NSA Document Flight 93 intercepted coming soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
ULTIMA1 said:
WRONG.

According to the 9/11 official story no fighters made it near any of the 9/11 planes.

I suggest you read the 9/11 commission report.
Click to expand...

Listen Mr. I don't have a clue...you said it talked about a plane intercept, NOT one of the specific hijacked aircraft. I have read the 911 Commission Report many times and unlike you, reviewed ALL of the available radar data, ATC communications and other documents. You might want to try that before claiming something you CANNOT document. I've posted all kinds of primary evidence that PROVES you wrong. If you want more, I got plenty to keep your little brain overloaded for the next year. Delta 1989 is just ONE case of an intercept. There was concern that since it was on the same route as AA11 and UAL93 that it may have been hijacked. There were also communication issues that led controllers to suspect it even more.

So quit making claims you cannot back up.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
His dodge of being immature and not admiting the answers given are correct is also noted.

More prove of the immaturity of the people that believe the official story.
Click to expand...

I'm not talking about him, I'm talking about you. He isn't logged on otherwise you can discuss your issues about him with him.
 
AJM8125 said:
I'm not talking about him, I'm talking about you. He isn't logged on otherwise you can discuss your issues about him with him.
Click to expand...

Well if you are going to call me out you need to call him out also or it shows how biast you are.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
His dodge of being immature and not admiting the answers given are correct is also noted.

More proof of the immaturity of the people that believe the official story.
Click to expand...
Why were you in jail for 3 months?

Your lack of evidence to refute the official story is due to what?

When will you have the promised doc?
 
beachnut said:
Your lack of evidence to refute the official story is due to what?
Click to expand...

If we went to cout right now and you were asked to show evidence to support the official story you would have none.

I on the other hand have plenty of evidence to show reasonable doubt in the official story.

Sorry you lose.
 
AJM8125 said:
Um, no. I can call you on your BS as it stands on its own lack of merit. WTF is a "biast", by the way?
Click to expand...

What i have answered is not BS. If he was mature he would not be afraid to admit what i have posted is in fact correct.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
I am not making claims that i cannot back up.

I can show the answer from NSA on the FOIA request for the document about the intercept.
Click to expand...

Here is your letter.

You asked for two things:

1) "a declassified copy of the CRITIC messages..."
2) "...any follow-up reports from September 11, 2001 of the interception of Flight 93"

They responded:

"The material responsive to your request is not voluminous or complex..."

This would lead any moron to understand that they are sending you a copy of the CRITIC messages and that the second part of your request is virtually non-existent (can you imagine the paperwork if a fighter shot down a civilian plane).

Bottom line, you don't have a clue what they are sending you and to present it as evidence before it is even sent is sheer stupidity. I recommend a class in reading comprehension.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
If we went to cout right now and you were asked to show evidence to support the official story you would have none.

I on the other hand have plenty of evidence to show reasonable doubt in the official story.

Sorry you lose.
Click to expand...
LOL – now I can laugh while rebuilding the computers and cutting the grass, splitting wood, doing the dishes, washing the clothes, and making dinner on the sunny day in NorCal watching the trees bloom and see spring emerge. When will your paper come?

Bottom line!!! there were intercepts on 911; so? I can name few with the google 911Truth only source of info tool.

19 terrorists did 911 and you can't refute it; I can prove it; it is common knowledge you can't offer one piece of evidence to refute this save denial of evidence already in the public domain as you wait for a message about an intercept on flight 93 that never happened. And you have no clue about explanations already presented.

You have failed to post anything that looks like evidence.

You have presented zero evidence; your post is a lie.

I am not trying to win, your posts are self-critiquing, and I won on the first post you made. You will not post evidence; you have zero evidence.

You could list your evidence, but you can’t. Why?

What do you do at NSA?
 
911files said:
Scary question ain't it? If this guy is representative of the caliber of people employed at the NSA....we are in BIG trouble.
Click to expand...

You think what you've seen thus far is bad? See my signature. Yes he really said that. The only thing that ULTIMA1 has convinced me of is that he is a liar and does not work for the NSA.
 
911files said:
Scary question ain't it? If this guy is representative of the caliber of people employed at the NSA....we are in BIG trouble.
Click to expand...
True

The letter from the NSA looks like a brush off and offers some clues to the fact there may not be a message at all (“your request is not voluminous or complex”, i.e., there is no intercept of the real flight 93!)

Ultima1 should have included any messages about intercepting planes confused to be flight 93. He may have had a response by now.

So if there is no message or paperwork on the intercept of Flight 93, is there a need for the NSA to reply further?

“not voluminous or complex” is a smart-alecky way to say there ain’t none.
 
Last edited:
dtugg said:
You think what you've seen thus far is bad? See my signature. Yes he really said that. The only thing that ULTIMA1 has convinced me of is that he is a liar and does not work for the NSA.
Click to expand...

Of course not. If he worked for the NSA and knew the document existed, he would have located it while at work, taken a pic with his cell phone camera and sold it to the media for an unGodly sum of money. I mean, this would be the most earth-shattering news story of our time and we all need a break from the constant "sky is falling" news coverage of the past few months.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
What i have answered is not BS. If he was mature he would not be afraid to admit what i have posted is in fact correct.
Click to expand...

Yes. speacilly when the you and the outher beleivers attack and insult poeple for no reason then they disagree with you.
 
I kept meaning to update everyone on my follow up FOIA asking for what ever Ultima receives.

It remains in limbo, the NSA had referred the response to other Departments (that they refused to name) because they had an "interest" in the documents responsive to the FOIA's.

Does that mean that whatever documents they have show an inside jobby job? Of course not. But they do have at least one piece of paper and less than 100 pages responsive to the FOIA's.

Easy queue my ass.
 
ULTIMA1 said:
If we went to cout right now and you were asked to show evidence to support the official story you would have none.

I on the other hand have plenty of evidence to show reasonable doubt in the official story.

Sorry you lose.
Click to expand...

If the case is to examine whether or not flight 93 was shot down versus flown into the ground the gov't has the FDR tapes, the radar tapes and the statements of personell involved in tracking the aircraft.

You have a letter that suggests that there is a docuement pertaining to the question you asked. Your docuement does not state what you claim it does, that the plane was in fact intercepted, let alone state thet that plane was shot down.

Your case gets thrown out of court.
 
How about it?

Ultima1 said:
OK here it is again for the 100th time.

1981-1985 US Air Force, Crew Chief.

1986-1998 DoD, Police officer.

1998-pres. DoD, Analyst, also Fire/Safety officer for my organization.
Click to expand...


OK, you said you were federal police officer but your NSA transcript shows you have been working for them since you left the AF. Were you military police?

Your transcript says nothing about your fire training either. Your transcript does not say what you say it does.
 
funk de fino said:
Your transcript says nothing about your fire training either. Your transcript does not say what you say it does.
Click to expand...
funk, I think I already took him to task on the fire/safety training many months ago.

If I recall correctly, he was appointed a (what we call in the AF) a "Unit Safety Representative". He likely got some minimal training on doing monthly fire/safety inspections, and it probably wouldn't be reflected in his training records.

Ultima, if I'm wrong, I'm open to correction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom