Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember the old Italian proverb....'Slowlee slowlee catcha-da-monkee'. lol....thanks. I love it.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Remember the old Italian proverb....'Slowlee slowlee catcha-da-monkee'. lol....thanks. I love it.
Click to expand...

and there it is, just as I predicted.

You are too predictable bill?

Anyway, it will be fun to watch the truth movement, what little is left, get all super crazy excited over the Jones paper, and then watch them cry and whine when it is proven to be BS.

TAM:)
 
eromitlab said:
Well, good thing the clip you linked to prove that statement actually includes that statement and isn't just ten minutes of Steven Jones babbling on the phone to 9/11 Visibility about his magic supernanothermite "loaded gun" evidence.

Oh wait...
Click to expand...
got my links all mixed up and as a result the whole post lost it's potency. I have slightly rewritten it and gotten the links right now and I hink i is clearer
**********************************************

This is a most revealing combination of statements. It seems plain that the Israelis were already set up and already filming WTC1 some time before the arrival of he first jet to strike the WTC which was the opening shot of all the events of 9/11.


A government source confirms thst they were already filming BEFORE the arrival of the jet and the talk show confirms that hey were there specifically to film the event. This inescapably means that they knew in advance what was going to happen with all the ramifications of that.


In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4874421830690006054&hl=en new movie


And in this clip at the 1:37 mark we have one of the 'dancing Isrealis'' on a talk show in Isreal saying tht they were there to 'document the event'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw talk show


So if you put these two things together you can say that the israelis were here to document the events of 9/11 because they knew the exact time and date of at least the first attack IN ADVANCE.
Anybody got a problem with that ?
 
bill smith said:
In this new 9/11 movie at the 1:20:00 mark the FBI make a statement that the 'dancing Israelis' were already filming WTC1 before the first plane arrived
Click to expand...
Uh, no, the narrator alleges that Robert Baer said that. You trust the film because it's telling you what you want to believe: experience tells me not to trust it at all.
 
MikeW said:
Uh, no, the narrator alleges that Robert Baer said that. You trust the film because it's telling you what you want to believe: experience tells me not to trust it at all.
Click to expand...

f you listen a little longer he says it himself I believe.
 
bill smith said:
f you listen a little longer he says it himself I believe.
Click to expand...
My apologies, so he does.

Well, I'd want to know how that's "confirmed", because statements I've seen say otherwise. The "Maria" who reported them on top of the van said she saw the van park while she was looking at the smoke from the first impact.

Meanwhile their lawyer says this:

"On the day of the disaster, three of the five boys went up on the roof of the building where the company office is located," said Gordon. "I'm not sure if they saw the twin towers collapse, but, in any event, they photographed the ruins right afterwards. One of the neighbors who saw them called the police and claimed they were posing, dancing and laughing, against the background of the burning towers. The five denied dancing. I presume the neighbor was not near them and does not understand Hebrew. Furthermore, the neighbor complained that the cheerful gang on the roof spoke Arabic. As far as I understand it, that neighbor has had previous problems with the company, and she could have been waiting for an opportunity to avenge the owners.

"Anyhow, the three left the roof, took an Urban truck, and drove to a parking lot, located about a five-minute drive from the offices. They parked, stood on the roof of the truck to get a better view of the destroyed towers and took photographs. A woman who was in the building above the lot testified that she saw them smiling and exchanging high-fives. She and another neighbor called the police and reported on Middle-Eastern looking people dancing on the truck. They copied and reported the license plates.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/03/WTC/spies10.html
Click to expand...

Again, they're not up on the truck until after the first attack (though admittedly not from the most objective of sources).
 
MikeW said:
My apologies, so he does.

Well, I'd want to know how that's "confirmed", because statements I've seen say otherwise. The "Maria" who reported them on top of the van said she saw the van park while she was looking at the smoke from the first impact.

Meanwhile their lawyer says this:



Again, they're not up on the truck until after the first attack (though admittedly not from the most objective of sources).
Click to expand...

Even with all you print here the other evidence I have shown you is much stronger. In fact what you print might as well come from the Israelis themselves.

It really makes my blood boil to think of them laughing and high-fiving after filming an attack where 1,500 innocent American workers had just entered the last and most horrible hour of their lives.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Even with all you print here the other evidence I have shown you is much stronger.
Click to expand...
What evidence? The only first-hand evidence I've seen is from Maria, and she says she saw the van park after she began watching the WTC. Baer's comment is interesting, but of little value by comparison until we know where it comes from.
 
MikeW said:
What evidence? The only first-hand evidence I've seen is from Maria, and she says she saw the van park after she began watching the WTC. Baer's comment is interesting, but of little value by comparison until we know where it comes from.
Click to expand...

Well if it doesn't bother you I suppose there's no more to say about it really.
 
bill smith said:
Well if it doesn't bother you I suppose there's no more to say about it really.
Click to expand...
Excellent straw man. So I take it by that dodge you know you can't defend the comment that "the other evidence I have shown you is much stronger", then?
 
MikeW said:
Excellent straw man. So I take it by that dodge you know you can't defend the comment that "the other evidence I have shown you is much stronger", then?
Click to expand...

I can only recommend that others view it and draw their own conclusions. Can't say fairer than that.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure others are already drawing conclusions from your inability to defend your own comments. But hey, that's your call I guess.
 
MikeW said:
I'm sure others are already drawing conclusions from your inability to defend your own comments. But hey, that's your call I guess.
Click to expand...

So be it. I am not really here to persuade. I present the things I know or have observed and if people are persuaded I am content. If not then not.

.
 
Truthers...........

I was arguing with a truther today about controlled demolition how the "bomb" sniffing dogs were removed from the wtc the day before 9/11. I said no such event ever occured in the context you want it to. After weeks of phone threats and heightened security the WTC security level was falling to normal. She claimed that 5 days was plenty of time to rig the world trade center for controlled demolition. I just Roftlol :rolleyes:

I thought i would share today's truther experience with everybody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom