NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
BTW, could you tell me? Really, I've always wanted to know that. What is going on in the world?

All you have to do is not be afraid to do a little research and you can find out whats going on.

I know you can do it.
 
Last edited:
NO, Believers are people that still believe the official story even though they really do not have any actual facts and evidence to support it.

And you have evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job, and you're wasting your time on an internet message board.
 
I am still waiting for you to show where i stated Flight 93 was hit by a missile.

Are you ever going to show it?

You never stated it. Rather, you implied it. October 2, 2008, 5:02pm:
Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.

October 2, 2008, 5:53pm:
Well the document is real and would hold up in court.

It states that Flight 93 was intercepted, follow up reports suggest a fighter came back without a missile. Thats why i asked for follow up reports.

If we've misread these posts, and if your only point was that there was a jet in the area, and that it had no impact on what happened with Flight 93, then our apologies. We misunderstood you. It would've helped if you had not tried the truther tactics of avoiding, distorting, misleading, and obsfucating, but if you're willing to admit that FL93 was indeed hijacked and flown into the ground by terrorists, then you and we actually do agree on something.
 
Last edited:
And you have evidence that proves 9/11 was an inside job, and you're wasting your time on an internet message board.

NO i am trying to find out what actually happened that day by doing research and filing FOIA request and then passing it on.
 
I did not lie about being a analyst.

If you would have read and followed along any of the post i have made concerning my employment you would know that i was a federal police officer first and then an analyst.

Just proves my point that believers do not know whats going on.

Your transcript does not support any of this or your fire safety officer claim.

Please post the parts that do. You were a security guard/officer and nothing on yoru transcript show you are an analyst. In fact you have withdrawn or no entered a lot of the stuff on that transcript you gave me. You AF one is dodgy as well as far as dates go.
 
If we've misread these posts, and if your only point was that there was a jet in the area, and that it had no impact on what happened with Flight 93, then our apologies. We misunderstood you. .

How hard is it to misread about a document that states that at least 1 plane was intercepted on 9/11?

This disagrees with the 9/11 commission report that states that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11.
 
How hard is it to misread about a document that states that at least 1 plane was intercepted on 9/11?

This disagrees with the 9/11 commission report that states that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11.

Is this next claims yours?


ultima1 said:
Well the official story states that no planes (intercepters) were near flight 93.

This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.
 
I know, START WITH THE DOCUMENT YOU KEEP RAMBLING ABOUT. POST A VERIFIED COPY OF THAT!!!

TAM:)
 
Oh, so you don't know what's "really going on in this world"?

I know a lot more then you and most others on here it seems.

How much research have you done and how many FOIA request have you sent to find out what happened that day?
 
How hard is it to misread about a document that states that at least 1 plane was intercepted on 9/11?

This disagrees with the 9/11 commission report that states that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11.

... and then what? Did that jet watch the hijackers fly it into the ground? Do you agree with the fact that hijackers took control of Flight 93 and flew it into the ground after the passengers revolted?

Again, if your only beef is that radar coverage missed a jet, and that the 9/11 Commision was mistaken about this point, then you actually do have a legitimate point. But, the next question is, so what? If there was a jet in the area and if it failed to shoot down Flight 93, then what is the true magnitude of error in the 9/11 Commision Report? Is a single mistake, commited from an error about radar data truly that significant?

Anyway, I'm happy to see that you're not claiming anything suspicious about Flight 93's crash. This is good, this is really good.
 
NO, Believers are people that still believe the official story even though they really do not have any actual facts and evidence to support it.

You know attacking people is a true sign that you cannot have an adult discussion and do not have any evidence.
 
I want to see an unedited image of the document you keep going on about, along with documentation that verifies it as legitimate. I don't care about the legitimacy of your request. I want to see the actual document, along with verification of IT, so that I may read it for myself.

TAM:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom