NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ultima1, parked in his beliefs and waiting to be validated.

Horatius said:
He's already missed it:

Of course, Friday this week is Good Friday. Can anyone tell me if US Federal employees have that as a day off? Here in Canada we do (Four day weekend! WooT!)
Click to expand...

well ultima has to work as the parking decks still open. That is unless they just open the gates and let everyone park for free.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
When did i say that it was hit by a missile?

Please show me where i stated it was hit by a misisle or admit you are very wrong or very confused.
Click to expand...

Here's the site you posted at:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread379365/pg1

Here's your quote from that site at the beginning of the thread:
ULTIMA1 said:
Here is some evidnece from the NSA archives that Flight 93 was shot down.
Click to expand...


Your quote is then followed by this article which you posted (bolding mine):
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/printer_3568.shtml said:
On October 29, 2007, WMR reported: “According to U.S. intelligence sources, the archives of the National Security Agency (NSA), available to cleared users via the INTELINK network, contains an archive of Flash precedence and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) NSA intelligence messages known as ‘CRITICs.’

One such CRITIC from September 11, 2001, which includes a number of follow-on intelligence reports, concerns United Airlines flight 93, downed over Shanksville, Pennsylvania. However, the CRITIC is at odds with the official account of the fate of United 93, which is that passengers and crew attacked the hijackers and forced the plane to crash into the ground.

The NSA CRITIC, according to sources who have seen it, is about five or six sentences, and paraphrasically states:

“Two F-16s scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base at [likely 1336 Zulu]. Civilian airline hijacked. Over state of Pennsylvania civilian airliner was ‘intercepted’ at (Latitude and Longitude of intercept].”

Several follow-up CRITICs are appended to the first United 93-related CRITIC. One follow-up CRITIC mentioned a possible fifth hijacked plane flying south from Canada that was near the Canadian-U.S. border. Another CRITIC states the plane ‘intercepted’ over Pennsylvania was ‘confirmed civilian.’

On April 16, 2008, WMR reported: “WMR has received another confirmation, bringing the total number to three, that United Flight 93, hijacked on the morning of September 11, 2001, was shot down over rural Pennsylvania by U.S. Air Force jets scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland. There are also reports that one F-16 scrambled from Langley Air Force Base in Virginia returned to base minus one air-to-air missile but the National Security Agency CRITIC report specified the interceptors that downed United 93 took off from Andrews.

“The third confirmation, as were the first two, is from a National Security Agency (NSA) source. In fact, a number of personnel who were on watch at the Meade Operations Center (MOC), which is a floor below the NSA’s National Security Operations Center (NSOC), were aware that United 93 was brought down by an Air Force air-to-air missile. Personnel within both the MOC and NSOC have reported the doomed aircraft was shot down.”
Click to expand...


So based on the above, are you seriously trying to tell us that you never insinuated that United 93 was shot down by a missile? Where in that article does it say that they used guns?
 
[B said:
ULTIMA1[/b]]
When did i say that it was hit by a missile?

Please show me where i stated it was hit by a misisle or admit you are very wrong or very confused.
Click to expand...

Same page:
Ultima1 said:
Its more then a theory when facts and evidence are shown.
Again it does not matter what debris. It matters as proven that their[sic] were different debris fileds.[sic] Which goes along with a shooot[sic] down.

Also as proven thier[sic] are governemnt[sic] reports that state Flight 93 was shot down.
Click to expand...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread379365/pg1#pid4769157

The spelling nightmare alone should tell you who the author of this gem is.
 
Last edited:
Gamolon said:
are you seriously trying to tell us that you never insinuated that United 93 was shot down by a missile? Where in that article does it say that they used guns?
Click to expand...

Perhaps he thinks it was one of these?



8748459aab4cb066d.jpg

​



BV
 
Horatius said:
Of course, Friday this week is Good Friday. Can anyone tell me if US Federal employees have that as a day off? Here in Canada we do (Four day weekend! WooT!)
Click to expand...
DoD employees have to go to work on Friday. I assume the NSA would be the same, but I could be wrong.
 
No Such Agency said:
See you then.
Click to expand...

The only thing left now is figuring out how ULTIMA1 will weasel out of this one. My guess is he'll attempt the "cloaking device:"

NSA: Well surprise surprise, he was a no-show.

ULTIMA1: I was there. Why can't you be mature enough to admit you are afraid of me?

Or a variant. Count on it.
 
Last edited:
AJM8125 said:
The only thing left now is figuring out how ULTIMA1 will weasel out of this one. My guess is he'll attempt the "cloaking device:"

NSA: Well suprise suprise, he was a no-show.

ULTIMA1: I was there. Why can't you be mature enough to admit you are afraid of me?

Or a variant. Count on it.
Click to expand...



That's why I want the Video!
 
Gavron said:
bring a camera (or camera phone).

...oh, and donuts.
Click to expand...

Dude. Why would you say something like that? Brining Donuts along could quite possibly result in severe bodily harm to Ultima and those that would attempt a rescue. Geez, I think Ultima isn't worth the powder but I certainly do not wish pain and suffering upon him.

ETA: Unless of course you meant "doughnuts" and not JoeyDonuts, in which case, well that's just silly of me.
 
Last edited:
Gavron said:
bring a camera (or camera phone).

...oh, and donuts.
Click to expand...

As much as I'd like to be there to give him a much deserved Buzz Aldrin, my ability to get on base at Ft. George G. Meade ended when I left the service.
 
Awww, but that would have been an instant Youtube classic! Especially the part where you send Roger up the flag pole, and you both salute him.

Guess regular doughnuts would have to do then...
 
Gavron said:
Awww, but that would have been an instant Youtube classic! Especially the part where you send Roger up the flag pole, and you both salute him.

Guess regular doughnuts would have to do then...
Click to expand...

No, I don't want to be charged for assaulting a minor.

And the only kind of salute I have for him involves one finger and an upward motion.
 
Gamolon said:
If it's classified information, why are you telling people in a public forum about a classified document you read and what it says?

You don't see a problem with this?
Click to expand...

Because it is not classified information. Let me explain as simple as i can.

1. The flight numbers of the airliners that day are not classified.

2. The types of airliners that day are not classified.

3. The fact of military aircraft launched that day is not classified.

I hope this is simple enougho understand.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Yes, that's exactly my complaint. You did not provide the text of this supposed document. So how can you know what it contains if you haven't seen it?
Click to expand...

gee you complain about me supposidly posted classidied infomration now you complain that i did not post any text. Please make up your mind.

Oh, right. You're trusting 3rd parties who themselves haven't revealed the text of the document. In other words, you're gullible. Thanks for the confirmation.
Click to expand...

But i have read the documnet and the NSA FOIA office verified its existance.

And you can go on showing us FOIA responses, but until the contents of the document are made clear, you're just blowing smoke.
Click to expand...

And you can go on showing how immature you are by not admitting i have proven the document does exist.

Furthermore, as I pointed out before, who cares what the document says? At most, it places another jet in the area. At most.
Click to expand...

At the least it completly contridicts the 9/11 commission report that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom