Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
bill smith said:
It looks like a fake to me too...but it gives the idea for sure. That's why I posted it.
Click to expand...

idea?

I am confused, were you trying to make a point that I missed, that this photo supports?

Or did you post it merely to illustrate what it would look like if in fact AA Flight77 did "flyover" instead of crash into the Pentagon.

What the photo has illustrated, very nicely, is just HOW OBVIOUS to all of the witnesses, such a flyover would be.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
idea?

I am confused, were you trying to make a point that I missed, that this photo supports?

Or did you post it merely to illustrate what it would look like if in fact AA Flight77 did "flyover" instead of crash into the Pentagon.

What the photo has illustrated, very nicely, is just HOW OBVIOUS to all of the witnesses, such a flyover would be.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Does it's flight path put it over the navy annex at any point ? It's nose-up so it dosn't look like it plans to land at Reagan though there is no certainty that it WOULD have landed here f there had been an overflight. Would the Citgo tape have caught it where it is in the picture ? Do the trees look right for the time of year ? I like photoanalysis.lol
 
Last edited:
Now that you mention what should have been caught on tape, don't you think the doubletree video should have shown a flyover as well?

Funny how none of the videos, and none of the witnesses have ever indicated a flyover...

The only suggestion of a flyover has come from the morons at PFT and CIT...fringe of fringe, to say the least.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Now that you mention what should have been caught on tape, don't you think the doubletree video should have shown a flyover as well?

Funny how none of the videos, and none of the witnesses have ever indicated a flyover...

The only suggestion of a flyover has come from the morons at PFT and CIT...fringe of fringe, to say the least.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

\From my point of view it is evident that no 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Given that so many witnesses report a large plane I have to assume one overflew the building. The hundred+ witnesses who witnessed he impact ? The jury is still out on that .
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
\From my point of view it is evident that no 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Given that so many witnesses report a large plane I have to assume one overflew the building. The hundred+ witnesses who witnessed he impact ? The jury is still out on that .
Click to expand...

"from your point of view" is the rub of all of this.

It is like trying to argue with someone who believes in leprachauns, that there is no "pot of gold".

The overwhelming evidence including DNA, plane parts, witness testimony, photographic evidence, all indicate, without a doubt, that flight 77, a 757, hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

Now if you, as do most truthers, decide to call all of this evidence faked and/or fabricated, then there is no sense in even discussing this with you.

Good night

TAM:)
 
A W Smith said:
Thats a screen grab from one of CITs original "pentacon" you boob animations. Its in one of the introductions if i recall. You must be very new at this. Are you even old enough to buy liquor yet?
no of course not. its seven pm and his mommy has already tucked him into bed
Click to expand...

Given the attitude he displays on other websites as shown to us by another forum member who is familiar with him, he likely has ulterior motives for arguing this way. He argues as if he's a no-planer for the WTC, and the Pentagon, and on top of that he thinks CD. If he were serious about convincing anyone of his beliefs he would be randomly flinging this material around.
 
bill smith said:
\From my point of view it is evident that no 757 crashed into the Pentagon. Given that so many witnesses report a large plane I have to assume one overflew the building. The hundred+ witnesses who witnessed he impact ? The jury is still out on that .
Click to expand...

Your point of view means nothing, is patently ridiculous, and is based on nothing but your profound ignorance and/or mental illness. Congratulations, you are one of the very few people in the world to be fooled by the stupidest group of twoofers there is. I can barely even believe that people buy that flyover nonsense. It is supported by nothing at all, contradicted by everything (including CITs own witnesses), and is overall one of the stupidest things that I have ever heard. You just believe any old thing that you read on twoofer websites, don't you no planer bill?

The jury is not still out. Eyewitnesses say that a plane flew into the building because the damn plane flew into the building. And all other evidence perfectly matches it. The end.
 
bill smith said:
I think i may have assumed that at least some of them were Pentagon surveillnce tapes. I felt sure that the hilipad would have been under camera view. But you live and you learn.
Click to expand...


I gave you the link to 911Myths that gave further information on each video. You even claimed to have seen it before, but you obviously didn't review the information on the page. Why do you insist on wasting your time like this?
 
dtugg said:
......The jury is not still out. Eyewitnesses say that a plane flew into the building because the damn plane flew into the building. And all other evidence perfectly matches it. The end.
Click to expand...
...and there were bits of aeroplane following the crash. And bits of people...and....

So even if there were no witnesses to the plane hitting the building it still did ANDS lots of evidence - even the bloody big hole in the building.....
 
Thermite and nano materials at WTC formally confirmed

Dr.Steven Jones recently said:-
''My colleagues and I have a new mainstream peer-reviewed paper published today, entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust From the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe". Basically it shows that high tech explosive/pyrotechnic materials are scattered throughout the WTC dust. How can this be?''


''In short, the paper explodes the official story that “no evidence'' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings." The red/gray chips are the "loaded gun'' of 9-11

http://visibility911.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/thermite-fingerprint-300x190.jpg
.
http://cdn2.libsyn.com/visibility91...29&nva=20090407055629&t=015c933a3fd496cd08dd6 audio

http://cdn2.libsyn.com/visibility91...15&nva=20090407055315&t=0864bd94db70c668c1857 audio
 
Last edited:
How close is 9/11 to full exposure right now ? Think about it. There is absolutely no way to explain high-tech nanomaterials and unreacted thermite at the WTC. You might say of the thermite that perhaps it was from an erlier use of thermite for some unknwn reason in the Towers- but not in combination with nanotechnology and not bonded to the grey materiel which may also be a nano compound.

This new paper is already peer reviewed in a mainstream scientific journal,It looks ike the fat lady has started singing at long last. Crawford Texas next stop.
 
kevin Ryan talked in one of these interviews about going after the perps and interestingly, to investigate debunkers to find out why they are so motivated to assist in the coverup.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
kevin Ryan talked in one of these interviews about going after the perps and interestingly, to investigate debunkers to find out why they are so motivated to assist in the coverup.
Click to expand...

I get paid very well by the NWO.

And you don't know if I am serious or not because I could be double or triple or quadruple bluffing.
 
bill smith said:
How close is 9/11 to full exposure right now ? Think about it. There is absolutely no way to explain high-tech nanomaterials and unreacted thermite at the WTC. You might say of the thermite that perhaps it was from an erlier use of thermite for some unknwn reason in the Towers- but not in combination with nanotechnology and not bonded to the grey materiel which may also be a nano compound.

This new paper is already peer reviewed in a mainstream scientific journal,It looks ike the fat lady has started singing at long last. Crawford Texas next stop.
Click to expand...

Sure there is. It wasn't actually thermite and your heroes are incompetent frauds.

But I am really an NWO agent so don't listen to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom