NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
Well ask your other believer buddies who keep stating they have heard it, are they lying?

Either look it up yourself or admit you do not want to know the turth and are a closed minded immature believer.
Click to expand...

A follow up question: Do you actually enjoy getting your ass handed to you on a daily basis? There is professional help for that sort of thing.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am still waiting for an explanation of how this is a security breach when the information on this critic can be found on the internet.
Click to expand...
If the information on this "critic" is on the internet, why did you need to file a FOIA request? I've only seen reference to what you say is on it. Is there more somewhere? Please post it or give a link.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am still waiting for an explanation of how this is a security breach when the information on this critic can be found on the internet.
Click to expand...

So, the information on the critic is available on the internet? Why then did you need to submit a FOIA request for it? Why not just link the information here?

edit: Deja Vu, DGM :)
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
Well let me know where you work at and we can make up a time and place.
Click to expand...
Ops flag pole, noon tomorrow. Be there or be square.

ULTIMA1 said:
I am still waiting for you to explain how this is a security violation when the information on the critic is on the internet and can be found with minimal research.
Click to expand...
That's like step 1 of your first security briefing. "Just because you see it in open sources doesn't mean its not classified."
 
Gavron said:
So, the information on the critic is available on the internet? Why then did you need to submit a FOIA request for it? Why not just link the information here?

edit: Deja Vu, DGM :)
Click to expand...
This is an easy one. He won't post it because, we would quickly find out he is the primary (and only) source of a document he can't produce. It's "all over the internet" because he put it there (although he doesn't actually have it).
 
Last edited:
jaydeehess said:
Of course although the url indicates that this is the cockpit voice recoder (CVR) it is obvious that it is the air traffic voice tape. Unless there was a wind in the ATC building you'f hear no wind.
Click to expand...

Except for the 2 broadcasts from the cockpit embedded in the recording. I didn't hear any wind there, did you?
 
No Such Agency said:
Ops flag pole, noon tomorrow. Be there or be square.


That's like step 1 of your first security briefing. "Just because you see it in open sources doesn't mean its not classified."
Click to expand...

During the time of the Manhattan Project a sci-fi writer(Harlan Ellison IIRC) submitted a story in which what we now call a 'dirty' nuke was used. He was visited by a couple of FBI agents who asked where he got the idea from. Apparently there were plans to utilize such a thing in the event that an atomic explosion could not be produced.

According to U1's reasoning on this, had an actual Manhattan Project worker read the fictional account it would then be OK to confirm to anyone that this was a bomb type that was being looked at for development. Except of course that doing so in the 1940's would have put you in line for the gallows.
 
Last edited:
ULTIMA1 said:
NO i am debunking people that believe the official story. Since no official reports have been released they have no actual evidence to support the official story as they keep stating.
Click to expand...

Huh?? This is demonstrably untrue. I linked a pair of them myself a couple or three pages back.

On top of that, there's the biggest report out of all of these, one that Ultima himself has referred to:
This is not even an exhaustive list; they're only the ones I can get to quickly online at a moments notice.

Obviously I'm missing something here, but what in God's name did you mean by "no official reports have been released"? You yourself have referred extensively to one of them.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Since no official reports have been released they have no actual evidence to support the official story as they keep stating.
Click to expand...
Since no official reports have been released, you have no actual evidence to support a conspiracy as you keep stating.:rolleyes:
 
Sparky said:
Except for the 2 broadcasts from the cockpit embedded in the recording. I didn't hear any wind there, did you?
Click to expand...

true that, but the fidelity of a radio broadcast of this nature is 300 hz to 3000 hz, maximum thus wind won't sound like wind, it will sound like a rumble. If it were a loud wind you would not make out the voice over the rumble, if it were a light wind you would not hear it , though if there were a big bloody hole in the airframe (BBH) it would be a very loud wind. On the other hand if there were a BBH (or in the case of 200mm cannon fire, a few dozen BBH) in the aircrafme one would also hear the screams of passengers and the hijackers would not likely be telling everyone about a bomb on board given that a fighter was putting holes in the plane already anyway.
Either way this tape does not in the least back up U1's assertion
 
ULTIMA1 said:
2) If Mr. Misner has explained how he came across this "classified document" that contains evidence that a major part of what we've been told about 9/11 is false?

3) If Mr. Misner has explained why he did not seek protection under whistleblower statutes? After all, if true, this evidence and its cover-up is important, the conspirators need to be brought to justice, the pilot and crews involved in this mission need to be un-gagged, and this should be front-page news worldwide.

4) If Mr. Misner has explained why he chose to reveal on the internet what he believes to be the contents of this classified document, without having the document itself? Does he think the conspirators are so dumb that they won't destroy the evidence that he believes exists?

5) Has Mr. Misner indicated that he feels that he is in danger for attempting, however ineffectually, to reveal this cover-up?
Click to expand...
For some reason Mr. Misner unquoted these questions and put his own responses in quotes. So this is how it appears when I reply to his reply.

Right, Ultima1: you refuse to answer simple questions, you cannot understand the basics of intelligence and security matters, and you are a "NSA analyst" who is repeatedly baffled by a button that's used to quote text.

It's obvious to me that you're lying or delusional. Your behavior makes me sad.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Can't you be mature enough to do your own research?

You need me to do everything for you?
Click to expand...

Buddy, that is a laughable statement. Go visit AAL77.COM and you'll see just how laughable that is. The reason I am challenging you is because to my knowledge the CVR has NOT been released yet, so there is no way anyone could listen to it. There is a transcript available, but that is all.

I'm simply calling you out on the false assertions you have been making. So I take it you can't provide a link to back-up your assertion?
 
jaydeehess said:
Either way this tape does not in the least back up U1's assertion
Click to expand...

Thanks. That was the point I was trying to make. I also found it interesting that the other pilots in the area did not report any military aircraft in the area when they had visuals on UA93 and no smoke or smoke trails from the plane while it was airborne.

Do you think U1 is making this stuff up as he goes?
 
Sparky said:
Thanks. That was the point I was trying to make. I also found it interesting that the other pilots in the area did not report any military aircraft in the area when they had visuals on UA93 and no smoke or smoke trails from the plane while it was airborne.

Do you think U1 is making this stuff up as he goes?
Click to expand...

I've already challenged him to listen to the "real time" air traffic transmissions and point me to the reports of this elusive military aircraft. We have the records now. The people reviewing these audios have not reported a single unaccounted for military aircraft in the system. Contrary to what Ultima may want to suggest, ANY aircraft in the sky on 9/11 was under ATC control at some point. Now all he has to do is simply tell us which aircraft it was that fired off the missile that took down UAL93.

Cleveland Audios and Transcripts

See Ultima, I can back up my assertions.
 
Gee, you guys are cruel. Ultima1 posts' appear to be those of a below average 12 year old child. Give 'em a break, will ya?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom