• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought he said there was no sign that a plane had crashed near the Pentagon, in response to a question from the studio as to whether the plane had hit the ground before hitting the building. In other words, the plane didn't crash near the Pentagon, it crashed into the Pentagon.

Or is that too simple and obvious, and was there some clever way that he could give a more convincing fake story by contradicting himself? Maybe it was a clever double-bluff, to make it look like he was actually slightly confused by being at the centre of the action, and give the appearance of responding to events rather than reading from a script. Or maybe a triple bluff, to fool truthers into concocting stupid no-plane theories that nobody with half a functioning brain cell could take seriously for a microsecond. I guess we'll never know for sure.

One thing's for certain. There can't be a simple and obvious explanation. Those are never right, are they?

Dave

But you DO agree the video sequence has been reversed ? If you don't we can do a full analysis of the evidence for reversal. Further- it has been PROFESSIONALLY worked over. This is not the work of an amateur.

I contend that it is plain what he meant....just as it is plain what Silverstein meant when he said 'pull it'. Of course it is possible for people to doggedly stick to the line of him and McIntyre meaning something else altogether. No problem....It is not provable anyway but if we ever get a chance to present it to the Nation we will see what people will mostly opt for. We know what we hear generally.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjlBpChvzD8 Back Asswards
 
Last edited:
But you DO agree the video sequence has been reversed ?

A Typical Conversation with bill smith.

bill smith: Here's a piece of evidence that proves there was a conspiracy.

Sane Person: Here's a perfectly rational explanation that has nothing to do with a conspiracy.

bs: But you DO agree it proves a conspiracy?

SP: :confused::boggled::covereyes

Dave
 
But you DO agree the video sequence has been reversed ? If you don't we can do a full analysis of the evidence for reversal. Further- it has been PROFESSIONALLY worked over. This is not the work of an amateur.

I didn't bother watching the video mostly because I don't care what some youtube video says. But assuming that it was messed with, who says it was done "PROFESSIONALLY"? Any jackass with a computer can edit video and steal professional software from the internet to do it.

I contend that it is plain what he meant....just as it is plain what Silverstein meant when he said 'pull it'. Of course it is possible for people to doggedly stick to the line of him and McIntyre meaning something else. No problem....It is not provable but if we ever get a hance to present it to the Nation we will see what people will mostly opt for. We know what we hear generally.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjlBpChvzD8 Back Asswards

Here is a news flash for you: Reality doesn't conform to your opinions. Especially as you have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that you have very serious issues with reality (or are just a troll).
 
Last edited:
A Typical Conversation with bill smith.

bill smith: Here's a piece of evidence that proves there was a conspiracy.

Sane Person: Here's a perfectly rational explanation that has nothing to do with a conspiracy.

bs: But you DO agree it proves a conspiracy?

SP: :confused::boggled::covereyes

Dave

Very convincing Dave....you too Dtugg.
 
Very convincing Dave....you too Dtugg.

Oh, I have no illusions that I would talk you out of your stupid fantasies. Some people are beyond hope. Besides, it is funnier for me if you keep on believing ridiculous crap.
 
Last edited:
Very convincing Dave....you too Dtugg.
Bill, as you probably know, although I rarely visit the CT forums, it didn't take me very long to get an idea that you may well have an overwhelming desire to share and promote what most sane people regard as a self-delusional worldview
 
Bill, as you probably know, although I rarely visit the CT forums, it didn't take me very long to get an idea that you may well have an overwhelming desire to share and promote what most sane people regard as a self-delusional worldview

I call it as I see it. I wish I saw 9/11 another way. Believe me when I say I don't want to be doing this but I am driven to by my sense of absolute outrage. Outrage is something that America no longer knows. It seems you will accept anything the government does without putting up a real fight. You know it- I know it. This is not what the Founding Fathers fought for.
 
Last edited:
I call it as I see it. I wish I saw 9/11 another way. Believe me when I say I don't want to be doing this but I am driven to by my sense of absolute outrage.
If you really want an accurate view of reality, pause a while... suspend your (confirmation reinforcing) outrage and start from scratch... apply Occam's Razor to each and every known (i.e. not rumoured) event

You have nothing to lose, right?
 
If you really want an accurate view of reality, pause a while... suspend your (confirmation reinforcing) outrage and start from scratch... apply Occam's Razor to each and every known (i.e. not rumoured) event

You have nothing to lose, right?

Occam's razor only applies when there is a doubt. there IS no doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
 
Last edited:
Occam's razor only applies hen there is a doubt. there IS no doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.
I'm afraid such statements are the hallmark of those unwilling and/or incapable of thinking

Good luck with that

Please, do resist any urge to operate heavy machinery
 
I call it as I see it. I wish I saw 9/11 another way. Believe me when I say I don't want to be doing this but I am driven to by my sense of absolute outrage. Outrage is something that America no longer knows. It seems you will accept anything the government does without putting up a real fight. You know it- I know it. This is not what the Founding Fathers fought for.

Hey bill, since you are feeling so outraged, what are you doing besides crying on the Internet? For example, KSM the alleged mastermind of the attacks is in US custody in Gitmo, and will be on trial for his life soon. Are you doing anything to exonerate him? Like sending your "evidence" to his ACLU provided civilian lawyers? Come on bill smith. You could be a hero! (LOL!) Prove to the world that 9/11 was an inside job and free an innocent man. What are you waiting for? Are you a morally bankrupt coward like every other twoofer in the world?
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid such statements are the hallmark of those unwilling and/or incapable of thinking

Good luck with that

Please, do resist any urge to operate heavy machinery

Yes...tinfoil hats and all that good stuff.
 
Hey bill, since you are feeling so outraged, what are you doing besides crying on the Internet? For example, KSM the alleged mastermind of the attacks is in US custody in Gitmo, and will be on trial for his life soon. Are you doing anything to exonerate him? Like sending your "evidence" to his ACLU provided civilian lawyers? Come on bill smith. You could be a hero! (LOL!) Prove to the world that 9/11 was an inside job and free an innocent man. What are you waiting for? Are you a morally bankrupt coward like every other twoofer in the world?

I can only do what I can do but always remember the old Indian proverb dTugg.....slowleee slowlee catchee monkee.
 
Last edited:
I can only do what I can do but always remember the old Indian proverb dTugg.....slowleee slowlee catchee monkee.

What you can do is contact his lawyers and send them your "evidence"? Are you going to do this or not?
 
That's not my area of interest.

OK. So you are morally bankrupt in addition to delusional. You have total proof that 9/11 was an inside job yet you are holding on to it rather than sharing it with someone that might use it to exonerate his client (who is being tried be the real perps), because it isn't your "area of interest." Thanks for us know this about you, bill.
 
OK. So you are morally bankrupt in addition to delusional. You have total proof that 9/11 was an inside job yet you are holding on to it rather than sharing it with someone that might use it to exonerate his client (who is being tried be the real perps), because it isn't your "area of interest." Thanks for us know this about you, bill.

That's the political end of things. I deal in the nuts and bolts so to speak.
 
That's the political end of things. I deal in the nuts and bolts so to speak.

If you hold evidence that can exonerate an innocent man of the crime of the century and you sit on in, you are morally bankrupt piece of scum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom