NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sabrina said:
He basically dodges the question every time we ask and refuses to understand that his actions have violated operational security and would, in many circumstances, be enough to completely revoke his security clearance, if he even has one, not to mention send him to jail for violating his nondisclosure agreement. .
Click to expand...

Please explain to me how i have violated operational security when the infomration i have provided can be found on the open internet?
 
No Such Agency said:
Doing so would be incredibly unwise, you should (but obviously do not) know that. Also, this is where I point out I never claimed to have first hand knowledge of any of the stuff we're talking about.
Click to expand...


So why can't you be mature enough to meet me face to face?

Are you afraid you wouuld have to admit i am who i say i am?
 
AJM8125 said:
Keep editing G-man, sooner or later you'll write the truth.
Click to expand...

What is so sad is that believers keep stating they have evidence but the fact remains that most of the evidence has not been released. Some of the evidence that has been released questions the official story.

Why do beleivers have to be so dishonest?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
What is so sad is that believers keep stating they have evidence but the fact remains that most of the evidence has not been released. Some of the evidence that has been released questions the official story.

Why do beleivers have to be so dishonest?
Click to expand...


Hey! Speaking of facts and evidence, are you ever going to present some?
 
An Office of Weapons and Space analyst, a retired NIST analyst, the clone of Galileo, what the hell are these guys doing on an internet message board?
 
AJM8125 said:
Hey! Speaking of facts and evidence, are you ever going to present some?
Click to expand...

I have been, its not my fault if you do not want to accept it.

When are believers ever going to post any real facts or evidence? OOPS sorry forgot they do not have any, only what they believe in thier little fantasy world.
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
An Office of Weapons and Space analyst, a retired NIST analyst, the clone of Galileo, what the hell are these guys doing on an internet message board?
Click to expand...


Where did NIST come from? You guys just keep proving how little pay attention and know.

When are you ever going to try to find out whats really going on in the world?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
What is so sad is that believers keep stating they have evidence but the fact remains that most of the evidence has not been released. Some of the evidence that has been released questions the official story.
Click to expand...

Regardless of what remains to be released, the evidence that has been made available already clearly establishes that FL93 wasn't hit by a missile, had the hijackers at the controls, and crashed in Shanksville. Unless you have documentation that falsifies:
  1. The FDR
  2. The CVR
  3. The cell and airphone testimony
  4. The wreckage recovery information, and all other forensic data that derived from it
... then you nothing that can do anything other than fill gaps in the story. You certainly have not proved a shootdown, nor can you, unless you have something demonstrating that the above, very abbreviated and summarized list was fabricated.

If your document does indeed establish there was a jet in the area, and if it establishes that it truly did fire a missile, then it missed. If it didn't, at minimum the FDR, CVR, and wreckage distribution would be different. As I said before, you cannot establish that the dominant narrative is wrong; the most you could prove even if you're somehow correct about everything is that there was another jet in the area that avoided radar coverage. None of that changes a thing about how FL93 crashed.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
Where did NIST come from? You guys just keep proving how little you know.

When are you ever going to try to find out whats really going on in the world?
Click to expand...

Maybe you should contact the poster named "Bob the analyst" (formally known as "Professor Smartpants"), maybe you guys should get together and help start that new investigation.

Just sayin'.
 
T.A.M. said:
Put up or shut up Ultima. We have heard your claims, so unless you have something new to add, why don't you get busy getting your presentation of said document (with appropriate verification) ready.

Is there a reason why you continue to warn us of the impending documents, rather then just providing them?

And while you are at it, Mr. NSA Analyst, please obtain a dictionary, spell checker, and learn how to use the quote function properly.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
I agree, Obviously he read and misinterpreted something. So far nothing he has posted has come close to supporting his claims. This looks to me like someone wanting to believe something so badly that he only sees what he wants to see. Kind of sad actually.
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Regardless of what remains to be released, the evidence that has been made available already clearly establishes that FL93 wasn't hit by a missile,
Click to expand...


When did i say that it was hit by a missile?

Please show me where i stated it was hit by a misisle or admit you are very wrong or very confused.
 
DGM said:
So far nothing he has posted has come close to supporting his claims.
Click to expand...


Lets just look at some simple facts.

Fact 1. The 9/11 commission report states that no fighters were near any of the planes on 9/11.

Fact 2. The NSA document which has been verified to exist from many sources states that at least 1 plane was intercepted.

The only thing that is really sad is that beleivers just do not want to accept facts and evidence that does not agree with thier safe little fantasy world.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
When did i say that it was hit by a missile?

Please show me where i stated it was hit by a misisle or admit you are very wrong and very confused.
Click to expand...

Actually, this is wonderful. You're coming around. You're now opening the door to admitting that the jet wasn't hit by a missile. In spite of your posts from last year:

ULTIMA1 said:
This document will show that Flight 93 was intercepted by fighters and possibly shot down.
Click to expand...

ULTIMA1 said:
Well the document is real and would hold up in court.

It states that Flight 93 was intercepted, follow up reports suggest a fighter came back without a missile. Thats why i asked for follow up reports.
Click to expand...

Wonderful! This is actually progress. So you do agree that, even if your document is correct that it doesn't change how Flight 93 crashed, it at best only challenges a minute point about what jets were in the area. Right?
 
ULTIMA1 said:
The only thing that is really sad is that beleivers just do not want to accept facts and evidence that does not agree with thier safe little fantasy world.
Click to expand...

By "believers", do you mean the few people here on this board? Why are you so worried what we here think, don't you have bigger fish to fry?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom