Thank you for finally admitting you did not give an explanation for the molten steel.
That's because there was no liquid steel.
Here is short video showing how little damage ONE THOUSAND POUNDS OF THERMITE does to a SUV, maybe 3,000 pounds of steel.
In your mind, scale this up to the video we have of 10s of tons of liquid metal flowing from one floor of one WTC tower.
Notice that there are no pools of liquid steel and that people can approach the wreck within minutes of the end of the burn.
Notice how relatively little slag there is.
Notice that Thermite doesn't work horizontally. It runs away because when it's burning, it is effectively a liquid.
Notice that the much of the thermite not in actual contact with steel is wasted. There is a limit to how much thermite that can be applied to a beam that will actually heat the beam. Once thermite as turned to slag, it is hot but not hot enough to melt steel.
Notice how large and bulky a half ton of thermite is.
How many tons of thermite would be required and where would it be put?
That floor was occupied by Fuji Bank and it's not like the floors were empty and waiting for the truck to deliver the thermite. The floors were full of UPS equipment and the equipment powered by the UPS. There was no
room for the quantity of thermite required.
A bank and its computer system are covered by several independent layers of security. No one person can turn it off or ignore an alarm.
All of your empty assertions of themite and molten steel amount to nothing and the only information you have to support it amounts to sloppy use of the English language and unquestioned rumor and metaphor and hyperbole.
There was lots of sloppy English, metaphor and hyperbole and simile in use on and after 9/11, frequently by people that should know better. And lots of rumors, too.
The only thing that counts is physical evidence. there is no physical evidence for previously liquid steel at WTC.
