this as long as Griffin, Jones, Ryan, Bowman, et al pay for it out of their own pockets.
 
Bill- would you accept the findings if it said that 9-11 was not an inside job?

id be willing to pay for another investigation if truthers swore to God to shet up after it was finished.
 
Last edited:
Am I to assume that this court trial will be presided over by a Federal judge and will be decided by a 12-man citizen jury?
 
parky76 said:
Bill- would you accept the findings if it said that 9-11 was not an inside job?

id be willing to pay for another investigation if truthers swore to God to shet up after it was finished.
Click to expand...

I would have to. As long as it remained uncorrupted and the government won by force of argument and evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom